indicated where the goal of physical 
science really lay. However, Descartes was an eminent mathematician, 
and it would seem that the bent of his mind led him to overestimate the 
value of deductive reasoning from general principles, as much as Bacon 
had underestimated it. The progress of physical science has been 
effected neither by Baconians nor by Cartesians, as such, but by men 
like Galileo and Harvey, Boyle and Newton, who would have done 
their work just as well if neither Bacon nor Descartes had ever 
propounded their views respecting the manner in which scientific 
investigation should be pursued. 
[Sidenote: For a time the progress without fruits.] 
The progress of science, during the first century after Bacon's death, by 
means verified his sanguine prediction of the fruits which it would 
yield. For, though the revived and renewed study of nature had spread 
and grown to an extent which surpassed reasonable expectation, the 
practical results--the 'good to men's estate'--were, at first, by no means 
apparent. Sixty years after Bacon's death, Newton had crowned the 
long labors of the astronomers and the physicists, by coordinating the
phenomena of solar motion throughout the visible universe into one 
vast system; but the 'Principia' helped no man to either wealth or 
comfort. Descartes, Newton, and Leibnitz had opened up new worlds to 
the mathematician, but the acquisitions of their genius enriched only 
man's ideal estate. Descartes had laid the foundations of rational 
cosmogony and of physiological psychology; Boyle had produced 
models of experimentation in various branches of physics and 
chemistry; Pascal and Torricelli had weighed the air; Malpighi and 
Grew, Ray and Willoughby had done work of no less importance in the 
biological sciences; but weaving and spinning were carried on with the 
old appliances; nobody could travel faster by sea or by land than at any 
previous time in the world's history, and King George could send a 
message from London to York no faster than King John might have 
done. Metals were worked from their ores by immemorial rule of 
thumb, and the centre of the iron trade of these islands was still among 
the oak forests of Sussex. The utmost skill of our mechanicians did not 
get beyond the production of a coarse watch. 
The middle of the eighteenth century is illustrated by a host of great 
names in science--English, French, German, and Italian--especially in 
the fields of chemistry, geology, and biology; but this deepening and 
broadening of natural knowledge produced next to no immediate 
practical benefits. Even if, at this time, Francis Bacon could have 
returned to the scene of his greatness and of his littleness, he must have 
regarded the philosophic world which praised and disregarded his 
precepts with great disfavor. If ghosts are consistent, he would have 
said, 'These people are all wasting their time, just as Gilbert and Kepler 
and Galileo and my worthy physician Harvey did in my day. Where are 
the fruits of the restoration of science which I promised? This 
accumulation of bare knowledge is all very well, but cui bono? Not one 
of these people is doing what I told him specially to do, and seeking 
that secret of the cause of forms which will enable men to deal, at will, 
with matter, and superinduce new natures upon the old foundations.' 
[Sidenote: Its recent effect on life.] 
But, a little later, that growth of knowledge beyond imaginable
utilitarian ends, which is the condition precedent of its practical utility, 
began to produce some effect upon practical life; and the operation of 
that part of nature we call human upon the rest began to create, not 
'new natures,' in Bacon's sense, but a new Nature, the existence of 
which is dependent upon men's efforts, which is subservient to their 
wants, and which would disappear if man's shaping and guiding hand 
were withdrawn. Every mechanical artifice, every chemically pure 
substance employed in manufacture, every abnormally fertile race of 
plants, or rapidly growing and fattening breed of animals, is a part of 
the new Nature created by science. Without it, the most densely 
populated regions of modern Europe and America must retain their 
primitive, sparsely inhabited, agricultural or pastoral condition; it is the 
foundation of our wealth and the condition of our safety from 
submergence by another flood of barbarous hordes; it is the bond which 
unites into a solid political whole, regions larger than any empire of 
antiquity; it secures us from the recurrence of the pestilences and 
famines of former times; it is the source of endless comforts and 
conveniences, which are not mere luxuries, but conduce to physical and 
moral well-being. During the last fifty years, this new birth of time, this 
new Nature begotten by science upon fact, has pressed itself daily and 
hourly upon our attention, and has worked miracles which have 
modified the whole    
    
		
	
	
	Continue reading on your phone by scaning this QR Code
	 	
	
	
	    Tip: The current page has been bookmarked automatically. If you wish to continue reading later, just open the 
Dertz Homepage, and click on the 'continue reading' link at the bottom of the page.