History, as 
worthy of notice--that Pompey died, as it were, within sight of that very 
temple which he had polluted. Let us not suppose that Paganism, or
Pagan nations, were therefore excluded from the concern and tender 
interest of Heaven. They also had their place allowed. And we may be 
sure that, amongst them, the Roman emperor, as the great accountant 
for the happiness of more men, and men more cultivated, than ever 
before were intrusted to the motions of a single will, had a special, 
singular, and mysterious relation to the secret counsels of Heaven. 
Even we, therefore, may lawfully attribute some sanctity to the Roman 
emperor. That the Romans did so with absolute sincerity is certain. The 
altars of the emperor had a twofold consecration; to violate them, was 
the double crime of treason and heresy, In his appearances of state and 
ceremony, the fire, the sacred fire epompeue was carried in ceremonial 
solemnity before him; and every other circumstance of divine worship 
attended the emperor in his lifetime. [Footnote: The fact is, that the 
emperor was more of a sacred and divine creature in his lifetime than 
after his death. His consecrated character as a living ruler was a truth; 
his canonization, a fiction of tenderness to his memory.] 
To this view of the imperial character and relations must be added one 
single circumstance, which in some measure altered the whole for the 
individual who happened to fill the office. The emperor de facto might 
be viewed under two aspects: there was the man, and there was the 
office. In his office he was immortal and sacred: but as a question 
might still be raised, by means of a mercenary army, as to the claims of 
the particular individual who at any time filled the office, the very 
sanctity and privilege of the character with which he was clothed might 
actually be turned against himself; and here it is, at this point, that the 
character of Roman emperor became truly and mysteriously awful. 
Gibbon has taken notice of the extraordinary situation of a subject in 
the Roman empire who should attempt to fly from the wrath of the 
crown. Such was the ubiquity of the emperor that this was absolutely 
hopeless. Except amongst pathless deserts or barbarous nomads, it was 
impossible to find even a transient sanctuary from the imperial pursuit. 
If he went down to the sea, there he met the emperor: if he took the 
wings of the morning, and fled to the uttermost parts of the earth, there 
also was the emperor or his lieutenants. But the same omnipresence of 
imperial anger and retribution which withered the hopes of the poor
humble prisoner, met and confounded the emperor himself, when 
hurled from his giddy elevation by some fortunate rival. All the 
kingdoms of the earth, to one in that situation, became but so many 
wards of the same infinite prison. Flight, if it were even successful for 
the moment, did but a little retard his inevitable doom. And so evident 
was this, that hardly in one instance did the fallen prince attempt to fly; 
but passively met the death which was inevitable, in the very spot 
where ruin had overtaken him. Neither was it possible even for a 
merciful conqueror to show mercy; for, in the presence of an army so 
mercenary and factious, his own safety was but too deeply involved in 
the extermination of rival pretenders to the crown. 
Such, amidst the sacred security and inviolability of the office, was the 
hazardous tenure of the individual. Nor did his dangers always arise 
from persons in the rank of competitors and rivals. Sometimes it 
menaced him in quarters which his eye had never penetrated, and from 
enemies too obscure to have reached his ear. By way of illustration we 
will cite a case from the life of the Emperor Commodus, which is wild 
enough to have furnished the plot of a romance--though as well 
authenticated as any other passage in that reign. The story is narrated 
by Herodian, and the circumstances are these: A slave of noble 
qualities, and of magnificent person, having liberated himself from the 
degradations of bondage, determined to avenge his own wrongs by 
inflicting continual terror upon the town and neighborhood which had 
witnessed his humiliation. For this purpose he resorted to the woody 
recesses of the province, (somewhere in the modern Transylvania,) and, 
attracting to his wild encampment as many fugitives as he could, by 
degrees he succeeded in forming and training a very formidable troop 
of freebooters. Partly from the energy of his own nature, and partly 
from the neglect and remissness of the provincial magistrates, the 
robber captain rose from less to more, until he had formed a little army, 
equal to the task of assaulting fortified cities.    
    
		
	
	
	Continue reading on your phone by scaning this QR Code
	 	
	
	
	    Tip: The current page has been bookmarked automatically. If you wish to continue reading later, just open the 
Dertz Homepage, and click on the 'continue reading' link at the bottom of the page.