into his head to elaborate such a tale." He 
could not dwell in the unbroken gloom dear to some modern 
malingerers. But he could easily have made a tale of common Scotch 
life, dark with the sorrow of Mucklebackit, and bright with the mirth of 
Cuddie Headrigg. There was, however, this difficulty,--that Scott cared 
not to write a story of a single class. "From the peer to the ploughman," 
all society mingles in each of his novels. A fiction of middle-class life 
did not allure him, and he was not at the best, but at his worst, as 
Sydney Smith observed, in the light talk of society. He could admire 
Miss Austen, and read her novels again and again; but had he attempted 
to follow her, by way of variety, then inevitably wild as well as 
disciplined humour would have kept breaking in, and his fancy would 
have wandered like the old knights of Arthur's Court, "at adventure." 
"St. Ronan's Well" proved the truth of all this. Thus it happens that, in 
"The Antiquary," with all his sympathy for the people, with all his
knowledge of them, he does not confine himself to their cottages. As 
Lockhart says, in his admirable piece of criticism, he preferred to 
choose topics in which he could display "his highest art, that of skilful 
contrast." 
Even the tragic romance of "Waverley" does not set off its 
Macwheebles and Callum Begs better than the oddities of Jonathan 
Oldbuck and his circle are relieved, on the one hand by the stately 
gloom of the Glenallans, on the other by the stern affliction of the poor 
fisherman, who, when discovered repairing "the auld black bitch of a 
boat," in which his boy had been lost, and congratulated by his visitors 
on being capable of the exertion, makes answer, "And what would you 
have me to do, unless I wanted to see four children starve, because one 
is drowned? It 's weel with you gentles, that can sit in the house with 
handkerchers at your een, when ye lose a friend; but the like o' us maun 
to our work again, if our hearts were beating as hard as ony hammer." 
And to his work again Scott had to go when he lost the partner of his 
life. 
The simple unsought charm which Lockhart notes in "The Antiquary" 
may have passed away in later works, when what had been the 
amusement of happy days became the task of sadness. But this magic 
"The Antiquary" keeps perhaps beyond all its companions,--the magic 
of pleasant memories and friendly associations. The sketches of the 
epoch of expected invasion, with its patriotic musters and volunteer 
drillings, are pictures out of that part in the author's life which, with his 
early Highland wanderings ("Waverley") and his Liddesdale raids 
("Guy Mannering"), was most dear to him. In "Redgauntlet," again, he 
makes, as Alan Fairford, a return on his youth and his home, and in 
"Rob Roy" he revives his Highland recollections, his Highland lairds of 
"the blawing, bleezing stories." None of the rest of the tales are so 
intimate in their connection with Scott's own personal history. "The 
Antiquary" has always, therefore, been held in the very first rank of his 
novels. 
As far as plot goes, though Godwin denied that it had any story, "The 
Antiquary" may be placed among the most careful. The underplot of 
the Glenallans, gloomy almost beyond endurance, is very ingeniously 
made to unravel the mystery of Lovel. The other side-narrative, that of 
Dousterswivel, is the weak point of the whole; but this Scott justifies
by "very late instances of the force of superstitious credulity, to a much 
greater extent." Some occurrence of the hour may have suggested the 
knavish adept with his divining-rod. But facts are never a real excuse 
for the morally incredible, or all but incredible, in fiction. On the 
wealth and vraisemblance and variety of character it were superfluous 
to dilate. As in Shakspeare, there is not even a minor person but lives 
and is of flesh and blood, if we except, perhaps, Dousterswivel and Sir 
Arthur Wardour. Sir Arthur is only Sir Robert Hazlewood over again, 
with a slightly different folly and a somewhat more amiable nature. 
Lovel's place, as usual, is among the shades of heroes, and his 
love-affair is far less moving, far more summarily treated, than that of 
Jenny Caxon. The skilful contrasts are perhaps most remarkable when 
we compare Elspeth of the Burnfoot with the gossiping old women in 
the post-office at Fairport,--a town studied perhaps from Arbroath. It 
was the opinion of Sydney Smith that every one of the novels, before 
"The Fortunes of Nigel," contained a Meg Merrilies and a Dominie 
Sampson. He may have recognized a male Meg in Edie Ochiltree,--the 
invaluable character who is always behind a wall,    
    
		
	
	
	Continue reading on your phone by scaning this QR Code
	 	
	
	
	    Tip: The current page has been bookmarked automatically. If you wish to continue reading later, just open the 
Dertz Homepage, and click on the 'continue reading' link at the bottom of the page.