The Making of Religion

The Making of Religion

The Project Gutenberg EBook of The Making of Religion, by Andrew Lang This eBook
is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with almost no restrictions whatsoever.
You may copy it, give it away or re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg
License included with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.net
Title: The Making of Religion
Author: Andrew Lang
Release Date: May 14, 2004 [EBook #12353]
Language: English
Character set encoding: ISO-8859-1
*** START OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK THE MAKING OF
RELIGION ***

Produced by Robert Connal, William A. Pifer-Foote and PG Distributed Proofreaders.
This file was produced from images generously made available by gallica (Bibliothèque
nationale de France) at http://gallica.bnf.fr.

THE MAKING OF RELIGION
BY ANDREW LANG
M.A., LL.D. ST ANDREWS
HONORARY FELLOW OF MERTON COLLEGE OXFORD SOMETIME GIFFORD
LECTURER IN THE UNIVERSITY OF ST ANDREWS
SECOND EDITION 1900

_TO THE PRINCIPAL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ST. ANDREWS
DEAR PRINCIPAL DONALDSON,
I hope you will permit me to lay at the feet of the University of St. Andrews, in
acknowledgment of her life-long kindnesses to her old pupil, these chapters on the early
History of Religion. They may be taken as representing the Gifford Lectures delivered by
me, though in fact they contain very little that was spoken from Lord Gifford's chair. I
wish they were more worthy of an Alma Mater which fostered in the past the leaders of
forlorn hopes that were destined to triumph; and the friends of lost causes who fought
bravely against Fate--Patrick Hamilton, Cargill, and Argyll, Beaton and Montrose, and
Dundee.
Believe me
Very sincerely yours,

ANDREW LANG_.
* * * * *
PREFACE TO THE NEW EDITION
By the nature of things this book falls under two divisions. The first eight chapters
criticise the current anthropological theory of the origins of the belief in _spirits._
Chapters
ix.-xvii., again, criticise the current anthropological theory as to how, the notion of spirit
once attained, man arrived at the idea of a Supreme Being. These two branches of the
topic are treated in most modern works concerned with the Origins of Religion, such as
Mr. Tyler's "Primitive Culture," Mr. Herbert Spencer's "Principles of Sociology," Mr.
Jevons's "Introduction to the History of Religion," the late Mr. Grant Allen's "Evolution
of the Idea of God," and many others. Yet I have been censured for combining, in this
work, the two branches of my subject; and the second part has been regarded as but
faintly connected with the first.
The reason for this criticism seems to be, that while one small set of students is interested
in, and familiar with the themes examined in the first part (namely the psychological
characteristics of certain mental states from which, in part, the doctrine of spirits is said
to have arisen), that set of students neither knows nor cares anything about the matter
handled in the second part. This group of students is busied with "Psychical Research,"
and the obscure human faculties implied in alleged cases of hallucination, telepathy,
"double personality," human automatism, clairvoyance, and so on. Meanwhile
anthropological readers are equally indifferent as to that branch of psychology which
examines the conditions of hysteria, hypnotic trance, "double personality," and the like.
Anthropologists have not hitherto applied to the savage mental conditions, out of which,
in part, the doctrine of "spirits" arose, the recent researches of French, German, and
English psychologists of the new school. As to whether these researches into abnormal
psychological conditions do, or do not, indicate the existence of a transcendental region
of human faculty, anthropologists appear to be unconcerned. The only English exception
known to me is Mr. Tylor, and his great work, "Primitive Culture," was written thirty
years ago, before the modern psychological studies of Professor William James, Dr.
Romaine Newbold, M. Richet, Dr. Janet, Professor Sidgwick, Mr. Myers, Mr. Gurney, Dr.
Parish, and many others had commenced.
Anthropologists have gone on discussing the trances, and visions, and so-called
"demoniacal possession" of savages, as if no new researches into similar facts in the
psychology of civilised mankind existed; or, if they existed, threw any glimmer of light
on the abnormal psychology of savages. I have, on the other hand, thought it desirable to
sketch out a study of savage psychology in the light of recent psychological research.
Thanks to this daring novelty, the book has been virtually taken as two books;
anthropologists have criticised the second part, and one or two Psychical Researchers
have criticised the first part; each school leaving one part severely alone. Such are the
natural results of a too restricted specialism.
Even to Psychical Researchers the earlier division is of scant interest, because witnesses
to successful abnormal or supernormal faculty in savages cannot be brought into court
and cross-examined.