time, 
charmed stress upon the fact that he spoke with an "English accent." 
His enunciation was in fact clear cut and treated its vowels well. He 
was a man who observed with an air of accustomed punctiliousness 
such social rules and courtesies as he deemed it expedient to consider. 
An astute worldling had remarked that he was at once more 
ceremonious and more casual in his manner than men bred in America. 
"If you invite him to dinner," the wording said, "or if you die, or marry, 
or meet with an accident, his notes of condolence or congratulation are 
prompt and civil, but the actual truth is that he cares nothing whatever 
about you or your relations, and if you don't please him he does not 
hesitate to sulk or be astonishingly rude, which last an American does 
not allow himself to be, as a rule." 
By many people Sir Nigel was not analysed, but accepted. He was of 
the early English who came to New York, and was a novelty of interest,
with his background of Manor House and village and old family name. 
He was very much talked of at vivacious ladies' luncheon parties, he 
was very much talked to at equally vivacious afternoon teas. At dinner 
parties he was furtively watched a good deal, but after dinner when he 
sat with the men over their wine, he was not popular. He was not 
perhaps exactly disliked, but men whose chief interest at that period lay 
in stocks and railroads, did not find conversation easy with a man 
whose sole occupation had been the shooting of birds and the hunting 
of foxes, when he was not absolutely loitering about London, with his 
time on his hands. The stories he told--and they were few--were chiefly 
anecdotes whose points gained their humour by the fact that a man was 
a comically bad shot or bad rider and either peppered a gamekeeper or 
was thrown into a ditch when his horse went over a hedge, and such 
relations did not increase in the poignancy of their interest by being 
filtered through brains accustomed to applying their powers to 
problems of speculation and commerce. He was not so dull but that he 
perceived this at an early stage of his visit to New York, which was 
probably the reason of the infrequency of his stories. 
He on his side was naturally not quick to rise to the humour of a "big 
deal" or a big blunder made on Wall Street--or to the wit of jokes 
concerning them. Upon the whole he would have been glad to have 
understood such matters more clearly. His circumstances were such as 
had at last forced him to contemplate the world of money-makers with 
something of an annoyed respect. "These fellows" who had neither 
titles nor estates to keep up could make money. He, as he 
acknowledged disgustedly to himself, was much worse than a beggar. 
There was Stornham Court in a state of ruin-- the estate going to the 
dogs, the farmhouses tumbling to pieces and he, so to speak, without a 
sixpence to bless himself with, and head over heels in debt. Englishmen 
of the rank which in bygone times had not associated itself with trade 
had begun at least to trifle with it--to consider its potentialities as 
factors possibly to be made useful by the aristocracy. Countesses had 
not yet spiritedly opened milliners' shops, nor belted Earls adorned the 
stage, but certain noblemen had dallied with beer and coquetted with 
stocks. One of the first commercial developments had been the 
discovery of America--particularly of New York--as a place where if
one could make up one's mind to the plunge, one might marry one's 
sons profitably. At the outset it presented a field so promising as to lead 
to rashness and indiscretion on the part of persons not given to analysis 
of character and in consequence relying too serenely upon an 
ingenuousness which rather speedily revealed that it had its limits. 
Ingenuousness combining itself with remarkable alertness of perception 
on occasion, is rather American than English, and is, therefore, to the 
English mind, misleading. 
At first younger sons, who "gave trouble" to their families, were sent 
out. Their names, their backgrounds of castles or manors, relatives of 
distinction, London seasons, fox hunting, Buckingham Palace and 
Goodwood Races, formed a picturesque allurement. That the castles 
and manors would belong to their elder brothers, that the relatives of 
distinction did not encourage intimacy with swarms of the younger 
branches of their families; that London seasons, hunting, and racing 
were for their elders and betters, were facts not realised in all their 
importance by the republican mind. In the course of time they were 
realised to the full, but in Rosalie Vanderpoel's nineteenth year they 
covered what was at that    
    
		
	
	
	Continue reading on your phone by scaning this QR Code
	 	
	
	
	    Tip: The current page has been bookmarked automatically. If you wish to continue reading later, just open the 
Dertz Homepage, and click on the 'continue reading' link at the bottom of the page.