Ancienne des Peuples des l'Orient 
Classique_, in 1895, Egyptian history, properly so called, still began 
with the Pyramid-builders, Sne-feru, Khufu, and Khafra (Cheops and 
Chephren), and the legendary lists of earlier kings preserved at Abydos 
and Sakkara were still quoted as the only source of knowledge of the 
time before the IVth Dynasty. Of a prehistoric Egypt nothing was 
known, beyond a few flint flakes gathered here and there upon the 
desert plateaus, which might or might not tell of an age when the 
ancestors of the Pyramid-builders knew only the stone tools and 
weapons of the primeval savage. 
Now, however, the veil which has hidden the beginnings of Egyptian 
civilization from us has been lifted, and we see things, more or less, as 
they actually were, unobscured by the traditions of a later day. Until the 
last few years nothing of the real beginnings of history in either Egypt 
or Mesopotamia had been found; legend supplied the only material for 
the reconstruction of the earliest history of the oldest civilized nations 
of the globe. Nor was it seriously supposed that any relics of prehistoric 
Egypt or Mesopotamia ever would be found. The antiquity of the 
known history of these countries already appeared so great that nobody 
took into consideration the possibility of our discovering a prehistoric 
Egypt or Mesopotamia; the idea was too remote from practical work. 
And further, civilization in these countries had lasted so long that it 
seemed more than probable that all traces of their prehistoric age had 
long since been swept away. Yet the possibility, which seemed hardly 
worth a moment's consideration in 1895, is in 1905 an assured reality, 
at least as far as Egypt is concerned. Prehistoric Babylonia has yet to be 
discovered. It is true, for example, that at Mukay-yar, the site of ancient 
Ur of the Chaldees, burials in earthenware coffins, in which the 
skeletons lie in the doubled-up position characteristic of Neolithic 
interments, have been found; but there is no doubt whatever that these 
are burials of a much later date, belonging, quite possibly, to the 
Parthian period. Nothing that may rightfully be termed prehistoric has
yet been found in the Euphrates valley, whereas in Egypt prehistoric 
antiquities are now almost as well known and as well represented in our 
museums as are the prehistoric antiquities of Europe and America. 
With the exception of a few palasoliths from the surface of the Syrian 
desert, near the Euphrates valley, not a single implement of the Age of 
Stone has yet been found in Southern Mesopotamia, whereas Egypt has 
yielded to us the most perfect examples of the flint-knapper's art known, 
flint tools and weapons more beautiful than the finest that Europe and 
America can show. The reason is not far to seek. Southern 
Mesopotamia is an alluvial country, and the ancient cities, which 
doubtless mark the sites of the oldest settlements in the land, are 
situated in the alluvial marshy plain between the Tigris and the 
Euphrates; so that all traces of the Neolithic culture of the country 
would seem to have disappeared, buried deep beneath city-mounds, 
clay and marsh. It is the same in the Egyptian Delta, a similar country; 
and here no traces of the prehistoric culture of Egypt have been found. 
The attempt to find them was made last year at Buto, which is known 
to be one of the most antique centres of civilization, and probably was 
one of the earliest settlements in Egypt, but without success. The 
infiltration of water had made excavation impossible and had no doubt 
destroyed everything belonging to the most ancient settlement. It is not 
going too far to predict that exactly the same thing will be found by any 
explorer who tries to discover a Neolithic stratum beneath a city-mound 
of Babylonia. There is little hope that prehistoric Chaldæa will ever be 
known to us. But in Egypt the conditions are different. The Delta is like 
Babylonia, it is true; but in the Upper Nile valley the river flows down 
with but a thin border of alluvial land on either side, through the rocky 
and hilly desert, the dry Sahara, where rain falls but once in two or 
three years. Antiquities buried in this soil in the most remote ages are 
preserved intact as they were first interred, until the modern 
investigator comes along to look for them. And it is on the desert 
margin of the valley that the remains of prehistoric Egypt have been 
found. That is the reason for their perfect preservation till our own day, 
and why we know prehistoric Egypt so well. 
The chief work of Egyptian civilization was the proper irrigation of the
alluvial soil, the turning of marsh into cultivated fields, and the 
reclamation of land from the desert for the purposes of agriculture. 
Owing to    
    
		
	
	
	Continue reading on your phone by scaning this QR Code
 
	 	
	
	
	    Tip: The current page has been bookmarked automatically. If you wish to continue reading later, just open the 
Dertz Homepage, and click on the 'continue reading' link at the bottom of the page.
	    
	    
