medium for--as well as a subject of--their inscriptions. 
The Merry-Thought, then, is not even the kind of art that Dryden 
attacked in MacFlecknoe and Pope in his Dunciad--the work of bad
poets masquerading as geniuses.[1] Rather, it is a primitive form of 
folk art produced as a more or less spontaneous act of play or passion, 
and achieving some small degree of respectability only when practiced 
by a respected poet and collected with his more serious verse.[2] Like 
modern "serial" graffiti, it could function as a form of communication 
since the first inscriptions often provoked those who followed to make 
their own contributions. 
[Footnote 1: On the other hand, the willingness of publishers to bring 
out such material would have suited well enough with Pope's picture of 
heir heroic games. See Alexander Pope, The Dunciad, ed. James 
utherland, Twickenham Edition, 2d ed., rev. (London: Methuen, 1953), 
97-306, bk 2, lines 17-220.] 
[Footnote 2: See, for example, W. H. Auden's "Academic Graffiti," in 
Collected Poems, ed. Edward Mendelsohn (London: Faber and Faber, 
976), 510-18. Such a verse as the following is more clever than most 
raffiti, but like ordinary graffiti it remains essentially "unpoetic": Lord 
Byron / Once succumbed to a Siren. / His flesh was weak, / Hers 
reek."] 
Indeed, one of the more interesting aspects of graffiti is that in an 
impermanent form it testifies to the continuance over the centuries of 
certain human concerns. Recent studies of graffiti have often focused 
on particular modern conflicts between races or nations, on drug 
problems, and on specific political commentary.[3] But such local 
matters aside, the content of modern graffiti is surprisingly like that of 
earlier periods: scatological observations, laments of lovers, 
accusations against women for their sexual promiscuity, the repetition 
of "trite" poems and sayings, and messages attributed to various men 
and women suggesting their sexual availability and proficiency. And if 
the political targets have changed over the years, many of the political 
attitudes have remained consistent. Graffiti is an irreverent form, with 
strong popular and anti-establishment elements. As actions common to 
all classes, eating, drinking, defecation, and fornication find their lowly 
record in graffiti-like form. 
[Footnote 3: See, for example, Elizabeth Wales and Barbara Brewer,
"Graffiti in the 1970's," Journal of Social Psychology 99 (1976): 
115-23.] 
On the most basic level, a writer will observe that the excrement of the 
rich differs in no way from that of the poor. Thus one poem, taken 
supposedly from a "Person of Quality's Boghouse," has the following 
sentiment: 
Good Lord! who could think, That such fine Folks should stink? (Pt. 2, 
p. 25) 
There is nothing very polite about such observations, and no pretension 
to art. These verses belong strictly to folklore and the sociology of 
literature, but they suggest some continuing rumbles of discontent 
against the class system, the existence among the lower orders of some 
of the egalitarian attitudes that survived the passing of the Lollards and 
the Levellers. Who were the writers of these pieces? Were they indeed 
laborers? Or were they from the lower part of what was called the 
"middle orders"? Is there some evidence to be found in the very fact 
that they could write? 
Graffiti may, indeed, tell us something about degrees of literacy. One 
wit remarked that whatever the ability to read or write may have been 
at the time, almost everyone seemed to have been literate when 
presented with a bog-house wall: "Since all who come to Bog-house 
write" (pt. 2, p. 26). The traditional connection between defecation and 
writing was another comparison apparent to the commentators. One 
wrote: 
There's Nothing foul that we commit, But what we write, and what we 
sh - - t. (Pt. 2, p. 13) 
And the lack of some paper or material to clean the rear end provoked 
the following sentiment in the form of a litany: 
From costive Stools, and hide-bound Wit, From Bawdy Rhymes, and 
Hole besh - - t. From Walls besmear'd with stinking Ordure, By Swine 
who nee'r provide Bumfodder Libera Nos---- (Pt. 4, p. 7)
Other types of graffiti, however, vary from the very earnest expression 
of affection to the nonexcrementally satiric. One of the more unusual is 
a poem in praise of a faithful and loving wife: 
I kiss'd her standing, Kiss'd her lying, Kiss'd her in Health, And kiss'd 
her dying; And when she mounts the Skies, I'll kiss her flying. (Pt. 3, p. 
5) 
Underneath this poem, The Merry-Thought records a favorable 
comment on the sentiment. Even more earnest is the complaint of a 
woman about her fate in love: 
Since cruel Fate has robb'd me of the Youth, For whom my Heart had 
hoarded all its Truth, I'll ne'er love more, dispairing e'er to find, Such 
Constancy and Truth amongst Mankind. Feb. 18, 1725. (Pt. 2, p. 12) 
We will never    
    
		
	
	
	Continue reading on your phone by scaning this QR Code
 
	 	
	
	
	    Tip: The current page has been bookmarked automatically. If you wish to continue reading later, just open the 
Dertz Homepage, and click on the 'continue reading' link at the bottom of the page.
	    
	    
