be paying her own way, 
and be making full personal and financial contributions to the State. It 
is in connexion with this fictitious woman that Mill sets himself to 
work out the benefits which women would derive from co-partnership 
with men in the government of the State, and those which such 
co-partnership would confer on the community. Finally, practising 
again upon himself the same imposition as in his Political Economy, 
this unpractical trafficker in abstractions sets out to persuade his reader 
that he has, by dealing with fictions of the mind, effectively grappled 
with the concrete problem of woman's suffrage.
This, then, is the philosopher who gives intellectual prestige to the 
Woman's Suffrage cause. 
But is there not, let us in the end ask ourselves, here and there at least, a 
man who is of real account in the world of affairs, and who is--not 
simply a luke-warm Platonic friend or an opportunist advocate--but an 
impassioned promoter of the woman's suffrage movement? One knows 
quite well that there is. But then one suspects --one perhaps discerns by 
"the spirit sense"--that this impassioned promoter of woman's suffrage 
is, on the sequestered side of his life, an idealistic dreamer: one for 
whom some woman's memory has become, like Beatrice for Dante, a 
mystic religion. 
We may now pass on to deal with the arguments by which the woman 
suffragist has sought to establish her case. 
 
PART I 
ARGUMENTS WHICH ARE ADDUCED IN SUPPORT OF 
WOMAN'S SUFFRAGE 
I 
ARGUMENTS FROM ELEMENTARY NATURAL RIGHTS 
Signification of the Term "Woman's Rights"--Argument from "Justice" 
--Juridical Justice-"Egalitarian Equity"--Argument from Justice 
Applied to Taxation--Argument from Liberty--Summary of Arguments 
from Elementary Natural Rights. 
Let us note that the suffragist does not--except, perhaps, when she is 
addressing herself to unfledged girls and to the sexually 
embittered--really produce much effect by inveighing against the legal 
grievances of woman under the bastardy laws, the divorce laws, and the 
law which fixes the legal age of consent. This kind of appeal does not 
go down with the ordinary man and woman--first, because there are
many who think that in spite of occasional hardships the public 
advantage is, on the whole, very well served by the existing laws; 
secondly, because any alterations which might be desirable could very 
easily be made without recourse to woman's suffrage; and thirdly, 
because the suffragist consistently acts on the principle of bringing up 
against man everything that can possibly be brought up against him, 
and of never allowing anything to appear on the credit side of the 
ledger. 
The arguments which the woman suffragist really places confidence in 
are those which are provided by undefined general principles, 
apothegms set out in the form of axioms, formulae which are vehicles 
for fallacies, ambiguous abstract terms, and "question-begging" epithets. 
Your ordinary unsophisticated man and woman stand almost helpless 
against arguments of this kind. 
For these bring to bear moral pressure upon human nature. And when 
the intellect is confused by a word or formula which conveys an ethical 
appeal, one may very easily find oneself committed to action which 
one's unbiased reason would never have approved. The very first 
requirement in connexion with any word or phrase which conveys a 
moral exhortation is, therefore, to analyse it and find out its true 
signification. For all such concepts as justice, rights, freedom, 
chivalry--and it is with these that we shall be specially concerned--are, 
when properly defined and understood beacon-lights, but when ill 
understood and undefined, stumbling-blocks in the path of humanity. 
We may appropriately begin by analysing the term "Woman's Rights" 
and the correlative formula "Woman has a right to the suffrage." 
Our attention here immediately focuses upon the term right. It is one of 
the most important of the verbal agents by which the suffragist hopes to 
bring moral pressure to bear upon man. 
Now, the term right denotes in its juridical sense a debt which is owed 
to us by the State. A right is created when the community binds itself to 
us, its individual members, to intervene by force to restrain any one 
from interfering with us, and to protect us in the enjoyment of our
faculties, privileges, and property. 
The term is capable of being given a wider meaning. While no one 
could appropriately speak of our having a right to health or anything 
that man has not the power to bestow, it is arguable that there are, 
independent of and antecedent to law, elementary rights: a right to 
freedom; a right to protection against personal violence; a right to the 
protection of our property; and a right to the impartial administration of 
regulations which are binding upon all. Such a use of the term right 
could be justified on the ground that everybody would be willing to 
make personal sacrifices, and to combine with his fellows for the    
    
		
	
	
	Continue reading on your phone by scaning this QR Code
 
	 	
	
	
	    Tip: The current page has been bookmarked automatically. If you wish to continue reading later, just open the 
Dertz Homepage, and click on the 'continue reading' link at the bottom of the page.
	    
	    
