on Cellulose, by C. F. Cross and 
E. J. Bevan 
 
Project Gutenberg's Researches on Cellulose, by C. F. Cross and E. J. 
Bevan This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and 
with almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away 
or re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included 
with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org 
Title: Researches on Cellulose 1895-1900 
Author: C. F. Cross E. J. Bevan 
Release Date: September 16, 2007 [EBook #22620] 
Language: English 
Character set encoding: ISO-8859-1 
*** START OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK 
RESEARCHES ON CELLULOSE *** 
 
Produced by Juliet Sutherland, Josephine Paolucci and the Online 
Distributed Proofreading Team at http://www.pgdp.net. (This file was 
produced from images generously made available by The Internet 
Archive/Million Book Project). 
 
RESEARCHES ON CELLULOSE
1895-1900 
BY 
CROSS & BEVAN 
(C. F. CROSS AND E. J. BEVAN) 
SECOND EDITION 
LONGMANS, GREEN, AND CO. 39 PATERNOSTER ROW, 
LONDON NEW YORK, BOMBAY, AND CALCUTTA 
1907 
All rights reserved 
* * * * * 
Transcriber's note: 
For Text: A word surrounded by a cedilla such as ~this~ signifies that 
the word is bolded in the text. A word surrounded by underscores like 
this signifies the word is italics in the text. The italic and bold markup 
for single italized letters (such as variables in equations) and "foreign" 
abbreviations are deleted for easier reading. 
For numbers and equations: Parentheses have been added to clarify 
fractions. Underscores before bracketed numbers in equations denote a 
subscript. Superscripts are designated with a caret and brackets, e.g. 
11.1^{3} is 11.1 to the third power. Greek letters in equations are 
translated to their English version. 
The sections in the Table of Contents are not used in the actual text. 
They have been added for clarity. 
Minor typos have been corrected and footnotes moved to the end of the 
sections
* * * * * 
 
PREFACE TO SECOND EDITION 
This edition is a reprint of the first in response to a continuous demand 
for the book. The matter, consisting as it does largely of records, does 
not call for any revision, and, as a contribution to the development of 
theory, any particular interest which it has is associated with the date at 
which it was written. 
The volume which has since appeared is the sequel, and aims at an 
exposition of the subject "to date". 
 
PREFACE 
This volume, which is intended as a supplement to the work which we 
published in 1895, gives a brief account of researches which have been 
subsequently published, as well as of certain of our own investigations, 
the results of which are now for the first time recorded. 
We have not attempted to give the subject-matter the form of a 
connected record. The contributions to the study of 'Cellulose' which 
are noticed are spread over a large area, are mostly 'sectional' in their 
aim, and the only cohesion which we can give them is that of 
classifying them according to the plan of our original work. Their 
subject-matter is reproduced in the form of a précis, as much 
condensed as possible; of the more important papers the original title is 
given. In all cases we have endeavoured to reproduce the Author's main 
conclusions, and in most cases without comment or criticism. 
Specialists will note that the basis of investigation is still in a great 
measure empirical; and of this the most obvious criterion is the 
confusion attaching to the use of the very word 'Cellulose.' This is due 
to various causes, one of which is the curious specialisation of the term 
in Germany as the equivalent of 'wood cellulose.' The restriction of this
general or group term has had an influence even in scientific circles. 
Another influence preventing the recognition of the obvious and, as we 
think, inevitable basis of classification of the 'celluloses' is the 
empiricism of the methods of agricultural chemistry, which as regards 
cellulose are so far chiefly concerned with its negative characteristics 
and the analytical determination of the indigestible residue of fodder 
plants. Physiologists, again, have their own views and methods in 
dealing with cellulose, and have hitherto had but little regard to the 
work of the chemist in differentiating and classifying the celluloses on 
a systematic basis. There are many sides to the subject, and it is only by 
a sustained effort towards centralisation that the general recognition of 
a systematic basis can be secured. 
We may, we hope usefully, direct attention to the conspicuous neglect 
of the subject in this country. To the matter of the present volume, 
excluding our own investigations, there are but two contributions from 
English laboratories. We invite the younger generation of students of 
chemistry to measure the probability of finding a working career in 
connection with the cellulose industries. They will not    
    
		
	
	
	Continue reading on your phone by scaning this QR Code
 
	 	
	
	
	    Tip: The current page has been bookmarked automatically. If you wish to continue reading later, just open the 
Dertz Homepage, and click on the 'continue reading' link at the bottom of the page.
	    
	    
