Ireland were to be permanently 
segregated from childhood to manhood in different schools, different 
universities, where early friendships, the most intimate and familiar of
any, could never be made, and ideas never interchanged except through 
public controversy, the barrier between the two Irish races would be 
infinitely difficult to break down, and no scheme of Irish government 
could be conceived which would not seem like a triumph to one of 
them and bondage to the other. The views of the Young Irelanders did 
not prevail, and Ireland as a nation has paid the penalty for two 
generations, and will probably pay it for many a day to come. It may, 
of course, be argued that religious interests are paramount, and that 
these are incompatible with a scheme of mixed education. This is not 
the place to debate such a question, nor can anyone quarrel with a 
decision arrived at on such grounds. But let it be arrived at with a clear 
understanding of the certain consequences, and let it be admitted that 
when Davis saw the wreck of the scheme for united education he felt 
truly that a long and perhaps, for many generations, irretrievable step 
was being taken away from the road to nationhood. 
But after this despondent reflection, let us cheer ourselves by setting 
the proud and moving words with which Duffy concludes his account 
of the transactions in the _Life of Davis_:-- 
"I have not tacked to any transaction in this narrative the moral which it 
suggests; the thoughtful reader prefers to draw his own conclusions. 
But for once I ask those to whom this book is dedicated to note the 
conduct of Catholic young men in a mortal contest. The hereditary 
leader of the people, sure to be backed by the whole force of the 
unreflecting masses, and supported on this occasion by the bulk of the 
national clergy--a man of genius, an historic man wielding an authority 
made august by a life's services, a solemn moral authority with which it 
is ridiculous to compare the purely political influence of anyone who 
has succeeded him as a tribune of the people--was against Thomas 
Davis, and able, no one doubted, to overwhelm him and his 
sympathisers in political ruin. A public career might be closed for all of 
us; our journal might be extinguished; we were already denounced as 
intriguers and infidels; it was quite certain that, by-and-by, we would 
be described as hirelings of the Castle. But Davis was right; and of all 
his associates, not one man flinched from his side--not one man. A 
crisis bringing character to a sharper test has never arisen in our history,
nor can ever arise; and the conduct of these men, it seems to me, is 
some guarantee how their successors would act in any similar 
emergency." 
The year 1845 was loaded with disaster for Ireland. It saw the defeat of 
the Education scheme; it saw the advancing shadow of the awful 
calamity in which the Repeal movement, the Young Irelanders, and 
everything of hope and promise that lived and moved in Ireland were to 
perish--and it saw the death of Thomas Davis. 
He had had an attack of scarlet fever, from which he seemed to be 
recovering, but a relapse took place--owing, perhaps, to incautious 
exposure before his strength had returned--and, in the early dawn of 
September 15th, he passed away in his mother's house. The years of his 
life were thirty-one; his public life had lasted but for three. His funeral 
was marked by an extraordinary outburst of grief and affection, which 
was shared by men of all creeds, all classes, all political camps in 
Ireland. 
No mourning, indeed, could be too deep for the withdrawal at such a 
moment of such a leader from the task to which he had consecrated his 
life. That task was far more than the winning of political independence 
for his country. Davis united in himself, in a degree which has never 
been known before or since, the spirit of two great originators in Irish 
history--the spirit of Swift and the spirit of Berkeley--of Swift, the 
champion of his country against foreign oppression; of Berkeley, who 
bade her turn her thoughts inward, who summoned her to cultivate the 
faculties and use the liberties she already possessed for the 
development of her resources and the strengthening of her national 
character. Davis's best and most original work was educative rather 
than aggressive. He often wrote, as Duffy says, "in a tone of strict and 
haughty discipline designed to make the people fit to use and fit to 
enjoy liberty." No one recognised more fully than he the regenerative 
value of political forms, but his ideal was never that of a millennium to 
be won by Act of Parliament--he was ever on the watch for some    
    
		
	
	
	Continue reading on your phone by scaning this QR Code
 
	 	
	
	
	    Tip: The current page has been bookmarked automatically. If you wish to continue reading later, just open the 
Dertz Homepage, and click on the 'continue reading' link at the bottom of the page.
	    
	    
