execution; and the motion on your paper presses him 
only to complete a proper plan, which, by some unfortunate and 
unaccountable error, he had left unfinished. 
I hope, Sir, the honorable gentleman who spoke last is thoroughly 
satisfied, and satisfied out of the proceedings of ministry on their own
favorite act, that his fears from a repeal are groundless. If he is not, I 
leave him, and the noble lord who sits by him, to settle the matter as 
well as they can together; for, if the repeal of American taxes destroys 
all our government in America,--he is the man!--and he is the worst of 
all the repealers, because he is the last. 
But I hear it rung continually in my ears, now and formerly,--"The 
preamble! what will become of the preamble, if you repeal this tax?"--I 
am sorry to be compelled so often to expose the calamities and 
disgraces of Parliament. The preamble of this law, standing as it now 
stands, has the lie direct given to it by the provisionary part of the act: 
if that can be called provisionary which makes no provision. I should 
be afraid to express myself in this manner, especially in the face of 
such a formidable array of ability as is now drawn up before me, 
composed of the ancient household troops of that side of the House and 
the new recruits from this, if the matter were not clear and indisputable. 
Nothing but truth could give me this firmness; but plain truth and clear 
evidence can be beat down by no ability. The clerk will be so good as 
to turn to the act, and to read this favorite preamble. 
"Whereas it is expedient that a revenue should be raised in your 
Majesty's dominions in America, for making a more certain and 
adequate provision for defraying the charge of the administration of 
justice and support of civil government in such provinces where it shall 
be found necessary, and towards further defraying the expenses of 
_defending, protecting, and securing the said dominions_." 
You have heard this pompous performance. Now where is the revenue 
which is to do all these mighty things? Five sixths 
repealed,--abandoned,--sunk,--gone,--lost forever. Does the poor 
solitary tea-duty support the purposes of this preamble? Is not the 
supply there stated as effectually abandoned as if the tea-duty had 
perished in the general wreck? Here, Mr. Speaker, is a precious 
mockery:--a preamble without an act,--taxes granted in order to be 
repealed,--and the reasons of the grant still carefully kept up! This is 
raising a revenue in America! This is preserving dignity in England! If 
you repeal this tax, in compliance with the motion, I readily admit that 
you lose this fair preamble. Estimate your loss in it. The object of the 
act is gone already; and all you suffer is the purging the statute-book of 
the opprobrium of an empty, absurd, and false recital.
It has been said again and again, that the five taxes were repealed on 
commercial principles. It is so said in the paper in my hand:[3] a paper 
which I constantly carry about; which I have often used, and shall often 
use again. What is got by this paltry pretence of commercial principles 
I know not; for, if your government in America is destroyed by the 
repeal of taxes, it is of no consequence upon what ideas the repeal is 
grounded. Repeal this tax, too, upon commercial principles, if you 
please. These principles will serve as well now as they did formerly. 
But you know that either your objection to a repeal from these 
supposed consequences has no validity, or that this pretence never 
could remove it. This commercial motive never was believed by any 
man, either in America, which this letter is meant to soothe, or in 
England, which it is meant to deceive. It was impossible it should: 
because every man, in the least acquainted with the detail of commerce, 
must know that several of the articles on which the tax was repealed 
were fitter objects of duties than almost any other articles that could 
possibly be chosen,--without comparison more so than the tea that was 
left taxed, as infinitely less liable to be eluded by contraband. The tax 
upon red and white lead was of this nature. You have in this kingdom 
an advantage in lead that amounts to a monopoly. When you find 
yourself in this situation of advantage, you sometimes venture to tax 
even your own export. You did so soon after the last war, when, upon 
this principle, you ventured to impose a duty on coals. In all the articles 
of American contraband trade, who ever heard of the smuggling of red 
lead and white lead? You might, therefore, well enough, without danger 
of contraband, and without injury to commerce, (if this were    
    
		
	
	
	Continue reading on your phone by scaning this QR Code
	 	
	
	
	    Tip: The current page has been bookmarked automatically. If you wish to continue reading later, just open the 
Dertz Homepage, and click on the 'continue reading' link at the bottom of the page.