am perhaps nearer the point in saying that this 
last strikes me at present as most characterised by the happy features that WERE, under 
my first and most blest illusion, to have contributed to it. I meet them all, as I renew 
acquaintance, I mourn for them all as I remount the stream, the absent values, the
palpable voids, the missing links, the mocking shadows, that reflect, taken together, the 
early bloom of one's good faith. Such cases are of course far from abnormal--so far from 
it that some acute mind ought surely to have worked out by this time the "law" of the 
degree in which the artist's energy fairly depends on his fallibility. How much and how 
often, and in what connexions and with what almost infinite variety, must he be a dupe, 
that of his prime object, to be at all measurably a master, that of his actual substitute for 
it--or in other words at all appreciably to exist? He places, after an earnest survey, the 
piers of his bridge--he has at least sounded deep enough, heaven knows, for their brave 
position; yet the bridge spans the stream, after the fact, in apparently complete 
independence of these properties, the principal grace of the original design. THEY were 
an illusion, for their necessary hour; but the span itself, whether of a single arch or of 
many, seems by the oddest chance in the world to be a reality; since, actually, the rueful 
builder, passing under it, (xiv) sees figures and hears sounds above: he makes out, with 
his heart in his throat, that it bears and is positively being "used." 
The building-up of Kate Croy's consciousness to the capacity for the load little by little to 
be laid on it was, by way of example, to have been a matter of as many hundred 
close-packed bricks as there are actually poor dozens. The image of her so compromised 
and compromising father was all effectively to have pervaded her life, was in a certain 
particular way to have tampered with her spring; by which I mean that the shame and the 
irritation and the depression, the general poisonous influence of him, were to have been 
SHOWN, with a truth beyond the compass even of one's most emphasised "word of 
honour" for it, to do these things. But where do we find him, at this time of day, save in a 
beggarly scene or two which scarce arrives at the dignity of functional reference? He but 
"looks in," poor beautiful dazzling, damning apparition that he was to have been; he sees 
his place so taken, his company so little missed, that, cocking again that fine form of hat 
which has yielded him for so long his one effective cover, he turns away with a whistle of 
indifference that nobly misrepresents the deepest disappointment of his life. One's poor 
word of honour has HAD to pass muster for the show. Every one, in short, was to have 
enjoyed so much better a chance that, like stars of the theatre condescending to oblige, 
they have had to take small parts, to content themselves with minor identities, in order to 
come on at all. I haven't the heart now, I confess, to adduce the detail of so many lapsed 
importances; the explanation of most of which, after all, I take to have been in the crudity 
of a truth beating full upon me through these reconsiderations, the odd inveteracy with 
which picture, at almost any turn, is jealous of drama, and drama (though on the whole 
with a greater patience, I think) suspicious of picture. Between them, no doubt, they do 
much for the theme; yet each baffles insidiously the other's ideal and eats round the edges 
of its position; each is too ready to say "I can take the thing for 'done' only when done in 
MY way." The residuum of comfort for the witness of these broils is of course 
meanwhile in the convenient reflexion, invented for him in the twilight of time and the 
infancy of art by the Angel, not to say by the Demon, of Compromise, that nothing is so 
easy to "do" as not to be thankful for almost any stray help in its getting done. It wasn't, 
after this fashion, by making good one's dream of Lionel Croy that my structure was to 
stand on its feet--any more than it was by letting him go that I was to be left irretrievably 
lamenting. The who and the what, the how and the why, the whence and the whither of 
Merton Densher, these, no less, were quantities and attributes that should have danced 
about him with the antique grace of nymphs and fauns circling round a bland Hermes and
crowning him with flowers. One's main anxiety, for each one's    
    
		
	
	
	Continue reading on your phone by scaning this QR Code
 
	 	
	
	
	    Tip: The current page has been bookmarked automatically. If you wish to continue reading later, just open the 
Dertz Homepage, and click on the 'continue reading' link at the bottom of the page.
	    
	    
