to the magistrates and learn of them." 
'The imperial decision was -- "Approved."' 
The destruction of the scholars is related more briefly. In the year after 
the burning of the Books, the resentment of the emperor was excited by 
the remarks and the flight of two scholars who had been favourites with 
him, and he determined to institute a strict inquiry about all of their 
class in Hsien-yang, to find out whether they had been making ominous 
speeches about him, and disturbing the minds of the people. The 
investigation was committed to the Censors [1], and it being discovered 
that upwards of 460 scholars had violated the prohibitions, they were 
all buried alive in pits [2], for a warning to the empire, while 
degradation and banishment were employed more strictly than before 
against all who fell under suspicion. The emperor's eldest son, Fu-su, 
remonstrated with him, saying that such measures against those who 
repeated the words of Confucius and sought to imitate him, would 
alienate all the people from their infant dynasty, but his interference 
offended him father so much that he was sent off from court, to be with 
the general who was superintending the building of the great wall. 
8. No attempts have been made by Chinese critics and historians to 
discredit the record of these events, though some have questioned the
extent of the injury inflicted by them on the monuments of their ancient 
literature [3]. It is important to observe that the edict against the Books 
did not extend to the Yi-ching, which was 
1 御岿‚‰æ¡ˆå•諸生, 諸生傳相告引. 
2 自除犯ç¦è€…, 四百å…-餘人, 皆阬之咸陽. The 
meaning of this passage as a whole is sufficiently plain, but I am unable 
to make out the force of the phrase 自 除. 
3 See the remarks of Chamg Chia-tsi (夾際é„-æ°), of the Sung 
dynasty, on the subject, in the æ–‡ç»é€šè€ƒ, Bk. clxxiv. p. 5. 
exempted as being a work on divination, nor did it extend to the other 
classics which were in charge of the Board of Great Scholars. There 
ought to have been no difficulty in finding copies when the Han 
dynasty superseded that of the Ch'in, and probably there would have 
been none but for the sack of the capital in B.C. 206 by Hsiang Yu, the 
formidable opponent of the founder of the House of Han. Then, we are 
told, the fires blazed for three months among the palaces and public 
buildings, and must have proved as destructive to the copies of the 
Great Scholars as the edict of the tyrant had been to the copies among 
the people. 
It is to be noted also that the life of Shih Hwang Ti lasted only three 
years after the promulgation of his edict. He died in B.C. 210, and the 
reign of his second son who succeeded him lasted only other three 
years. A brief period of disorder and struggling for the supreme 
authority between different chiefs ensured; but the reign of the founder 
of the Han dynasty dates from B.C. 202. Thus, eleven years were all 
which intervened between the order for the burning of the Books and 
rise of that family, which signaled itself by the care which it bestowed 
for their recovery; and from the edict of the tyrant of Ch'in against 
private individuals having copies in their keeping, to its express 
abrogation by the emperor Hsiao Hui, there were only twenty-two years. 
We may believe, indeed, that vigorous efforts to carry the edict into 
effect would not be continued longer than the life of its author,-- that is, 
not for more than about three years. The calamity inflicted upon the
ancient Books of China by the House of Ch'in could not have 
approached to anything like a complete destruction of them. There 
would be no occasion for the scholars of the Han dynasty, in regard to 
the bulk of their ancient literature, to undertake more than the work of 
recension and editing. 
9. The idea of forgery by them on a large scale is out of the question. 
The catalogues of Liang Hsin enumerated more than 13,000 volumes of 
a larger or smaller size, the productions of nearly 600 different writers, 
and arranged in thirty-eight subdivisions of subjects [1]. In the third 
catalogue, the first subdivision contained the orthodox writers [2], to 
the number of fifty-three, with 836 Works or portions of their Works. 
Between Mencius and 
1 凡書å…-ç•¥, 三å八種, 五百ä¹åå…-å®¶, 
è¬ä¸‰åƒäºŒç™¾å…-ä¹å·. 
2 儒家者æµ. 
K'ung Chi, the grandson of Confucius, eight different authors have 
place. The second subdivision contained the Works of the Taoist school 
[1], amounting to 993 collections, from thirty-seven different authors. 
The sixth subdivision contained the Mohist writers [2], to the number 
of six, with their productions in 86 collections. I specify these two 
subdivisions, because they embrace the Works of schools or sects 
antagonistic    
    
		
	
	
	Continue reading on your phone by scaning this QR Code
	 	
	
	
	    Tip: The current page has been bookmarked automatically. If you wish to continue reading later, just open the 
Dertz Homepage, and click on the 'continue reading' link at the bottom of the page.