Theories and the Balkan War, by 
Norman Angell 
 
Project Gutenberg's Peace Theories and the Balkan War, by Norman 
Angell This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and 
with almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away 
or re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included 
with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.net 
Title: Peace Theories and the Balkan War 
Author: Norman Angell 
Release Date: April 3, 2004 [EBook #11895] 
Language: English 
Character set encoding: ISO-8859-1 
*** START OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK PEACE 
THEORIES AND THE BALKAN WAR *** 
 
Produced by MBP and the Online Distributed Proofreading Team. 
 
THE BALKANS 
A HISTORY OF 
BULGARIA--SERBIA--GREECE--RUMANIA--TURKEY
THE BALKANS 
A HISTORY OF 
BULGARIA--SERBIA--GREECE--RUMANIA--TURKEY 
BY NEVILL FORBES, ARNOLD J. TOYNBEE, D. MITRANY, D.G. 
HOGARTH 
 
PREFACE 
The authors of this volume have not worked in conjunction. Widely 
separated, engaged on other duties, and pressed for time, we have had 
no opportunity for interchange of views. Each must be held responsible, 
therefore, for his own section alone. If there be any discrepancies in our 
writings (it is not unlikely in so disputed a field of history) we can only 
regret an unfortunate result of the circumstances. Owing to rapid 
change in the relations of our country to the several Balkan peoples, the 
tone of a section written earlier may differ from that of another written 
later. It may be well to state that the sections on Serbia and Bulgaria 
were finished before the decisive Balkan developments of the past two 
months. Those on Greece and Rumania represent only a little later 
stage of the evolution. That on Turkey, compiled between one mission 
abroad and another, was the latest to be finished. 
If our sympathies are not all the same, or given equally to friends and 
foes, none of us would find it possible to indite a Hymn of Hate about 
any Balkan people. Every one of these peoples, on whatever side he be 
fighting to-day, has a past worthy of more than our respect and 
interwoven in some intimate way with our history. That any one of 
them is arrayed against us to-day is not to be laid entirely or chiefly at 
its own door. They are all fine peoples who have not obtained their 
proper places in the sun. The best of the Osmanli nation, the Anatolian 
peasantry, has yet to make its physical and moral qualities felt under 
civilized conditions. As for the rest--the Serbs and the Bulgars, who 
have enjoyed brief moments of barbaric glory in their past, have still to
find themselves in that future which shall be to the Slav. The Greeks, 
who were old when we were not as yet, are younger now than we. They 
are as incalculable a factor in a political forecast as another Chosen 
Race, the Jews. Their past is the world's glory: the present in the Near 
East is theirs more than any people's: the future--despite the laws of 
corporate being and decline, dare we say they will have no part in it? 
Of Rumania what are we to think? Her mixed people has had the start 
of the Balkan Slavs in modern civilization, and evidently her 
boundaries must grow wider yet. But the limits of her possible 
expansion are easier to set than those of the rest. 
We hope we have dealt fairly with all these peoples. Mediaeval history, 
whether of the East or the West, is mostly a record of bloodshedding 
and cruelty; and the Middle Age has been prolonged to our own time in 
most parts of the Balkans, and is not yet over in some parts. There are 
certain things salutary to bear in mind when we think or speak of any 
part of that country to-day. First, that less than two hundred years ago, 
England had its highwaymen on all roads, and its smuggler dens and 
caravans, Scotland its caterans, and Ireland its moonlighters. Second, 
that religious fervour has rarely mitigated and generally increased our 
own savagery. Thirdly, that our own policy in Balkan matters has been 
none too wise, especially of late. In permitting the Treaty of Bucarest 
three years ago, we were parties to making much of the trouble that has 
ensued, and will ensue again. If we have not been able to write about 
the Near East under existing circumstances altogether sine ira et studio, 
we have tried to remember that each of its peoples has a case. 
D.G. HOGARTH. 
November, 1915. 
 
CONTENTS 
BULGARIA AND SERBIA. By NEVILL FORBES. 
1. Introductory 2. The Balkan Peninsula in Classical Times 400 B.C. -
A.D. 500 3. The Arrival of the Slavs in the Balkan Peninsula, A.D. 
500-650 
BULGARIA. 
4. The Arrival of the Bulgars in the Balkan Peninsula, 600-700 5. The 
Early Years of Bulgaria and    
    
		
	
	
	Continue reading on your phone by scaning this QR Code
 
	 	
	
	
	    Tip: The current page has been bookmarked automatically. If you wish to continue reading later, just open the 
Dertz Homepage, and click on the 'continue reading' link at the bottom of the page.
	    
	    
