brought the right book, the 
right reviewer, and the properly-tuned editors together, I am bound to 
say that I think that the editors were right and that I had produced good 
copy. At any rate, their view being what it was, I have no sort of doubt 
that they were quite right to express it as plainly and as generously as 
they did to me. To have followed the conventional rule of not puffing 
up a young man with praise and to have guarded their true opinion as a 
kind of guilty secret would have been distinctly unfair to me, nay, 
prejudicial. There are, I suppose, a certain number of young people to 
whom it would be unsafe to give a full measure of eulogy. But these 
are a small minority. The ordinary young man or young woman is 
much more likely to be encouraged or sometimes even alarmed by 
unstinted praise. Generous encouragement is the necessary mental 
nourishment of youth, and those who withhold it from them are not 
only foolish but cruel. They are keeping food from the hungry. 
If my editors had told me that they thought the review rather a poor 
piece of work, I should, by "the law of reversed effort," have been 
almost certain to have taken up a combative line and have convinced 
myself that it was epoch-making. When a man thinks himself 
overpraised, if he has anything in him at all, he begins to get anxious 
about his next step. He is put very much on his mettle not to lose what 
he has gained. 
It may amuse my readers, if I quote a few sentences from the article, 
and allow them to see whether their judgment coincides with that of my 
chiefs at The Spectator on a matter which was for me fraught with the 
decrees of Destiny. This is how I began my review of Swift and his 
masterpiece: 
"Never anyone living thought like you," said to Swift the woman who 
loved him with a passion that had caught some of his own fierceness 
and despair. The love which great natures inspire had endowed Vanessa
with a rare inspiration. Half-consciously she has touched the notes that 
help us to resolve the discord in Swift's life. Truly, the mind of living 
man never worked as Swift's worked. That this is so is visible in every 
line, in every word he ever wrote. No phrase of his is like any other 
man's; no conception of his is ever cast in the common mould. It is this 
that lends something so dreadful and mysterious to all Swift's writings. 
From this time I began to get books regularly from The Spectator and 
to pay periodical visits to the office, where I learned to understand and 
to appreciate my chiefs. But more of them later. The year 1886 was one 
of political convulsion, the year of the great split in the Liberal Party; 
the year in which Lord Hartington and Mr. Chamberlain finally severed 
themselves from Mr. Gladstone and began that co- operation with the 
Conservatives which resulted in the formation of the Unionist Party. I 
do not, however, want to deal here with the Unionist crisis, except so 
far as it affected me and The Spectator. While my father and my elder 
brother remained Liberals and followed Mr. Gladstone, I followed Lord 
Hartington, Mr. Chamberlain, and Mr. Goschen. My conversion was 
not in any way sought by my new friends and chiefs at The Spectator 
office, though they at once took the Unionist side. I have no doubt, 
however, that my intercourse with Hutton and Townsend had its effect, 
though I also think that my mind was naturally Unionist in politics. I 
was already a Lincoln worshipper in American history and desired 
closer union with the Dominions, not separation. I was for 
concentration, not dispersion, in the Empire. In any case, I took the 
plunge, one which might have been painful if my father had not been 
the most just, the most fair-minded, and the most kind-hearted of men. 
Although he was an intense, nay, a fierce Gladstonian, I never had the 
slightest feeling of estrangement from him or he from me. It happened, 
however, that the break-up of the Liberal Party affected me greatly at 
The Spectator. When the election of 1886 took place, I was asked by a 
friend and Somersetshire neighbour, Mr. Henry Hobhouse, who had 
become, like me, a Liberal Unionist, to act as his election agent. This I 
did, though, as a matter of fact, he was unopposed. The moment he was 
declared elected I made out my return as election agent and went 
straight back to my work in London. Almost at once I received a letter 
which surprised me enormously. It was from Mr. Hutton, telling me
that Mr.    
    
		
	
	
	Continue reading on your phone by scaning this QR Code
 
	 	
	
	
	    Tip: The current page has been bookmarked automatically. If you wish to continue reading later, just open the 
Dertz Homepage, and click on the 'continue reading' link at the bottom of the page.
	    
	    
