the Duke of 
Portland's friends in the House of Commons, for the purpose of taking
their opinion on the conduct to be pursued in Parliament at that critical 
juncture. He concerted his measures (if with any persons at all) with the 
friends of Lord Lansdowne, and those calling themselves Friends of the 
People, and others not in the smallest degree attached to the Duke of 
Portland; by which conduct he wilfully gave up (in my opinion) all 
pretensions to be considered as of that party, and much more to be 
considered as the leader and mouth of it in the House of Commons. 
This could not give much encouragement to those who had been 
separated from Mr. Fox, on account of his conduct on the first 
proclamation, to rejoin that party. 
5. Not having consulted any of the Duke of Portland's party in the 
House of Commons,--and not having consulted them, because he had 
reason to know that the course he had resolved to pursue would be 
highly disagreeable to them,--he represented the alarm, which was a 
second time given and taken, in still more invidious colors than those in 
which he painted the alarms of the former year. He described those 
alarms in this manner, although the cause of them was then grown far 
less equivocal and far more urgent. He even went so far as to treat the 
supposition of the growth of a Jacobin spirit in England as a libel on the 
nation. As to the danger from abroad, on the first day of the session he 
said little or nothing upon the subject. He contented himself with 
defending the ruling factions in France, and with accusing the public 
councils of this kingdom of every sort of evil design on the liberties of 
the people,--declaring distinctly, strongly, and precisely, that the whole 
danger of the nation was from the growth of the power of the crown. 
The policy of this declaration was obvious. It was in subservience to 
the general plan of disabling us from taking any steps against France. 
To counteract the alarm given by the progress of Jacobin arms and 
principles, he endeavored to excite an opposite alarm concerning the 
growth of the power of the crown. If that alarm should prevail, he knew 
that the nation never would be brought by arms to oppose the growth of 
the Jacobin empire: because it is obvious that war does, in its very 
nature, necessitate the Commons considerably to strengthen the hands 
of government; and if that strength should itself be the object of terror, 
we could have no war. 
6. In the extraordinary and violent speeches of that day, he attributed all 
the evils which the public had suffered to the proclamation of the
preceding summer; though he spoke in presence of the Duke of 
Portland's own son, the Marquis of Tichfield, who had seconded the 
address on that proclamation, and in presence of the Duke of Portland's 
brother, Lord Edward Bentinck, and several others of his best friends 
and nearest relations. 
7. On that day, that is, on the 13th of December, 1792, he proposed an 
amendment to the address, which stands on the journals of the House, 
and which is, perhaps, the most extraordinary record which ever did 
stand upon them. To introduce this amendment, he not only struck out 
the part of the proposed address which alluded to insurrections, upon 
the ground of the objections which he took to the legality of calling 
together Parliament, (objections which I must ever think litigious and 
sophistical,) but he likewise struck out that part which related to the 
cabals and conspiracies of the French faction in England, although 
their practices and correspondences were of public notoriety. Mr. 
Cooper and Mr. Watt had been deputed from Manchester to the 
Jacobins. These ambassadors were received by them as British 
representatives. Other deputations of English had been received at the 
bar of the National Assembly. They had gone the length of giving 
supplies to the Jacobin armies; and they, in return, had received 
promises of military assistance to forward their designs in England. A 
regular correspondence for fraternizing the two nations had also been 
carried on by societies in London with a great number of the Jacobin 
societies in France. This correspondence had also for its object the 
pretended improvement of the British Constitution. What is the most 
remarkable, and by much the more mischievous part of his proceedings 
that day, Mr. Fox likewise struck out everything in the address which 
_related to the tokens of ambition given by France, her aggressions 
upon our allies, and the sudden and dangerous growth of her power 
upon every side_; and instead of all those weighty, and, at that time, 
necessary matters, by which the House of Commons was (in a crisis 
such as    
    
		
	
	
	Continue reading on your phone by scaning this QR Code
 
	 	
	
	
	    Tip: The current page has been bookmarked automatically. If you wish to continue reading later, just open the 
Dertz Homepage, and click on the 'continue reading' link at the bottom of the page.
	    
	    
