in 1874 and En Fallit
(A Bankruptcy) in 1875. The latter especially was hailed as the earliest 
raising of the veil upon Norwegian domestic life, and as a remarkable 
effort in the detection of drama in the commonplace. Before he wrote 
these, Björnson had again been for some years out of Norway; and, as 
in the case of Ibsen, who began the writing of his "social dramas" when 
in voluntary exile, absence seemed to enable him to observe the 
familiar from a new standpoint and in the proper perspective. 
After his first successes in this line, when his plays (and his poems and 
tales to an equal extent) had made him popular and honoured among 
his own people, Björnson settled at Aulestad, which remained his home 
for the rest of his life. He also became a doughty controversialist in 
social and religious matters, and the first outcome of this phase was his 
play Leonarda (the second in this volume), which was first performed 
in 1879, to be followed by Det ny System (The New System) later in 
the same year. These works aroused keen controversy, but were not 
such popular stage successes as his earlier plays. Moreover, about this 
time, on his return from a visit to America, he plunged into the vortex 
of political controversy as an aggressive radical. He was a vigorous and 
very persuasive orator; and in that capacity, as well as in that of writer 
of political articles and essays, was an uncompromising foe to the 
opportunist theories which he held to be degrading the public life of his 
country. The opposition he aroused by his fearless championship of 
whatever he considered a rightful cause was so bitter that he was 
eventually obliged to retire from Norway for two or three years. So 
much did this temporarily affect his literary reputation at home, that 
when, in 1883, he had written En Hanske (A Gauntlet--the third play 
here translated) he found at first considerable difficulty in getting it 
performed. Later, however, he became a political hero to a large section 
of his compatriots, and by degrees won back fully the place he had 
occupied in their hearts. He enthusiastically espoused the cause of the 
projected separation from Sweden, though when that matter came to a 
crisis he exercised an invaluable influence on the side of moderation. 
For the remainder of his life he continued to be prolific in literary 
production, with an ever increasing renown amongst European men of 
letters, and an ever deepening personal hold upon the affections of his
fellow-countrymen. In 1903 he was awarded the Nobel prize for 
literature. During his later years he, like Ibsen, was a determined 
opponent of the movement to replace the Dano-Norwegian language, 
which had hitherto been the literary vehicle of Norwegian writers, by 
the "Bonde-Maal"--or "Ny Norsk" ("New Norwegian"), as it has lately 
been termed. This is an artificial hybrid composed from the Norwegian 
peasant dialects, by the use of which certain misguided patriots were 
(and unfortunately still are) anxious to dissociate their literature from 
that of Denmark. Björnson, and with him most of the soberer spirits 
amongst Norwegian writers, had realised that the door which had so 
long shut out Norway from the literature of Europe must be, as he put it, 
opened from the inside; and he rightly considered that the ill-judged 
"Bonde-Maal" movement could only have the result of wedging the 
door more tightly shut. 
He died, in April 1910, in Paris, where for some years he had always 
spent his winters, and was buried at home with every mark of honour 
and regret, a Norwegian warship having been sent to convey his 
remains back to his own land. 
He was a man of very lovable personality and of the kindest heart; 
easily moved by any tale of oppression or injustice, and of wide-armed 
(albeit sometimes in judicious) generosity; more apt, in the affairs of 
everyday life, to be governed by his heart than by his head, and as 
simple as a child in many matters. His wife was an ideal helpmate to 
him, and their family life very happy. 
The Newly-Married Couple (1865) offers a considerable contrast to the 
other two plays here presented. It belongs to the school of Scribe and 
the "soliloquy," and the author avails himself of the recognised 
dramatic conventions of the day. At the same time, though the 
characters may be conventional in type, they are, thanks to Björnson's 
sense of humour, alive; and the theme of the estrangement and 
reconciliation of the "newly-married couple" is treated with delicacy 
and charm. It is true that it is almost unbelievable that the hero could be 
so stupid as to allow the "confidante" to accompany his young wife 
when he at last succeeds in wresting her from her parents' jealous
clutches; but, on the    
    
		
	
	
	Continue reading on your phone by scaning this QR Code
	 	
	
	
	    Tip: The current page has been bookmarked automatically. If you wish to continue reading later, just open the 
Dertz Homepage, and click on the 'continue reading' link at the bottom of the page.