of divine concern. 
That play of Hebbel's in which the dualism of all being is most 
conspicuously tragic is Agnes Bernauer. Agnes is the daughter of a 
barber and surgeon, and is so beautiful that she is commonly known as 
the angel of Augsburg. Albrecht, the son and sole heir of the reigning 
duke Ernst, comes to Augsburg, falls in love with her, and, in spite of
friendly warning, marries her; for she has loved him at first sight, too. 
As persons, they do what is right for them to do; their marriage has 
been performed by a priest of the church; and they feel that it has 
divine sanction. But Albrecht is not an ordinary person; he is the heir to 
the throne, and public exigencies require that the succession shall be 
guaranteed. This marriage, however, is illegal--a board of incorruptible 
judges so finds it; it causes sedition and threatens interminable strife. 
Duke Ernst is deliberate and patient in dealing with the unprecedented 
case. He waits until he can wait no longer. Albrecht will not give up 
Agnes, nor Agnes give up him; Ernst respects the sacrament of 
wedlock by which they are united, and only after two and a half years 
does he sign the warrant by which Agnes was duly condemned to death. 
Agnes dies in perfect innocence and constancy, a victim of social 
convention. But Albrecht, whose disregard of this convention was 
rebellion, and whose vengeance for his wife's death brings him to the 
point of parricide, is made to see, not merely because excommunication 
accompanies the ban of the empire on him as a rebel, but also because 
of the instructive words and actions of his father, that the social 
organization he has defied has itself a divine sanction, and that a prince, 
standing by common consent at the head of that organization, cannot 
with impunity undermine the basis of his sovereignty. Devotion to him 
is like loyalty to the national ensign. The ensign is nothing in itself, but 
it symbolizes the idea of the State; and the prince is also the 
representative of an idea, which he must continue to represent in its 
entirety, or he ceases to be the prince. This lesson Albrecht learns when, 
like Kleist's _Prince of Homburg_, he is made judge in his own case, 
and when he perceives at the cost of what personal sacrifice his father 
has done his duty. The State prevails over Albrecht as it prevails over 
Agnes, whose only fault was that she did not immure her beauty in a 
nunnery. 
The sanction of tradition and custom which Albrecht and Agnes could 
not break in Agnes Bernauer Hebbel most impressively demonstrated 
in Gyges and his Ring. Kandaules, King of Lydia, is a rash innovator in 
both public and private life. He despises rusty swords and 
uncomfortable crowns, he means to do away with silly prejudices, and, 
like Herod, regarding his wife as a precious possession only, he 
procures for his friend Gyges an opportunity to see her unveiled. But
she, an Indian princess, is, in Christine Hebbel's words, a convolution 
of veils; her veil is inseparable from herself; and the brutal violation of 
her modesty is a less forgivable crime than the taking of her life would 
be. The wearing of a veil may be a foolish custom; but use and want 
hallow even the trivial. Half of our law is based upon precedent, and we 
are protected at every turn by unwritten law, which is nothing else than 
precedent. Mankind needs to repose in the security of this protection. 
Woe to him, said Hebbel, who disturbs the sleep of the world! Changes 
must come, but rarely in the way of revolution. 
The tragedy of the Nibelungen Hebbel approached somewhat 
differently from the other subjects that he treated. He had his own 
conception of the tragic content of the matter, of course; but he found 
that the author of the _Nibelungenlied_, a dramatist from head to foot, 
has so clearly presented the tragic aspects of the story that the modern 
dramatist need only make himself the interpreter of the medieval epic 
poet. Herewith Hebbel's trilogy is at once distinguished from such other 
modern treatments of the subject as Geibel's Brunhild or Wagner's 
Nibelungen Ring. Geibel eliminated everything supernatural; Wagner 
made use chiefly of the Old Norse versions of the story; Hebbel, on the 
contrary, dramatized what he regarded as the significant content of the 
Middle High German poem, retaining its mythological, Christian, 
chivalrous, historical, and legendary elements. The mythological 
elements of the epic are indeed indistinct survivals of earlier ages. 
Hebbel leaned somewhat upon Norse myths in his reproduction of them, 
though it was part of his plan to preserve a certain indistinctness and 
mystery in these undramatic presuppositions. Similarly, he made more 
of the element of    
    
		
	
	
	Continue reading on your phone by scaning this QR Code
	 	
	
	
	    Tip: The current page has been bookmarked automatically. If you wish to continue reading later, just open the 
Dertz Homepage, and click on the 'continue reading' link at the bottom of the page.