Southampton, when he set out for London. During this visit, says Mary, 
her father was sometimes "very rude" to his guest, which, in the 
circumstances, is not surprising. 
Meanwhile, on 1st March, 1748, the Commissary Court had decreed 
William Henry Cranstoun and Anne Murray to be man and wife and 
the child of the marriage to be their lawful issue, and had decerned the 
captain to pay the lady an annuity of £40 sterling for her own aliment 
and £10 for their daughter's, so long as she should be maintained by her 
mother, and further had found him liable in expenses, amounting to 
£100. The proceedings disclose a very ugly incident. Shortly after 
leaving his wife, as before narrated, Cranstoun wrote to her that his sole 
chance of promotion in the Army depended on his appearing unmarried, 
and with much persuasion he at length prevailed upon her to copy a 
letter, framed by him, to the effect that she had never been his wife. 
Once possessed of this document in her handwriting, the little 
scoundrel sent copies of it to his own and his wife's relatives in 
Scotland, whereby she suffered much obloquy and neglect, and when 
that unhappy lady raised her action of declarator, with peculiar 
baseness he lodged the letter in process. Fortunately, she had preserved 
the original draft, together with her faithless husband's letters 
thereanent. This judgment was, for the gallant defender, now on 
half-pay, a veritable _débâcle_, and we may be sure that the confiding 
Blandys would have heard no word of it from him; but Mrs. Cranstoun, 
having learned something of the game her spouse was playing at 
Henley, herself wrote to Mr. Blandy, announcing the decision of the 
Commissaries and sending for his information a copy of the decree in
her favour. This, surely, should have opened the eyes even of a 
provincial attorney, but Cranstoun, while admitting the fact, induced 
him to believe, the wish being father to the thought, that the Court of 
first instance, as was not unprecedented, had erred, and that he was 
advised, with good hope of success, to appeal against the judgment to 
the Court of Session. Finally to dispose of the captain's legal business, 
it may now be said that the appeal was in due course of time dismissed, 
and the decision of the Commissaries affirmed. Thus the marriage was 
as valid as Scots law could make it. True, as is pointed out by one of 
his biographers, he might have appealed to the House of Lords, "but did 
not, as it seldom happens that they reverse a decree of the Lords of 
Session!" Nowadays, we may assume, Cranstoun would have taken the 
risk. The result of this protracted litigation was never known to Mr. 
Blandy. 
In the spring of 1749, "a few months" after Cranstoun's departure, Miss 
Blandy and her mother went to London for the purpose of taking 
medical advice as to the old lady's health, which was still unsatisfactory. 
They lived while in town with Mrs. Blandy's brother, Henry Stevens, 
the Serjeant, in Doctors' Commons. Cranstoun, with whom Mary had 
been in constant correspondence, waited upon the ladies the morning 
after their arrival, and came daily during their visit. On one occasion, 
Mary states, he brought his elder brother, the reigning baron, to call 
upon them. This gentleman was James, sixth Lord Cranstoun, who had 
succeeded to the title on the death of his father in 1727. What was his 
lordship's attitude regarding the "perplexing affair" in Scotland she 
does not inform us; but Mr. Serjeant Stevens refused to countenance 
the attentions of the entangled captain. Mrs. Blandy wept because her 
brother would not invite Cranstoun to dinner, and it was arranged that, 
to avoid "affronts," she should receive the captain's visits in her own 
room. But her friend Mrs. Pocock of Turville Court had a house in St. 
James's Square. "Hither Mr. Cranstoun perpetually came," says Mary, 
"when he understood that I was there;" so they were able to dispense 
with the Serjeant's hospitality. One day she and her mother were bidden 
to dine at Mrs. Pocock's, to meet my Lord Garnock (the future Lord 
Crauford). Cranstoun and their hostess called for them in a coach, and 
in the Strand whom should the party encounter but Mr. Blandy, come
to town on business. "For God's sake, Mrs. Pocock, what do you with 
this rubbish?" cried the attorney, stopping the coach. "Rubbish!" quoth 
the lady, "Your wife, your daughter, and one who may be your son?" 
"Ay," replied the old man, "They are very well matched; 'tis a pity they 
should ever be asunder!" "God grant they never may," simpered the 
ugly lover; "don't you say amen, papa?" But amen, as appears, stuck in 
Mr. Blandy's throat: he declined Mrs. Pocock's invitation to join them, 
and    
    
		
	
	
	Continue reading on your phone by scaning this QR Code
	 	
	
	
	    Tip: The current page has been bookmarked automatically. If you wish to continue reading later, just open the 
Dertz Homepage, and click on the 'continue reading' link at the bottom of the page.