imperative and peremptory. The doctors 
(and they were among the best in the land) said, "No more of this kind 
of work for years," and I had to accept their verdict, though I knew that
"for years" meant forever. 
My disappointment lasted longer than the acute attack; but, thanks to 
the cheerful spirit of my wife, by early summer of that year I was able 
to face the situation with courage that grew as strength increased. 
Fortunately we were well to do, and the loss of professional income 
was not a serious matter. We were not rich as wealth is counted 
nowadays; but we were more than comfortable for ourselves and our 
children, though I should never earn another dollar. This is not the 
common state of the physician, who gives more and gets less than most 
other men; it was simply a happy combination of circumstances. Polly 
was a small heiress when we married; I had some money from my 
maternal grandfather; our income was larger than our necessities, and 
our investments had been fortunate. Fate had set no wolf to howl at our 
door. 
In June we decided to take to the woods, or rather to the country, to see 
what it had in store for us. The more we thought of it, the better I liked 
the plan, and Polly was no less happy over it. We talked of it morning, 
noon, and night, and my half-smothered instinct grew by what it fed on. 
Countless schemes at length resolved themselves into a factory farm, 
which should be a source of pleasure as well as of income. It was of all 
sizes, shapes, industries, and limits of expenditure, as the hours passed 
and enthusiasm waxed or waned. I finally compromised on from two 
hundred to three hundred acres of land, with a total expenditure of not 
more than $60,000 for the building of my factory. It was to produce 
butter, eggs, pork, and apples, all of best quality, and they were to be 
sold at best prices. I discoursed at some length on farms and farmers to 
Polly, who slept through most of the harangue. She afterward said that 
she enjoyed it, but I never knew whether she referred to my lecture or 
to her nap. 
If farming be the art of elimination, I want it not. If the farmer and the 
farmer's family must, by the nature of the occupation, be deprived of 
reasonable leisure and luxury, if the conveniences and amenities must 
be shorn close, if comfort must be denied and life be reduced to the 
elemental necessities of food and shelter, I want it not. But I do not
believe that this is the case. The wealth of the world comes from the 
land, which produces all the direct and immediate essentials for the 
preservation of life and the protection of the race. When people cease to 
look to the land for support, they lose their independence and fall under 
the tyranny of circumstances beyond their control. They are no longer 
producers, but consumers; and their prosperity is contingent upon the 
prosperity and good will of other people who are more or less alien. 
Only when a considerable percentage of a nation is living close to the 
land can the highest type of independence and prosperity be enjoyed. 
This law applies to the mass and also to the individual. The farmer, 
who produces all the necessities and many of the luxuries, and whose 
products are in constant demand and never out of vogue, should be 
independent in mode of life and prosperous in his fortunes. If this is not 
the condition of the average farmer (and I am sorry to say it is not), the 
fault is to be found, not in the land, but in the man who tills it. 
Ninety-five per cent of those who engage in commercial and 
professional occupations fail of large success; more than fifty per cent 
fail utterly, and are doomed to miserable, dependent lives in the service 
of the more fortunate. That farmers do not fail nearly so often is due to 
the bounty of the land, the beneficence of Nature, and the 
ever-recurring seed-time and harvest, which even the most thoughtless 
cannot interrupt. 
The waking dream of my life had been to own and to work land; to 
own it free of debt, and to work it with the same intelligence that has 
made me successful in my profession. Brains always seemed to me as 
necessary to success in farming as in law, or in medicine, or in business. 
I always felt that mind should control events in agriculture as in 
commercial life; that listlessness, carelessness, lack of thrift and energy, 
and waste, were the factors most potent in keeping the farmer poor and 
unreasonably harassed by the obligations    
    
		
	
	
	Continue reading on your phone by scaning this QR Code
	 	
	
	
	    Tip: The current page has been bookmarked automatically. If you wish to continue reading later, just open the 
Dertz Homepage, and click on the 'continue reading' link at the bottom of the page.