The Conquest of Bread

The Conquest of Bread, by Peter
Kropotkin

The Project Gutenberg EBook of The Conquest of Bread, by Peter
Kropotkin This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and
with almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away
or re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included
with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org
Title: The Conquest of Bread
Author: Peter Kropotkin
Release Date: November 9, 2007 [EBook #23428]
Language: English
Character set encoding: ISO-8859-1
*** START OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK THE
CONQUEST OF BREAD ***

Produced by Steven desJardins, Martin Pettit and the Online
Distributed Proofreading Team at http://www.pgdp.net

The Conquest of Bread
By PETER KROPOTKIN

Author of "Fields, Factories, and Workshops" "The Memoirs of a
Revolutionist," Etc.
[Illustration]
NEW YORK VANGUARD PRESS
MCMXXVI
PRINTED IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

THE MAN (1842-1921):
Prince Peter Alexeivitch Kropotkin, revolutionary and scientist, was
descended from the old Russian nobility, but decided, at the age of
thirty, to throw in his lot with the social rebels not only of his own
country, but of the entire world. He became the intellectual leader of
Anarchist-Communism; took part in the labor movement; wrote many
books and pamphlets; established Le Révolté in Geneva and Freedom
in London; contributed to the Encyclopedia Britannica; was twice
imprisoned because of his radical activities; and twice visited America.
After the Bolshevist revolution he returned to Russia, kept himself
apart from Soviet activities, and died true to his ideals.

THE BOOK:
The Conquest of Bread is a revolutionary idyl, a beautiful outline
sketch of a future society based on liberty, equality and fraternity. It is,
in Kropotkin's own words, "a study of the needs of humanity, and of
the economic means to satisfy them." Read in conjunction with the
same author's "Fields, Factories and Workshops," it meets all the
difficulties of the social inquirer who says: "The Anarchist ideal is
alluring, but how could you work it out?"

CONTENTS
CHAPTER PAGE
I. OUR RICHES 1
II. WELL-BEING FOR ALL 12
III. ANARCHIST COMMUNISM 23
IV. EXPROPRIATION 34
V. FOOD 47
VI. DWELLINGS 73
VII. CLOTHING 84
VIII. WAYS AND MEANS 87
IX. THE NEED FOR LUXURY 95
X. AGREEABLE WORK 110
XI. FREE AGREEMENT 119
XII. OBJECTIONS 134
XIII. THE COLLECTIVIST WAGES SYSTEM 152
XIV. CONSUMPTION AND PRODUCTION 168
XV. THE DIVISION OF LABOUR 176
XVI. THE DECENTRALIZATION OF INDUSTRY 180
XVII. AGRICULTURE 191
NOTES 213

PREFACE
One of the current objections to Communism, and Socialism altogether,
is that the idea is so old, and yet it has never been realized. Schemes of
ideal States haunted the thinkers of Ancient Greece; later on, the early
Christians joined in communist groups; centuries later, large
communist brotherhoods came into existence during the Reform
movement. Then, the same ideals were revived during the great English
and French Revolutions; and finally, quite lately, in 1848, a revolution,
inspired to a great extent with Socialist ideals, took place in France.
"And yet, you see," we are told, "how far away is still the realization of
your schemes. Don't you think that there is some fundamental error in
your understanding of human nature and its needs?"
At first sight this objection seems very serious. However, the moment
we consider human history more attentively, it loses its strength. We
see, first, that hundreds of millions of men have succeeded in
maintaining amongst themselves, in their village communities, for
many hundreds of years, one of the main elements of Socialism--the
common ownership of the chief instrument of production, the land, and
the apportionment of the same according to the labour capacities of the
different families; and we learn that if the communal possession of the
land has been destroyed in Western Europe, it was not from within, but
from without, by the governments which created a land monopoly in
favour of the nobility and the middle classes. We learn, moreover, that
the medieval cities succeeded in maintaining in their midst, for several
centuries in succession, a certain socialized organization of production
and trade; that these centuries were periods of a rapid intellectual,
industrial, and artistic progress; while the decay of these communal
institutions came mainly from the incapacity of men of combining the
village with the city, the peasant with the citizen, so as jointly to
oppose the growth of the military states, which destroyed the free
cities.
The history of mankind, thus understood, does not offer, then, an
argument against Communism. It appears, on the contrary, as a

succession of endeavours to realize some sort of communist
organization, endeavours which were crowned here and there with a
partial success of a certain duration; and all we are authorized to
conclude is, that mankind has not yet found the proper form for
combining, on communistic principles,