else 
would be that besides which there is nothing else.
That Truth is only another name for the positive state, or that the quest 
for Truth is the attempt to achieve positiveness: 
Scientists who have thought that they were seeking Truth, but who 
were trying to find out astronomic, or chemic, or biologic truths. But 
Truth is that besides which there is nothing: nothing to modify it, 
nothing to question it, nothing to form an exception: the all-inclusive, 
the complete-- 
By Truth I mean the Universal. 
So chemists have sought the true, or the real, and have always failed in 
their endeavors, because of the outside relations of chemical 
phenomena: have failed in the sense that never has a chemical law, 
without exceptions, been discovered: because chemistry is continuous 
with astronomy, physics, biology--For instance, if the sun should 
greatly change its distance from this earth, and if human life could 
survive, the familiar chemic formulas would no longer work out: a new 
science of chemistry would have to be learned-- 
Or that all attempts to find Truth in the special are attempts to find the 
universal in the local. 
And artists and their striving for positiveness, under the name of 
"harmony"--but their pigments that are oxydizing, or are responding to 
a deranging environment--or the strings of musical instruments that are 
differently and disturbingly adjusting to outside chemic and thermal 
and gravitational forces--again and again this oneness of all ideals, and 
that it is the attempt to be, or to achieve, locally, that which is 
realizable only universally. In our experience there is only 
intermediateness to harmony and discord. Harmony is that besides 
which there are no outside forces. 
And nations that have fought with only one motive: for individuality, or 
entity, or to be real, final nations, not subordinate to, or parts of, other 
nations. And that nothing but intermediateness has ever been attained, 
and that history is record of failures of this one attempt, because there 
always have been outside forces, or other nations contending for the
same goal. 
As to physical things, chemic, mineralogic, astronomic, it is not 
customary to say that they act to achieve Truth or Entity, but it is 
understood that all motions are toward Equilibrium: that there is no 
motion except toward Equilibrium, of course always away from some 
other approximation to Equilibrium. 
All biologic phenomena act to adjust: there are no biologic actions 
other than adjustments. 
Adjustment is another name for Equilibrium. Equilibrium is the 
Universal, or that which has nothing external to derange it. 
But that all that we call "being" is motion: and that all motion is the 
expression, not of equilibrium, but of equilibrating, or of equilibrium 
unattained: that life-motions are expressions of equilibrium unattained: 
that all thought relates to the unattained: that to have what is called 
being in our quasi-state, is not to be in the positive sense, or is to be 
intermediate to Equilibrium and Inequilibrium. 
So then: 
That all phenomena in our intermediate state, or quasi-state, represent 
this one attempt to organize, stabilize, harmonize, individualize--or to 
positivize, or to become real: 
That only to have seeming is to express failure or intermediateness to 
final failure and final success: 
That every attempt--that is observable--is defeated by Continuity, or by 
outside forces--or by the excluded that are continuous with the 
included: 
That our whole "existence" is an attempt by the relative to be the 
absolute, or by the local to be the universal. 
In this book, my interest is in this attempt as manifested in modern
science: 
That it has attempted to be real, true, final, complete, absolute: 
That, if the seeming of being, here, in our quasi-state, is the product of 
exclusion that is always false and arbitrary, if always are included and 
excluded continuous, the whole seeming system, or entity, of modern 
science is only quasi-system, or quasi-entity, wrought by the same false 
and arbitrary process as that by which the still less positive system that 
preceded it, or the theological system, wrought the illusion of its being. 
In this book, I assemble some of the data that I think are of the falsely 
and arbitrarily excluded. 
The data of the damned. 
I have gone into the outer darkness of scientific and philosophical 
transactions and proceedings, ultra-respectable, but covered with the 
dust of disregard. I have descended into journalism. I have come back 
with the quasi-souls of lost data. 
They will march. 
* * * * * 
As to the logic of our expressions to come-- 
That there is only quasi-logic in our mode of seeming: 
That nothing ever has been proved-- 
Because there is nothing to prove. 
When I say that there is nothing to prove, I mean that to those who 
accept Continuity, or the merging away of all phenomena into other 
phenomena, without positive demarcations one    
    
		
	
	
	Continue reading on your phone by scaning this QR Code
	 	
	
	
	    Tip: The current page has been bookmarked automatically. If you wish to continue reading later, just open the 
Dertz Homepage, and click on the 'continue reading' link at the bottom of the page.