a broadcast swing of his arm he squanders over his 
Indian field a sum far greater than the clear produce of the whole 
hereditary revenue of the kingdom of Ireland.[4] 
Strange as this scheme of conduct in ministry is, and inconsistent with 
all just policy, it is still true to itself, and faithful to its own perverted 
order. Those who are bountiful to crimes will be rigid to merit and 
penurious to service. Their penury is even held out as a blind and cover 
to their prodigality. The economy of injustice is to furnish resources for 
the fund of corruption. Then they pay off their protection to great 
crimes and great criminals by being inexorable to the paltry frailties of 
little men; and these modern flagellants are sure, with a rigid fidelity, to 
whip their own enormities on the vicarious back of every small 
offender. 
It is to draw your attention to economy of quite another order, it is to 
animadvert on offences of a far different description, that my honorable 
friend has brought before you the motion of this day. It is to perpetuate 
the abuses which are subverting the fabric of your empire, that the 
motion is opposed. It is, therefore, with reason (and if he has power to 
carry himself through, I commend his prudence) that the right 
honorable gentleman makes his stand at the very outset, and boldly 
refuses all Parliamentary information. Let him admit but one step
towards inquiry, and he is undone. You must be ignorant, or he cannot 
be safe. But before his curtain is let down, and the shades of eternal 
night shall veil our Eastern dominions from our view, permit me, Sir, to 
avail myself of the means which were furnished in anxious and 
inquisitive times to demonstrate out of this single act of the present 
minister what advantages you are to derive from permitting the greatest 
concern of this nation to be separated from the cognizance, and 
exempted even out of the competence, of Parliament. The greatest body 
of your revenue, your most numerous armies, your most important 
commerce, the richest sources of your public credit, (contrary to every 
idea of the known, settled policy of England,) are on the point of being 
converted into a mystery of state. You are going to have one half of the 
globe hid even from the common liberal curiosity of an English 
gentleman. Here a grand revolution commences. Mark the period, and 
mark the circumstances. In most of the capital changes that are 
recorded in the principles and system of any government, a public 
benefit of some kind or other has been pretended. The revolution 
commenced in something plausible, in something which carried the 
appearance at least of punishment of delinquency or correction of abuse. 
But here, in the very moment of the conversion of a department of 
British government into an Indian mystery, and in the very act in which 
the change commences, a corrupt private interest is set up in direct 
opposition to the necessities of the nation. A diversion is made of 
millions of the public money from the public treasury to a private purse. 
It is not into secret negotiations for war, peace, or alliance that the 
House of Commons is forbidden to inquire. It is a matter of account; it 
is a pecuniary transaction; it is the demand of a suspected steward upon 
ruined tenants and an embarrassed master that the Commons of Great 
Britain are commanded not to inspect. The whole tenor of the right 
honorable gentleman's argument is consonant to the nature of his policy. 
The system of concealment is fostered by a system of falsehood. False 
facts, false colors, false names of persons and things, are its whole 
support. 
Sir, I mean to follow the right honorable gentleman over that field of 
deception, clearing what he has purposely obscured, and fairly stating 
what it was necessary for him to misrepresent. For this purpose, it is 
necessary you should know, with some degree of distinctness, a little of
the locality, the nature, the circumstances, the magnitude of the 
pretended debts on which this marvellous donation is founded, as well 
as of the persons from whom and by whom it is claimed. 
Madras, with its dependencies, is the second (but with a long interval, 
the second) member of the British empire in the East. The trade of that 
city, and of the adjacent territory, was not very long ago among the 
most flourishing in Asia. But since the establishment of the British 
power it has wasted away under an uniform gradual decline, insomuch 
that in the year 1779 not one merchant of eminence was to be found in 
the whole country.[5] During this period of decay, about six hundred 
thousand sterling pounds a year have been drawn off by    
    
		
	
	
	Continue reading on your phone by scaning this QR Code
	 	
	
	
	    Tip: The current page has been bookmarked automatically. If you wish to continue reading later, just open the 
Dertz Homepage, and click on the 'continue reading' link at the bottom of the page.