the rainless character of the country, the only means of 
obtaining water for the crops is by irrigation, and where the fertilizing 
Nile water cannot be taken by means of canals, there cultivation ends 
and the desert begins. Before Egyptian civilization, properly so called, 
began, the valley was a great marsh through which the Nile found its 
way north to the sea. The half-savage, stone-using ancestors of the 
civilized Egyptians hunted wild fowl, crocodiles, and hippopotami in 
the marshy valley; but except in a few isolated settlements on 
convenient mounds here and there (the forerunners of the later villages), 
they did not live there. Their settlements were on the dry desert margin, 
and it was here, upon low tongues of desert hill jutting out into the 
plain, that they buried their dead. Their simple shallow graves were 
safe from the flood, and, but for the depredations of jackals and hyenas, 
here they have remained intact till our own day, and have yielded up to 
us the facts from which we have derived our knowledge of prehistoric 
Egypt. Thus it is that we know so much of the Egyptians of the Stone 
Age, while of their contemporaries in Mesopotamia we know nothing, 
nor is anything further likely to be discovered. 
But these desert cemeteries, with their crowds of oval shallow graves, 
covered by only a few inches of surface soil, in which the Neolithic 
Egyptians lie crouched up with their flint implements and polished 
pottery beside them, are but monuments of the later age of prehistoric 
Egypt. Long before the Neolithic Egyptian hunted his game in the 
marshes, and here and there essayed the work of reclamation for the 
purposes of an incipient agriculture, a far older race inhabited the 
valley of the Nile. The written records of Egyptian civilization go back 
four thousand years before Christ, or earlier, and the Neolithic Age of 
Egypt must go back to a period several thousand years before that. But 
we can now go back much further still, to the Palaeolithic Age of Egypt. 
At a time when Europe was still covered by the ice and snows of the 
Glacial Period, and man fought as an equal, hardly yet as a superior, 
with cave-bear and mammoth, the Palaeolithic Egyptians lived on the 
banks of the Nile. Their habitat was doubtless the desert slopes, often, 
too, the plateaus themselves; but that they lived entirely upon the
plateaus, high up above the Nile marsh, is improbable. There, it is true, 
we find their flint implements, the great pear-shaped weapons of the 
types of Chelles, St. Acheul, and Le Moustier, types well known to all 
who are acquainted with the flint implements of the "Drift" in Europe. 
And it is there that the theory, generally accepted hitherto, has placed 
the habitat of the makers and users of these implements. 
The idea was that in Palaeolithic days, contemporary with the Glacial 
Age of Northern Europe and America, the climate of Egypt was 
entirely different from that of later times and of to-day. Instead of dry 
desert, the mountain plateaus bordering the Nile valley were supposed 
to have been then covered with forest, through which flowed countless 
streams to feed the river below. It was suggested that remains of these 
streams were to be seen in the side ravines, or wadis, of the Nile valley, 
which run up from the low desert on the river level into the hills on 
either hand. These wadis undoubtedly show extensive traces of strong 
water action; they curve and twist as the streams found their easiest 
way to the level through the softer strata, they are heaped up with great 
water-worn boulders, they are hollowed out where waterfalls once fell. 
They have the appearance of dry watercourses, exactly what any 
mountain burns would be were the water-supply suddenly cut off for 
ever, the climate altered from rainy to eternal sun-glare, and every plant 
and tree blasted, never to grow again. Acting on the supposition that 
this idea was a correct one, most observers have concluded that the 
climate of Egypt in remote periods was very different from the dry, 
rainless one now obtaining. To provide the water for the wadi streams, 
heavy rainfall and forests are desiderated. They were easily supplied, 
on the hypothesis. Forests clothed the mountain plateaus, heavy rains 
fell, and the water rushed down to the Nile, carving out the great 
watercourses which remain to this day, bearing testimony to the truth. 
And the flints, which the Palaeolithic inhabitants of the plateau-forests 
made and used, still lie on the now treeless and sun-baked desert 
surface. 
[Illustration: 007.jpg THE BED OF AN ANCIENT WATERCOURSE 
IN THE WADIYÊN, THEBES.]
This is certainly a very weak conclusion. In fact, it seriously damages 
the whole argument, the water-courses to the contrary notwithstanding. 
The palæoliths are there.    
    
		
	
	
	Continue reading on your phone by scaning this QR Code
 
	 	
	
	
	    Tip: The current page has been bookmarked automatically. If you wish to continue reading later, just open the 
Dertz Homepage, and click on the 'continue reading' link at the bottom of the page.
	    
	    
