him 
and some young striplings went so far as to talk of his dotage. The 
partisans of Simon Giguet then turned to Phileas Beauvisage, the 
mayor, and won him over the more easily to their side because, without 
having quarrelled with his father-in-law, he assumed an independence 
of him which had ended in coldness,--an independence that the sly old 
notary allowed him to maintain, seeing in it an excellent means of 
action on the town of Arcis. 
The mayor, questioned the evening before in the open street, declared
positively that he should cast his vote for the first-comer on the list of 
eligibles rather than give it to Charles Keller, for whom, however, he 
had a high esteem. 
"Arcis shall be no longer a rotten borough!" he said, "or I'll emigrate to 
Paris." 
Flatter the passions of the moment and you will always be a hero, even 
at Arcis-sur-Aube. 
"Monsieur le maire," said everybody, "gives noble proof of his 
firmness of character." 
Nothing progresses so rapidly as a legal revolt. That evening Madame 
Marion and her friends organized for the morrow a meeting of 
"independent electors" in the interests of Simon Giguet, the colonel's 
son. The morrow had now come and had turned the house topsy-turvy 
to receive the friends on whose independence the leaders of the 
movement counted. Simon Giguet, the native-born candidate of a little 
town jealously desirous to elect a son of its own, had, as we have seen, 
put to profit this desire; and yet, the whole prosperity and fortune of the 
Giguet family were the work of the Comte de Gondreville. But when it 
comes to an election, what are sentiments! 
This Scene is written for the information of countries so unfortunate as 
not to know the blessings of national representation, and which are, 
therefore, ignorant by what intestinal convulsions, what Brutus- like 
sacrifices, a little town gives birth to a deputy. Majestic but natural 
spectacle, which may, indeed, be compared with that of childbirth,--the 
same throes, the same impurities, the same lacerations, the same final 
triumph! 
It may be asked why an only son, whose fortune was sufficient, should 
be, like Simon Giguet, an ordinary barrister in a little country town 
where barristers are pretty nearly useless. A word about the candidate is 
therefore necessary. 
Colonel Giguet had had, between 1806 and 1813, by his wife who died 
in 1814, three children, the eldest of whom, Simon, alone survived. 
Until he became an only child, Simon was brought up as a youth to 
whom the exercise of a profession would be necessary. And about the 
time he became by the death of his brothers the family heir, the young 
man met with a serious disappointment. Madame Marion had counted 
much, for her nephew, on the inheritance of his grandfather the banker
of Hamburg. But when that old German died in 1826, he left his 
grandson Giguet a paltry two thousand francs a year. The worthy 
banker, endowed with great procreative powers, having soothed the 
worries of business by the pleasures of paternity, favored the families 
of eleven other children who surrounded him, and who made him 
believe, with some appearance of justice, that Simon Giguet was 
already a rich man. 
Besides all this, the colonel was bent on giving his son an independent 
position, and for this reason: the Giguets could not expect any 
government favors under the Restoration. Even if Simon had not been 
the son of an ardent Bonapartist, he belonged to a family whose 
members had justly incurred the animosity of the Cinq-Cygne family, 
owing to the part which Giguet, the colonel of gendarmerie, and the 
Marions, including Madame Marion, had taken as witnesses on the 
famous trial of the Messieurs de Simeuse, unjustly condemned in 1805 
for the abduction of the Comte de Gondreville, then senator, and 
formerly representative of the people, who had despoiled the Cinq- 
Cygne family of their property. [See "An Historical Mystery."] 
Grevin was not only one of the most important witnesses at that trial, 
but he was one of the chief promoters of the prosecution. That affair 
divides to this day the arrondissement of Arcis into two parties; one of 
which declares the innocence of the condemned; the other standing by 
the Comte de Gondreville and his adherents. Though, under the 
Restoration, the Comtesse de Cinq-Cygne used all the influence the 
return of the Bourbons gave her to arrange things as she wished in the 
department of the Aube, the Comte de Gondreville contrived to 
counterbalance this Cinq-Cygne royalty by the secret authority he 
wielded over the liberals of the town through the notary Grevin, 
Colonel Giguet, his son-in-law Keller (always elected deputy in spite of 
the Cinq-Cygnes), and also by the credit he maintained, as long as 
Louis XVIII. lived, in the counsels of the crown.    
    
		
	
	
	Continue reading on your phone by scaning this QR Code
	 	
	
	
	    Tip: The current page has been bookmarked automatically. If you wish to continue reading later, just open the 
Dertz Homepage, and click on the 'continue reading' link at the bottom of the page.