without waiting to consult him, instantly 
obtained an injunction from the Court of Chancery to stop the sale. 
What he himself felt, on receiving intelligence of the injury done him 
by one from whom his kindness deserved a very different return, will 
be best conveyed in his own words. The following is an extract of a 
letter to a friend, which he dictated on this subject from a sick-bed. 
BATH, 15th Feb., 1797. 
"My Dear Laurence,-- 
"On the appearance of the advertisement, all newspapers and all letters 
have been kept back from me till this time. Mrs. Burke opened yours, 
and finding that all the measures in the power of Dr. King, yourself, 
and Mr. Woodford, had been taken to suppress the publication, she 
ventured to deliver me the letters to-day, which were read to me in my 
bed, about two o'clock. 
"This affair does vex me; but I am not in a state of health at present to 
be deeply vexed at anything. Whenever this matter comes into 
discussion, I authorize you to contradict the infamous reports which (I 
am informed) have been given out, that this paper had been circulated 
through the ministry, and was intended gradually to slide into the press. 
To the best of my recollection I never had a clean copy of it but one, 
which is now in my possession; I never communicated that, but to the 
Duke of Portland, from whom I had it back again. But the Duke will set 
this matter to rights, if in reality there were two copies, and he has one. 
I never showed it, as they know, to any one of the ministry. If the Duke 
has really a copy, I believe his and mine are the only ones that exist, 
except what was taken by fraud from loose and incorrect papers by 
S----, to whom I gave the letter to copy. As soon as I began to suspect 
him capable of any such scandalous breach of trust, you know with 
what anxiety I got the loose papers out of his hands, not having reason 
to think that he kept any other. Neither do I believe in fact (unless he 
meditated this villany long ago) that he did or does now possess any 
clean copy. I never communicated that paper to any one out of the very
small circle of those private friends from whom I concealed nothing. 
"But I beg you and my friends to be cautious how you let it be 
understood that I disclaim anything but the mere act and intention of 
publication. I do not retract any one of the sentiments contained in that 
memorial, which was and is my justification, addressed to the friends 
for whose use alone I intended it. Had I designed it for the public, I 
should have been more exact and full. It was written in a tone of 
indignation, in consequence of the resolutions of the Whig Club, which 
were directly pointed against myself and others, and occasioned our 
secession from that club; which is the last act of my life that I shall 
under any circumstances repent. Many temperaments and explanations 
there would have been, if I had ever had a notion that it should meet the 
public eye." 
In the mean time a large impression, amounting, it is believed, to three 
thousand copies, had been dispersed over the country. To recall these 
was impossible; to have expected that any acknowledged production of 
Mr. Burke, full of matter likely to interest the future historian, could 
remain forever in obscurity, would have been folly; and to have passed 
it over in silent neglect, on the one hand, or, on the other, to have then 
made any considerable changes in it, might have seemed an 
abandonment of the principles which it contained. The author, therefore, 
discovering, that, with the exception of the introductory letter, he had 
not in fact kept any clean copy, as he had supposed, corrected one of 
the pamphlets with his own hand. From this, which was found 
preserved with his other papers, his friends afterwards thought it their 
duty to give an authentic edition. 
The "Thoughts and Details on Scarcity" were originally presented in 
the form of a memorial to Mr. Pitt. The author proposed afterwards to 
recast the same matter in a new shape. He even advertised the intended 
work under the title of "Letters on Rural Economics, addressed to Mr. 
Arthur Young"; but he seems to have finished only two or three 
detached fragments of the first letter. These being too imperfect to be 
printed alone, his friends inserted them in the memorial, where they 
seemed best to cohere. The memorial had been fairly copied, but did 
not appear to have been examined or corrected, as some trifling errors 
of the transcriber were    
    
		
	
	
	Continue reading on your phone by scaning this QR Code
 
	 	
	
	
	    Tip: The current page has been bookmarked automatically. If you wish to continue reading later, just open the 
Dertz Homepage, and click on the 'continue reading' link at the bottom of the page.
	    
	    
