The Evolution of Man Scientifically Disproved | Page 2

clear definition that will apply to each of the various theories that
are held. Theories differ vastly in the extent of their application, as held by their various
advocates, resulting in great confusion of terms:--
1. The atheists believe that there is no God. Hence, matter was not created, but was
eternal, or came by chance. Only a mere handful of the whole human race have ever yet
believed such an untenable doctrine. The existence of a Creator, is doubted or denied by
extreme atheistic evolutionists, who would dethrone God, "exalt the monkey, and
degrade man."
2. The first of modern scientific men to adopt the theory that all plants and animals,
including man, are developed from certain original simple germs, was Lamarck, a French
naturalist, in 1809. He conceded that God created matter,--nothing more. He believed in
spontaneous generation, which scientific investigation has utterly disproved.
3. Darwin goes a step further and concedes there may have been a Creator of matter, and
of one, or at most, a few germs, from which all vegetation and all animals came by
evolution,--all orders, classes, families, genera, species, and varieties. He differs from
Lamarck, by allowing the creation of one germ, possibly a few more. He says in his
"Origin of Species," "I believe that animals are descended from at most only four or five
progenitors; and plants from an equal or lesser number.... Analogy would lead me one
step further, namely, to the belief that all animals and plants are descended from one
prototype.... All the organic beings, which have ever lived on the earth, may be
descended from some one primordial form." Darwin, because of his great scholarship,
fairness, and candor, won for his theory more favor than it inherently deserves. Darwin
taught that, "The lower impulses of vegetable life pass, by insensible gradations, into the
instinct of animals and the higher intelligence of man," without purpose or design. None
of these three hypotheses can admit the creation of man.
4. Other evolutionists, believing in the evolution of both plants and animals, nevertheless
refuse to believe in the evolution of man--the most baneful application of the whole
theory. Even if there were convincing proof of the evolution of plants and animals from
one germ, there is no real proof of the evolution of man. To prove this is the chief
purpose of this book.
5. A fifth theory of evolution is held by many. It is called polyphyletic evolution, which
means that God created numerous stocks, or beginnings of both plant and animal life,
which were subject to change and growth, deterioration and development, according to
his plan and purpose. So much of evolution in this sense as can be proved, is in harmony
with the Bible account of the creation of plants, animals and man. The false theory of
evolution is called the monophyletic, which teaches that all species of plants and animals
including man, developed from one cell or germ which came by creation or spontaneous
generation. Evolution is used throughout this book in this latter sense, unless otherwise
indicated by the context. God does not create by evolution, for it can only develop what
already exists.
This book is divided into three parts: In Part One, material evolution, especially the
evolution of the human body, is disproved. In Part Two, the alleged proofs of evolution

are examined and refuted. In Part Three, the evolution of the soul is shown to be
impossible.
There are in all fifty numbered arguments, including answers to the arguments of
evolutionists.

PART ONE
THE EVOLUTION OF THE HUMAN BODY MATHEMATICALLY DISPROVED
Any scientific theory or hypothesis must be proved first possible, then probable, then
certain. To be a possible theory, it must be reconcilable with many facts; to be a probable
theory, it must be reconcilable with many more; to be a certain and proven theory, it must
be reconcilable with all the facts. Whenever it is irreconcilable with any fact, it should be
rejected, as it can not be a true theory. Every true theory passes through these three
stages,--possibility, probability, and certainty. A theory is not science, until it is certainly
true, and so becomes knowledge. The evolution of man from the brute is in the throes of
a desperate struggle to show that it may possibly be a true theory or hypothesis. Yet some
who are ready to admit that they are "scientists," claim evolution a proven theory.
If it can be shown possible for man to have descended or ascended from the lower
animals, it will require enormous additional evidence to show that such descent is
probable; and still much more to make it certain.
Every scientific theory, proposed as _possible_, is reconcilable with some facts.
Otherwise, it would not have been considered for a moment. Many false