Soult's army. We found the soldiers' huts very comfortable; 
they were built of branches of trees and furze, and formed squares and 
streets, which had names placarded up, such as Rue de Paris, Rue de 
Versailles, &c. We were not sorry to find ourselves in such 
commodious quarters, as well as being well housed. The scenery 
surrounding the camp was picturesque and grand. From our elevated 
position, immediately in front, we commanded a wide and extensive 
plain, intersected by two important rivers, the Nive and the Nivelle. On 
the right, the lofty Pyrenees, with their grand and varied outline, stood 
forth conspicuously in a blue, cloudless sky; on our left was the Bay of 
Biscay, with our cruisers perpetually on the move. 
We witnessed from the camp, one night about twelve o'clock, a fight at 
sea, between an English brig and a French corvette, which was leaving 
the Adour with provisions and ammunition. She was chased by the brig, 
and brought to action. The night was sufficiently clear to enable us to 
discover distinctly the position of the vessels and the measured flash of 
their guns. They were at close quarters, and in less than half an hour we 
discovered the crew of the corvette taking to their boats. Shortly 
afterwards the vessel blew up with a loud explosion. We came to the 
conclusion that sea-fighting was more agreeable than land-fighting, as 
the crews of the vessels engaged without previous heavy marching, and 
with loose light clothing; there was no manoeuvring or standing for 
hours on the defensive; the wounded were immediately taken below 
and attended to, and the whole affair was over in a pleasingly brief 
period. 
 
THE UNIFORM AND BEARING OF THE FRENCH SOLDIER 
The French infantry soldier averaged about five feet five or six in 
height; in build they were much about what they are now, perhaps a 
little broader over the shoulder. They were smart, active, handy fellows,
and much more able to look after their personal comforts than British 
soldiers, as their camps indicated. The uniform of those days consisted 
in a schako, which spread out at the top; a short-waisted, 
swallow-tailed coat; and large, baggy trousers and gaiters. The clothing 
of the French soldier was roomy, and enabled him to march and move 
about at ease: no pipeclay accessories occupied their attention; in a 
word, their uniforms and accoutrements were infinitely superior to our 
own, taking into consideration the practical necessities of warfare. 
Their muskets were inferior to ours, and their firing less deadly. The 
French cavalry we thought badly horsed; but their uniforms, though 
showy, were, like those of the infantry, comfortably large and roomy. 
I have frequently remarked that firearms are of little use to the mounted 
soldier, and often an incumbrance to man and horse. Cavalry want only 
one arm - the sabre. Let the men be well mounted and at home in the 
saddle. It requires great knowledge in a Commander-in-chief to know 
when and how to use his cavalry. It has been my misfortune to witness 
oft-repeated blunders in the employment of the best-mounted regiments 
in the world. I consider the French generals had more knowledge of the 
use of cavalry than our own, when a great battle was to be fought. 
 
MAJOR-GENERAL STEWART AND LORD WELLINGTON 
 
If the present generation of Englishmen would take the trouble of 
looking at the newspaper which fifty years ago informed the British 
public of passing events both at home and abroad, they would, 
doubtless, marvel at the very limited and imperfect amount of 
intelligence which the best journals were enabled to place before their 
readers. The progress of the Peninsular campaign was very imperfectly 
chronicled; it will, therefore, be easily imagined what interest was 
attached to certain letters that appeared in the Morning Chronicle which 
criticised with much severity, and frequently with considerable 
injustice, the military movements of Lord Wellington's Spanish 
campaign. 
The attention of the Commander-in-Chief being drawn to these 
periodical and personal comments on his conduct of the war, his 
lordship at once perceived from the information which they contained 
that they must have been written by an officer holding a high command
under him. Determined to ascertain the author - who, in addressing a 
public journal, was violating the Articles of War, and, it might be, 
assisting the enemy - means were employed in London to identify the 
writer. The result was, that Lord Wellington discovered the author of 
the letters to be no other than Sir Charles Stewart, the late Lord 
Londonderry. As soon as Lord Wellington had made himself master of 
this fact, he summoned Sir Charles Stewart to head-quarters at Torres 
Vedras; and on his appearance, he, without the least preface, addressed 
him thus: - 
"Charles Stewart, I have ascertained with deep regret that you    
    
		
	
	
	Continue reading on your phone by scaning this QR Code
	 	
	
	
	    Tip: The current page has been bookmarked automatically. If you wish to continue reading later, just open the 
Dertz Homepage, and click on the 'continue reading' link at the bottom of the page.