were all æsthetic, almost technical ones, 
such as a theory, indicated by his preference for the line of Poe, that the 
letter "v" was the most beautiful of the letters, and could never be 
brought into verse too often. For any more abstract theories he had 
neither tolerance nor need. Poetry as a philosophy did not exist for him; 
it existed solely as the loveliest of the arts. He loved the elegance of 
Horace, all that was most complex in the simplicity of Poe, most 
birdlike in the human melodies of Verlaine. He had the pure lyric gift, 
unweighted or unballasted by any other quality of mind or emotion; 
and a song, for him, was music first, and then whatever you please 
afterwards, so long as it suggested, never told, some delicate sentiment, 
a sigh or a caress; finding words, at times, as perfect as the words of a 
poem headed, "O Mors! quam amara est memoria tua homini pacem 
habenti in substantiis suis." 
There, surely, the music of silence speaks, if it has ever spoken. The 
words seem to tremble back into the silence which their whisper has 
interrupted, but not before they have created for us a mood, such a 
mood as the Venetian Pastoral of Giorgione renders in painting. 
Languid, half inarticulate, coming from the heart of a drowsy sorrow 
very conscious of itself, and not less sorrowful because it sees its own 
face looking mournfully back out of the water, the song seems to have 
been made by some fastidious amateur of grief, and it has all the sighs 
and tremors of the mood, wrought into a faultless strain of music. 
Stepping out of a paradise in which pain becomes so lovely, he can see 
the beauty which is the other side of madness, and, in a sonnet, "To 
One in Bedlam," can create a more positive, a more poignant mood, 
with fine subtlety. 
Here, in the moment's intensity of this comradeship with madness, 
observe how beautiful the whole thing becomes; how instinctively the 
imagination of the poet turns what is sordid into a radiance, all stars 
and flowers and the divine part of forgetfulness! It is a symbol of the 
two sides of his own life: the side open to the street, and the side turned 
away from it, where he could "hush and bless himself with silence." No 
one ever worshipped beauty more devoutly, and just as we see him here 
transfiguring a dreadful thing with beauty, so we shall see, everywhere
in his work, that he never admitted an emotion which he could not so 
transfigure. He knew his limits only too well; he knew that the deeper 
and graver things of life were for the most part outside the circle of his 
magic; he passed them by, leaving much of himself unexpressed, 
because he would not permit himself to express nothing imperfectly, or 
according to anything but his own conception of the dignity of poetry. 
In the lyric in which he has epitomised himself and his whole life, a 
lyric which is certainly one of the greatest lyrical poems of our time, 
"Non sum qualis eram bonae sub regno Cynarae," he has for once said 
everything, and he has said it to an intoxicating and perhaps immortal 
music. 
Here, perpetuated by some unique energy of a temperament rarely so 
much the master of itself, is the song of passion and the passions, at 
their eternal war in the soul which they quicken or deaden, and in the 
body which they break down between them. In the second book, the 
book of "Decorations," there are a few pieces which repeat, only more 
faintly, this very personal note. Dowson could never have developed; 
he had already said, in his first book of verse, all that he had to say. 
Had he lived, had he gone on writing, he could only have echoed 
himself; and probably it would have been the less essential part of 
himself; his obligation to Swinburne, always evident, increasing as his 
own inspiration failed him. He was always without ambition, writing to 
please his own fastidious taste, with a kind of proud humility in his 
attitude towards the public, not expecting or requiring recognition. He 
died obscure, having ceased to care even for the delightful labour of 
writing. He died young, worn out by what was never really life to him, 
leaving a little verse which has the pathos of things too young and too 
frail ever to grow old. 
ARTHUR SYMONS.
1900. 
THE POEMS OF ERNEST DOWSON 
TO MISSIE (A. P.) 
IN PREFACE: FOR ADELAIDE
To you, who are my verses, as on some very future day, if you ever 
care to read them, you will understand, would it not be somewhat 
trivial to dedicate any one verse, as I may do, in    
    
		
	
	
	Continue reading on your phone by scaning this QR Code
	 	
	
	
	    Tip: The current page has been bookmarked automatically. If you wish to continue reading later, just open the 
Dertz Homepage, and click on the 'continue reading' link at the bottom of the page.