dinde 
aux truffes, we know you would have at us, in a tone of great moral 
indignation, and wish to know why we sneaked into great houses, 
eating good suppers, and drinking choice wines, and then went away 
with an indigestion, to write dyspeptic disgusts at society. 
We might reply that it is necessary to know something of a subject 
before writing about it, and that if a man wished to describe the habits 
of South Sea Islanders, it is useless to go to Greenland; we might also 
confess a partiality for _paté_, and a tenderness for truffes, and 
acknowledge that, considering our single absence would not put down 
extravagant, pompous parties, we were not strong enough to let the 
morsels drop into unappreciating mouths; or we might say, that if a 
man invited us to see his new house, it would not be ungracious nor 
insulting to his hospitality, to point out whatever weak parts we might 
detect in it, nor to declare our candid conviction, that it was built upon 
wrong principles and could not stand. He might believe us if we had
been in the house, but he certainly would not, if we had never seen it. 
Nor would it be a very wise reply upon his part, that we might build a 
better if we didn't like that. We are not fond of David's pictures, but we 
certainly could never paint half so well; nor of Pope's poetry, but 
posterity will never hear of our verses. Criticism is not construction, it 
is observation. If we could surpass in its own way every thing which 
displeased us, we should make short work of it, and instead of showing 
what fatal blemishes deform our present society, we should present a 
specimen of perfection, directly. 
[Illustration] 
We went to the brilliant ball. There was too much of everything. Too 
much light, and eating, and drinking, and dancing, and flirting, and 
dressing, and feigning, and smirking, and much too many people. Good 
taste insists first upon fitness. But why had Mrs. Potiphar given this 
ball? We inquired industriously, and learned it was because she did not 
give one last year. Is it then essential to do this thing biennially? 
inquired we with some trepidation. "Certainly," was the bland reply, 
"or society will forget you." Everybody was unhappy at Mrs. Potiphar's, 
save a few girls and boys, who danced violently all the evening. Those 
who did not dance walked up and down the rooms as well as they could, 
squeezing by non-dancing ladies, causing them to swear in their hearts 
as the brusque broadcloth carried away the light outworks of gauze and 
gossamer. The dowagers, ranged in solid phalanx, occupied all the 
chairs and sofas against the wall, and fanned themselves until 
supper-time, looking at each other's diamonds, and criticising the 
toilettes of the younger ladies, each narrowly watching her peculiar 
Polly Jane, that she did not betray too much interest in any man who 
was not of a certain fortune. It is the cold, vulgar truth, madam, nor are 
we in the slightest degree exaggerating. Elderly gentlemen, twisting 
single gloves in a very wretched manner, came up and bowed to the 
dowagers, and smirked, and said it was a pleasant party, and a 
handsome house, and then clutched their hands behind them, and 
walked miserably away, looking as affable as possible. And the 
dowagers made a little fun of the elderly gentlemen, among themselves, 
as they walked away. 
Then came the younger non-dancing men--a class of the community 
who wear black cravats and waistcoats, and thrust their thumbs and
forefingers in their waistcoat pockets, and are called "talking men." 
Some of them are literary, and affect the philosopher; have, perhaps, 
written a book or two, and are a small species of lion to very young 
ladies. Some are of the _blasé_ kind; men who affect the extremest 
elegance, and are reputed "so aristocratic," and who care for nothing in 
particular, but wish they had not been born gentlemen, in which case 
they might have escaped ennui. These gentlemen stand with hat in hand, 
and coats and trowsers most unexceptionable. They are the "so 
gentlemanly" persons of whom one hears a great deal, but which seems 
to mean nothing but cleanliness. Vivian Grey and Pelham are the 
models of their ambition, and they succeed in being Pendennis. They 
enjoy the reputation of being "very clever," and "very talented fellows," 
"smart chaps," etc., but they refrain from proving what is so generously 
conceded. They are often men of a certain cultivation. They have 
travelled, many of them,--spending a year or two in Paris, and a month 
or two in the rest of Europe. Consequently they endure society at home, 
with a smile, and a shrug, and a graceful superciliousness, which is 
very engaging. They    
    
		
	
	
	Continue reading on your phone by scaning this QR Code
 
	 	
	
	
	    Tip: The current page has been bookmarked automatically. If you wish to continue reading later, just open the 
Dertz Homepage, and click on the 'continue reading' link at the bottom of the page.
	    
	    
