not do half so many things well; 
she was a better romp than any I ever saw in nature."[4] Part of the half 
she could not do well were tragedy roles, attested to by Thomas Davies, 
who comments on her performances as Ophelia in Hamlet and Zara in 
_The Mourning Bride_: "Of Mrs. Clive's Ophelia I shall only say, that I 
regret that the first comic actress in the world should so far mistake her 
talents as to attempt it." And on Zara, "for her own benefit, the comic 
Clive put on the royal robes of Zara: she found them too heavy, and, 
very wisely, never wore them afterwards."[5] Part of the half she could 
do well is noticed, once again, by Davies: particularly adroit and 
distinguished in chambermaid parts, Mrs. Clive 
excelled also in characters of caprice and affectation, from the 
high-bred Lady Fanciful to the vulgar Mrs. Heidelberg; in country girls, 
romps, hoydens and dowdies, superannuated beauties, viragos and 
humourists; she had an inimitable talent in ridiculing the extravagant 
action and impertinent consequence of an Opera-singer--of which she 
gave an excellent specimen in Lethe. Her mirth was so genuine that 
whether it was restrained to the arch sneer, and suppressed half-laugh, 
or extended to the downright honest burst of loud laughter, the 
audience was sure to accompany her [my punctuation].[6] 
Mrs. Clive's stature as a comic actress would, then, seemingly make her 
a prize for Rich or Fleetwood, but they did their best to thwart her 
career and happiness at their theaters. 
I suspect that their motivation in so doing was fear that her temper, her 
influence with other actors and her audiences, and her strong loyalty to 
her profession would hinder their legislated power to control absolutely 
London theaters, players, and audiences in 1743. Not much 
investigation is required to see Mrs. Clive at her clamoring best, at
various times head to head with Susannah Cibber, Peg Woffington, 
Woodward, Shuter, or Garrick. Her letters to Garrick show that as late 
as the sixties she was quite capable of vitriol when she felt that she or 
her friends were unjustly treated. Tate Wilkinson was surely correct in 
describing her as "a mixture of combustibles; she was passionate, cross, 
and vulgar," often simultaneously.[7] If this were the case in mere 
greenroom tiffs or casual correspondence, how the ire of "the Clive" 
must have been excited by the cartelists, who did their utmost to keep 
her out of joint and almost out of sight. 
In 1733, Fielding, who furthered Mrs. Clive's career by writing and 
editing parts of his plays for her and publicly praising her as a woman 
and as an actress, wrote the following encomium on her professional 
integrity in his "Epistle to Mrs. Clive," prefatory to _The Intriguing 
Chambermaid_: 
The part you have maintained in the present dispute between the 
players and the patentees, is so full of honour, that had it been in higher 
life, it would have given you the reputation of the greatest heroine of 
the age. You looked on the cases of Mr. Highmore and Mrs. Wilks with 
compassion, nor could any promises or views of interest sway you to 
desert them; nor have you scrupled any fatigue ... to support the cause 
of those whom you imagine injured and distressed; and for this you 
have been so far from endeavouring to exact an exorbitant reward from 
persons little able to afford it, that I have known you to offer to act for 
nothing, rather than the patentees should be injured by the dismission 
of the audience.[8] 
Fielding is, of course, referring to the 1733 dispute in which Mrs. Clive 
(and Macklin) among the principal players stayed with the ineffective 
proprietor of Drury Lane, John Highmore. Jealous that Highmore and 
not he gained control of Drury Lane after former shareholders either 
died or sold out, Theophilus Cibber demanded, among other things, 
that Highmore share profits with his players rather than pay fixed 
salaries. He then led the Drury Lane players in revolt in the autumn of 
1733 to the New Haymarket where they played without a license until 
March of the 1733-1734 season, at which time they returned to Drury 
Lane under the new management of Fleetwood. The actors at least 
partially won this battle, and although Highmore tried to have the 
vagrant act enforced, the players returned to Drury Lane unscathed.
With Highmore gone, a period of uneasy peace obtained. The players, 
however, were not to win so easily the next dispute, the one that took 
place after the passage of the licensing act.[9] 
Mrs. Clive's decision to stay with Highmore rather than defect was 
probably made because "two women--Mrs. Wilks, the widow of her 
[Kitty's] old theatrical idol, and Mrs. Booth--were in he direction of the 
theater.[10] But in light of Fielding's words    
    
		
	
	
	Continue reading on your phone by scaning this QR Code
	 	
	
	
	    Tip: The current page has been bookmarked automatically. If you wish to continue reading later, just open the 
Dertz Homepage, and click on the 'continue reading' link at the bottom of the page.