Recent Tendencies in Ethics - 
Three Lectures to Clergy Given 
at Cambridge 
 
The Project Gutenberg eBook, Recent Tendencies in Ethics, by 
William Ritchie Sorley 
This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with 
almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or 
re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included 
with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.net 
 
Title: Recent Tendencies in Ethics 
Author: William Ritchie Sorley 
Release Date: June 2, 2004 [eBook #12492] 
Language: English 
Character set encoding: ISO-8859-1 
***START OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK RECENT 
TENDENCIES IN ETHICS*** 
E-text prepared by the Project Gutenberg Online Distributed 
Proofreading Team from images provided by the Million Book Project 
 
RECENT TENDENCIES IN ETHICS 
Three Lectures to Clergy Given at Cambridge 
BY 
W. R. SORLEY, M.A. HON. LL.D. EDIN. 
Knightbridge Professor of Moral Philosophy 
MCMIV 
 
PREFACE 
These lectures were given to a summer meeting of clergy, held at
Cambridge in the month of July last. Some passages have been added 
as they were written out for the press, and the crudities of the spoken 
word have, I hope, been pruned away; but, in other respects, the 
original plan of the lectures has been retained. They are now published 
in the hope that they may prove of interest to those who heard them, 
and to others who may desire an account, in short compass and in 
popular form, of some leading features of the ethical thought of the 
present day. 
It is inevitable for such an account to be controversial: otherwise it 
could not give a true picture of contemporary opinion. Intellectual and 
social causes have conspired to accentuate traditional differences in 
ethics, and to make the questions in dispute penetrate to the very heart 
of morality. It has been my aim to trace the new influences which are at 
work, and to estimate the value of the ethical doctrines to which they 
have seemed to lead. The estimate has taken the form of a criticism, but 
the criticism is in the interests of construction. 
W.R. SORLEY. 
CAMBRIDGE, 7th March, 1904. 
 
CONTENTS. 
I. CHARACTERISTICS II. ETHICS AND EVOLUTION III. ETHICS 
AND IDEALISM 
INDEX 
 
I. 
CHARACTERISTICS. 
A survey of ethical thought, especially English ethical thought, during 
the last century would have to lay stress upon one characteristic feature. 
It was limited in range,--limited, one may say, by its regard for the 
importance of the facts with which it had to deal. The thought of the 
period was certainly not without controversy; it was indeed 
controversial almost to a fault. But the controversies of the time centred 
almost exclusively round two questions: the question of the origin of 
moral ideas, and the question of the criterion of moral value. These 
questions were of course traditional in the schools of philosophy; and 
for more than a century English moralists were mainly occupied with
inherited topics of debate. They gave precision to the questions under 
discussion; and their controversies defined the traditional opposition of 
ethical opinion, and separated moralists into two hostile schools known 
as Utilitarian and Intuitionist. 
As regards the former question--that of the origin of moral ideas--the 
Utilitarian School held that they could be traced to experience; and by 
'experience' they meant in the last resort sense-perceptions and the 
feelings of pleasure and of pain which accompany or follow 
sense-perception. All the facts of our moral consciousness, 
therefore,--the knowledge of right and wrong, the judgments of 
conscience, the recognition of duty and responsibility, the feelings of 
reverence, remorse, and moral indignation,--all these could be traced, 
they thought, to an origin in experience, to an origin which in the last 
resort was sensuous, that is, due to the perceptions of the senses and the 
feelings of pleasure and pain which accompany or follow them. 
With regard to the criterion or standard of morality,--the second 
question to which I have to call attention,--they held that the distinction 
between right and wrong depended upon the consequences of an action 
in the way of pleasure and pain. That action was right which on the 
whole and in the long run would bring pleasure or happiness to those 
whom it affected: that action was wrong which on the whole and in the 
long run would bring pain rather than pleasure to those whom it 
affected. 
From their view as to the origin of moral ideas, the school might more 
properly be called the Empirical School. It is from their views on the 
question of the standard of value, or the criterion of morality, that it 
claimed, and that it received, the name Utilitarian[1]. On both these 
points the Utilitarian School was opposed by an energetic but less 
compact body of writers, known as Intuitionists. 
[Footnote 1: It seems to have been through J.S. Mill's influence that    
    
		
	
	
	Continue reading on your phone by scaning this QR Code
 
	 	
	
	
	    Tip: The current page has been bookmarked automatically. If you wish to continue reading later, just open the 
Dertz Homepage, and click on the 'continue reading' link at the bottom of the page.
	    
	    
