work devoted to the purpose. The awful 
revelations of the Journey through the Kingdom of Oude largely 
influenced the Court of Directors and the Imperial Government in 
forming their decision to annex the kingdom, although that decision 
was directly opposed to the advice of Sleeman, who consistently 
advocated reform of the administration, while deprecating annexation. 
His views are stated with absolute precision in a letter written in 1854 
or 1855, and published in The Times in November, 1857: 
We have no right to annex or confiscate Oude; but we have a right, 
under the treaty of 1837, to take the management of it, but not to 
appropriate its revenues to ourselves. We can do this with honour to 
our Government and benefit to the people. To confiscate would be 
dishonest and dishonourable. To annex would be to give the people a 
government almost as bad as their own, if we put our screw upon them 
(Journey, ed. 1858, vol. i, Intro., p. xxi).
The earnest efforts of the Resident to suppress crime and improve the 
administration of Oudh aroused the bitter resentment of a corrupt court 
and exposed his life to constant danger. Three deliberate attempts to 
assassinate him at Lucknow are recorded. 
The first, in December, 1851, is described in detail in a letter of 
Sleeman's dated the 16th of that month, and less fully by General 
Hervey, in Some Records of Crime, vol. ii, p. 479. The Resident's life 
was saved by a gallant orderly named Tîkarâm, who was badly 
wounded. Inquiry proved that the crime was instigated by the King's 
moonshee. 
The second attempt, on October 9, 1853, is fully narrated in an official 
letter to the Government of India (Bibliography, No. 15). Its failure 
may be reasonably ascribed to a special interposition of Providence. 
The Resident during all the years he had lived at Lucknow had been in 
the habit of sleeping in an upper chamber approached by a separate 
private staircase guarded by two sentries. On the night mentioned the 
sentries were drugged and two men stole up the stairs. They slashed at 
the bed with their swords, but found it empty, because on that one 
occasion General Sleeman had slept in another room. 
The third attempt was not carried as far, and the exact date is not 
ascertainable, but the incident is well remembered by the family and 
occurred between 1853 and 1856. One day the Resident was crossing 
his study when, for some reason or another, he looked behind a curtain 
screening a recess. He then saw a man standing there with a large knife 
in his hand. General Sleeman, who was unarmed, challenged the man 
as being a Thug. He at once admitted that he was such, and under the 
spell of a master-spirit allowed himself to be disarmed without 
resistance. He had been employed at the Residency for some time, 
unsuspected. 
Such personal risks produced no effect on the stout heart of Sleeman, 
who continued, unshaken and undismayed, his unselfish labours. 
In 1854 the long strain of forty-five years' service broke down 
Sleeman's strong constitution. He tried to regain health by a visit to the
hills, but this expedient proved ineffectual, and he was ordered home. 
On the 10th of February, 1856, while on his way home on board the 
Monarch, he died off Ceylon, at the age of sixty-seven, and was buried 
at sea, just six days after he had been granted the dignity of K.C.B. 
Lord Dalhousie's desire to meet his trusted officer was never gratified. 
The following correspondence between the Governor-General and 
Sleeman, now published for the first time, is equally creditable to both 
parties: 
BARRACKPORE PARK, January 9th, 1856. MY DEAR GENERAL 
SLEEMAN, I have heard to-day of your arrival in Calcutta, and have 
heard at the same time with sincere concern that you are still suffering 
in health. A desire to disturb you as little as possible induces me to 
have recourse to my pen, in order to convey to you a communication 
which I had hoped to be able to make in person. Some time since, when 
adjusting the details connected with my retirement from the 
Government of India, I solicited permission to recommend to Her 
Majesty's gracious consideration the names of some who seemed to me 
to be worthy of Her Majesty's favour. My request was moderate. I 
asked only to be allowed to submit the name of one officer from each 
Presidency. The name which is selected from the Bengal army was 
your own, and I ventured to express my hope that Her Majesty would 
be pleased to mark her sense of the long course of able, and honourable, 
and distinguished service through which you had passed, by conferring 
upon you the civil cross of a Knight Commander of the Bath. As yet no 
reply    
    
		
	
	
	Continue reading on your phone by scaning this QR Code
	 	
	
	
	    Tip: The current page has been bookmarked automatically. If you wish to continue reading later, just open the 
Dertz Homepage, and click on the 'continue reading' link at the bottom of the page.