of Jerusalem that their city should remain 
forever if they would hallow the Sabbath day. Now suppose the 
inhabitants of Jerusalem had entered into this agreement, and entailed it 
upon their posterity (because you see it could not have been fulfilled 
unless it had continued from generation to generation,) to keep the 
Sabbath holy, would not God have been bound to let Jerusalem remain 
forever? You say [9]yes. Well, then, I ask you to shew how he could 
have kept that promise inviolate if he intended in less than six hundred 
and fifty years to change this seventh day Sabbath, and call the first day 
of the week the Sabbath, or abolish it altogether? I say, therefore, if 
there has been any change one way or the other in the Sabbath, since 
that promise, it would be impossible to understand any other promise in 
the Bible; how much more reasonable to believe God than man. If men 
will allow themselves to believe the monstrous absurdity that 
FOREVER, as in this promise, ended at the resurrection, then they can 
easily believe that the Sabbath was changed from the seventh to the 
first day of the week. Or if they choose the other extreme, abolished
until the people of God should awake to be clothed on with immortality. 
Heb. iv: 9. 
Now does it not appear plain that the Sabbath is from God, and that it is 
coeval and co-extensive (as is the institution of marriage) with the 
world. That it is without limitation; that there is not one thus saith the 
Lord that it ever was or ever will be abolished, in time or eternity.--See 
Exod. xxxi: 16, 17; and Isa. lxvi: 22, 24; Heb. iv: 4, 9. But let us return 
and look at the subject as we have commenced in the light of Paul's 
argument to the Romans and Collossians, for here is where all writers 
on this subject, for the change or the overthrow of the seventh day 
Sabbath attempt to draw their strong arguments. The second question 
then, is this: 
HAS THE SABBATH BEEN ABOLISHED SINCE THE SEVENTH 
DAY OF CREATION? IF SO, WHEN, AND WHERE IS THE 
PROOF? 
The text already referred to, is in Rom. xiv: 5, 6.--"One man esteemeth 
one day above another; another esteemeth every day alike. Let every 
man be persuaded in his own mind. He that regardeth the day, 
regardeth it unto the Lord; and he that regardeth not the day to the Lord, 
he doth not regard it." Does the apostle here mean to say, that under the 
new or Christian dispensation it is a matter of indifference which day of 
the week is kept as a Sabbath, or whether any Sabbath at all is kept? 
Was that institution which the people of God had been commanded to 
call a delight, the holy of the Lord, honorable, now to be esteemed of 
so carnal a nature as to be ranked among [10]the things which Jesus 
"took out of the way, nailing it to his cross." If this be true, then has 
Jesus, in the same manner, abolished the eight last verses in the 
fifty-eighth of Isaiah, and the 2d, 6th and 7th verses of the 56th chapter 
have no reference to the Gentile since the crucifixion. O Lord help us 
rightly to understand and divide thy word. But is it not evident from the 
four first verses in the same chapter of Romans, that Paul is speaking of 
feast days; giving them again in substance the decrees which had been 
given by the Apostles in their first conference, in A. D. 51, held at 
Jerusalem. See Acts xv: 19. James proposes their letter to the Gentiles
should be "that they abstain from pollution of Idols, and from 
fornication, and from things strangled, and from blood;" to which the 
conference all agreed. Now please read their unanimous decrees (xvi: 
4,) from twenty-three to thirty verses. "For it seemed good to the Holy 
Ghost and to us, to lay upon you no greater burden than these necessary 
things." "That ye abstain from meats offered to Idols, and from blood, 
and from things strangled, and from fornication, from which if ye keep 
yourselves ye shall do well." Reading along to the 13th of the next 
chapter, we find Paul establishing the Churches with these decrees; (see 
4, 5,) and at Philippi he holds his meeting, (not in the Jews Synagogue) 
but at the river's side, on the Sabbath day. A little from this it is said 
that Paul is in Thesalonica preaching on the Sabbath days. Luke says 
this was his manner! What was it? Why, to preach on the Sabbath days, 
(not 1st days.) Observe here was three Sabbaths in succession. xvii: 2. 
A little while from this Paul locates himself in Corinth, and    
    
		
	
	
	Continue reading on your phone by scaning this QR Code
	 	
	
	
	    Tip: The current page has been bookmarked automatically. If you wish to continue reading later, just open the 
Dertz Homepage, and click on the 'continue reading' link at the bottom of the page.