Notes and Queries, Number 38, July 20, 1850 | Page 2

it meant also
_to part_, or part with. A correspondent of Mr. Knight's suggests {114}
for the word delight in this passage, also, a new derivation; using de as
a negation, and _light (lux), delighted_, removed from the regions of
light. This is impossible; if we look at the context we shall see that it
not only contemplated no such thing, but that it is distinctly opposed to

it.
I am less inclined to entertain any doubt of the view I have taken being
correct, from the confirmation it receives in another passage of
Shakspeare, which runs as follows:
"If virtue no delighted beauty lack, Your son-in-law shows far more
fair than black."
_Othello_, Act i. Sc. 3.
Passing by the cool impertinence of one editor, who asserts that
Shakspeare frequently used the past for the present participle, and the
almost equally cool correction of another, who places the explanatory
note "*delightful" at the bottom of the page, I will merely remark that
the two latest editors of Shakspeare, having apparently nothing to say
on the subject, have very wisely said nothing. Yet, as we understand
the term "delighted," the passage surely needs explanation. We cannot
suppose that Shakspeare used epithets so weakening as "delighting" or
"delightful." The meaning of the passage would appear to be this: If
virtue be not wanting in beauty--such beauty as can belong to virtue,
not physical, but of a higher kind, and freed from all material
elements--then your son-in-law, black though he is, shows far more fair
than black, possessing, in fact, this abstract kind of beauty to that
degree that his colour is forgotten. In short, "delighted" here seems to
mean, lightened of all that is gross or unessential.
There is yet another instance in Cymbeline, which seems to bear a
similar construction:
"Whom best I love, I cross: to make my gifts The more delay'd,
delighted."
Act v. Sc. 4.
That is, "the more delighted;" the longer held back, the better worth
having; lightened of whatever might detract from their value, that is,
refined or purified. In making the remark here, that "delighted" refers

not to the recipient nor to the giver, but to the gifts, I pass by the
nonsense that the greatest master of the English language did not heed
the distinction between the past and the present participles, as not worth
a second thought.
The word appears to have had a distinct value of its own, and is not to
be explained by any other single word. If this be so, it could hardly
have been coined by Shakspeare. Though, possibly, it may never have
been much used, perhaps some of your correspondents may be able to
furnish other instances from other writers.
SAMUEL HICKSON.
St. John's Wood.
* * * * *
AUTHORS OF "THE ROLLIAD."
The subjoined list of the authors of _The Rolliad_, though less
complete than I could have wished, is, I believe, substantially correct,
and may, therefore, be acceptable to your readers. The names were
transcribed by me from a copy of the ninth edition of The Rolliad
(1791), still in the library at Sunninghill Park, in which they had been
recorded on the first page of the respective papers.
There seems to be no doubt that they were originally communicated by
Mr. George Ellis, who has always been considered as one of the most
talented contributors to The Rolliad. He also resided for many years at
Sunninghill, and was in habits of intimacy with the owners of the Park.
Your correspondent C. (Vol. ii., p. 43.) may remark that Lord John
Townshend's name occurs only twice in my list; but his Lordship may
have written some of the papers which are not in the Sunninghill
volume, as they appeared only in the editions of the work printed
subsequently to 1791, and are designated as Political Miscellanies.
Names of the Authors of the Rolliad.

Dedication to Kenyon Dr. Laurence. Family of the Rollos Tickell, &c.
Extract from Dedication General Fitzpatrick. Criticisms from the No.
Rolliad George Ellis 1 & 2. ---- Dr. Laurence 3. ---- Richardson 4. ----
General Fitzpatrick 5. ---- Dr. Laurence 6, 7, 8. ---- General Fitzpatrick
9. ---- Richardson 10 & 11. ---- General Fitzpatrick 12. Criticisms not
in the original, but probably written by Dr. Laurence 13 & 14.
Criticisms, &c. Part. ii. George Ellis 1 & 2. ---- Richardson 3 & 4. ----
General Fitzpatrick 5. Criticisms, not in the original Mr. Reid 6. ---- Dr.
Laurence 7.
Political Eclogues.
Rose Dr. Laurence. The Liars General Fitzpatrick. Margaret Nicholson
Mr. Adair. Charles Jenkinson George Ellis. Jekyl Lord John
Townshend.
Probationary Odes.
All the Preliminaries Mr. Tickell. Irregular Ode Mr. Tickell No. 1. Ode
to the New Year George Ellis 2. Ode Rev. H. Bate Dudley 3. ----
Richardson 4. Duan John