which critics of the highest intelligence will 
stand baffled and bewildered before the eccentricities of "Lavengro" 
and "The Romany Rye"--some critics treating the work as 
autobiography spoilt, and some as spoilt fiction--forget that while it is 
easy to open a locked door with a key, to open a locked door without a 
key is a very different undertaking. On the subject of autobiographies 
and the autobiographic method, I had several interesting talks with 
Borrow. I remember an especial one that took place on Wimbledon 
Common, on a certain autumn morning when I was pointing out to him 
the spot called Gypsy Ring. He was in a very communicative mood that 
day, and more amenable to criticism than he generally was. I had been 
speaking of certain bold coincidences in "Lavengro" and "The Romany 
Rye"--especially that of Lavengro's meeting by accident in the 
neighbourhood of Salisbury Plain the son of the very apple-woman of 
London Bridge with whom he had made friends, and also of such 
apparently manufactured situations as that of Lavengro's coming upon 
the man whom Wordsworth's poetry had sent into a deep slumber in a 
meadow. 
"What is an autobiography?" he asked. "Is it a mere record of the 
incidents of a man's life? or is it a picture of the man himself--his 
character, his soul?" 
Now this I think a very suggestive question of Borrow's with regard to 
himself and his own work. That he sat down to write his own life in 
"Lavengro" I know. He had no idea then of departing from the strict 
line of fact. Indeed, his letters to his friend Mr. John Murray would 
alone be sufficient to establish this in spite of his calling "Lavengro" a 
dream. In the first volume he did almost confine himself to matters of 
fact. But as he went on he clearly found that the ordinary tapestry into 
which Destiny had woven the incidents of his life were not tinged with
sufficient depth of colour to satisfy his sense of wonder; for, let it be 
remembered, that of love as a strong passion he had almost none. 
Surely no one but Lavengro could have lived in a dingle with a girl like 
Belle Berners, and passed the time in trying to teach her Armenian. 
Without strong passion no very deeply coloured life-tapestry can, in 
these unadventurous days, be woven. The manufactured incidents of 
which there are so many in "Lavengro" and "The Romany Rye," are 
introduced to give colour to a web of life that strong Passion had left 
untinged. But why? In order to flash upon the personality of Lavengro, 
and upon Lavengro's attitude towards the universe unseen as well as 
seen, a light more searching, as Borrow considered, than any picture of 
actual experience could have done. In other words, to build up the truth 
of the character of Lavengro, Borrow does not shrink from 
manipulating certain incidents and inventing others. And when he 
wishes to dive very boldly into the "abysmal deeps of personality," he 
speaks and moves partly behind the mask of some fictitious character, 
such as the man who touched for the evil chance, and such as the 
hypochondriac who taught himself Chinese to ward off despair, but 
could not tell the time of day by looking at the clock. This is not the 
place for me to enter more fully into this matter, but I am looking 
forward to a fitting occasion of showing whether or not "Lavengro" and 
"The Romany Rye" form a spiritual autobiography; and if they do, 
whether that autobiography does or does not surpass every other for 
absolute truth of spiritual representation. Meantime, let it be 
remembered by those who object to Borrow's method that, as I have 
just hinted, at the basis of his character was a deep sense of wonder. Let 
it be remembered that he was led to study the first of the many 
languages he taught himself--Irish--because there was, as he said, 
"something mysterious and uncommon in its use." Let it be 
remembered that it was this instinct of wonder, not the impulse of the 
mere poseur, that impelled him to make certain exaggerated statements 
about the characters themselves who are introduced into his books. 
 
III. ISOPEL BERNERS. 
For instance, the tall girl, Isopel Berners--the most vigorous sketch he
has given us--is perfect as she is adorable. Among heroines she stands 
quite alone; there is none other that is in the least like her. Yet she is in 
many of her qualities typical of a class. Among the very bravest of all 
human beings in the British Islands are, or were, the nomadic girls of 
the high road and the dingle. Their bravery is not only an inherited 
quality: it is in every way fostered by their mode of life. No tenderness 
from    
    
		
	
	
	Continue reading on your phone by scaning this QR Code
	 	
	
	
	    Tip: The current page has been bookmarked automatically. If you wish to continue reading later, just open the 
Dertz Homepage, and click on the 'continue reading' link at the bottom of the page.