but was at that time quite a young .man, and 
distinguished among the Miusovs as a man of enlightened ideas and of 
European culture, who had been in the capitals and abroad. Towards 
the end of his life he became a Liberal of the type common in the 
forties and fifties. In the course of his career he had come into contact 
with many of the most Liberal men of his epoch, both in Russia and 
abroad. He had known Proudhon and Bakunin personally, and in his 
declining years was very fond of describing the three days of the Paris 
Revolution of February, 1848, hinting that he himself had almost taken 
part in the fighting on the barricades. This was one of the most grateful 
recollections of his youth. He had an independent property of about a 
thousand souls, to reckon in the old style. His splendid estate lay on the 
outskirts of our little town and bordered on the lands of our famous 
monastery, with which Pyotr Alexandrovitch began an endless lawsuit, 
almost as soon as he came into the estate, concerning the rights of 
fishing in the river or wood-cutting in the forest, I don't know exactly
which. He regarded it as his duty as a citizen and a man of culture to 
open an attack upon the "clericals." Hearing all about Adelaida 
Ivanovna, whom he, of course, remembered, and in whom he had at 
one time been interested, and learning of the existence of Mitya, he 
intervened, in spite of all his youthful indignation and contempt for 
Fyodor Pavlovitch. He made the latter's acquaintance for the first time, 
and told him directly that he wished to undertake the child's education. 
He used long afterwards to tell as a characteristic touch, that when he 
began to speak of Mitya, Fyodor Pavlovitch looked for some time as 
though he did not understand what child he was talking about, and even 
as though he was surprised to hear that he had a little son in the house. 
The story may have been exaggerated, yet it must have been something 
like the truth. 
Fyodor Pavlovitch was all his life fond of acting, of suddenly playing 
an unexpected part, sometimes without any motive for doing so, and 
even to his own direct disadvantage, as, for instance, in the present case. 
This habit, however, is characteristic of a very great number of people, 
some of them very clever ones, not like Fyodor Pavlovitch. Pyotr 
Alexandrovitch carried the business through vigorously, and was 
appointed, with Fyodor Pavlovitch, joint guardian of the child, who had 
a small property, a house and land, left him by his mother. Mitya did, in 
fact, pass into this cousin's keeping, but as the latter had no family of 
his own, and after securing the revenues of his estates was in haste to 
return at once to Paris, he left the boy in charge of one of his cousins, a 
lady living in Moscow. It came to pass that, settling permanently in 
Paris he, too, forgot the child, especially when the Revolution of 
February broke out, making an impression on his mind that he 
remembered all the rest of his life. The Moscow lady died, and Mitya 
passed into the care of one of her married daughters. I believe he 
changed his home a fourth time later on. I won't enlarge upon that now, 
as I shall have much to tell later of Fyodor Pavlovitch's firstborn, and 
must confine myself now to the most essential facts about him, without 
which I could not begin my story. 
In the first place, this Mitya, or rather Dmitri Fyodorovitch, was the 
only one of Fyodor Pavlovitch's three sons who grew up in the belief
that he had property, and that he would be independent on coming of 
age. He spent an irregular boyhood and youth. He did not finish his 
studies at the gymnasium, he got into a military school, then went to 
the Caucasus, was promoted, fought a duel, and was degraded to the 
ranks, earned promotion again, led a wild life, and spent a good deal of 
money. He did not begin to receive any income from Fyodor 
Pavlovitch until he came of age, and until then got into debt. He saw 
and knew his father, Fyodor Pavlovitch, for the first time on coming of 
age, when he visited our neighbourhood on purpose to settle with him 
about his property. He seems not to have liked his father. He did not 
stay long with him, and made haste to get away, having only succeeded 
in obtaining a sum of money, and entering into an agreement for future 
payments from the estate, of the revenues and value of which he was 
unable (a fact worthy of note), upon this occasion, to get a statement    
    
		
	
	
	Continue reading on your phone by scaning this QR Code
	 	
	
	
	    Tip: The current page has been bookmarked automatically. If you wish to continue reading later, just open the 
Dertz Homepage, and click on the 'continue reading' link at the bottom of the page.