was concerned) were those of two English newspapers, but even they 
were inaccurate in several matters of detail. For instance, the lady 
currently spoken of as Mme. Zola was my own wife, who, it so 
happens, is a Frenchwoman. At a later stage the 'Daily Mail' hit the nail 
on the head by signalling M. Zola's presence at the Oatlands Park Hotel; 
but so many reports having already proved erroneous, the 'Mail' was by 
no means certain of the accuracy of its information, and the dubitative 
form in which its statement was couched prevented the matter from 
going further. 
At last a period of comparative quiet set in, and though gentlemen of 
the Press were still anxious to extract information from me, nothing 
further appeared in print as to M. Zola's whereabouts until the 'Times' 
Paris correspondent, M. de Blowitz, contributed to his paper, early in 
the present year, a most detailed and amusing account of M. Zola's 
flight from France and his subsequent movements in exile. In this 
narrative one found Mme. Zola equipping her husband with a 
nightgown for his perilous journey abroad, and secreting bank notes in 
the lining of his garments. Then, carrying a slip of paper in his hand, 
the novelist had been passed on through London from policeman to 
policeman, until he took train to a village in Warwickshire, where the 
little daughter of an innkeeper had recognised him from seeing his 
portrait in one of the illustrated newspapers. 
There was something also about his acquaintance with the vicar of the 
locality and a variety of other particulars, all of which helped to make 
up as pretty a romance as the 'Times' readers had been favoured with
for many a day. But excellent as was M. de Blowitz's narrative from the 
romantic standpoint his information was sadly inaccurate. Of his bona 
fides there can be no doubt, but some of M. Zola's friends are rather 
partial to a little harmless joking, and it is evident that a trap was laid 
for the shrewd correspondent of the 'Times,' and that he, in an 
unguarded moment, fell into it. 
On the incidents which immediately preceded M. Zola's departure from 
France I shall here be brief; these incidents are only known to me by 
statements I have had from M. and Mme. Zola themselves. But the rest 
is well within my personal knowledge, as one of the first things which 
M. Zola did on arriving in England was to communicate with me and in 
certain respects place himself in my hands. 
This, then, is a plain unvarnished narrative--firstly, of the steps that I 
took in the matter, in conjunction with a friend, who is by profession a 
solicitor; and, secondly, of the principal incidents which marked M. 
Zola's views on some matters of interest, as imparted by him to me at 
various times. But, ultimately, M. Zola will himself pen his own private 
impressions, and on these I shall not trespass. It is because, according 
to his own statements to me, his book on his English impressions 
(should he write it) could not possibly appear for another twelve 
months, that I have put these notes together. 
The real circumstances, then, of M. Zola's departure from France are 
these: On July 18, the day fixed for his second trial at Versailles, he left 
Paris in a livery-stable brougham hired for the occasion at a cost of fifty 
francs. His companion was his _fidus Achates_, M. Fernand Desmoulin, 
the painter, who had already acted as his bodyguard at the time of the 
great trial in Paris. Versailles was reached in due course, and the 
judicial proceedings began under circumstances which have been 
chronicled too often to need mention here. When M. Zola had retired 
from the court, allowing judgment to go against him by default, he was 
joined by Maitre Labori, his counsel, and the pair of them returned to 
Paris in the vehicle which had brought M. Zola from the city in the 
morning. M. Desmoulin found a seat in another carriage. 
The brougham conveying Messrs. Zola and Labori was driven to the 
residence of M. Georges Charpentier, the eminent publisher, in the 
Avenue du Bois de Boulogne, and there they were presently joined by 
M. Georges Clemenceau, Mme. Zola, and a few others. It was then that
the necessity of leaving France was pressed upon M. Zola, who, though 
he found the proposal little to his liking, eventually signified his 
acquiescence. 
The points urged in favour of his departure abroad were as follows: He 
must do his utmost to avoid personal service of the judgment given 
against him by default, as the Government was anxious to cast him into 
prison and thus stifle his voice. If such service were effected the law 
would only allow him a few days    
    
		
	
	
	Continue reading on your phone by scaning this QR Code
	 	
	
	
	    Tip: The current page has been bookmarked automatically. If you wish to continue reading later, just open the 
Dertz Homepage, and click on the 'continue reading' link at the bottom of the page.