A free download from www.dertz.in       
 
Peter Bell the Third 
by Percy Bysshe Shelley 
PETER BELL THE THIRD. 
BY MICHING MALLECHO, ESQ. 
Is it a party in a parlour,
Crammed just as they on earth were 
crammed,
Some sipping punch--some sipping tea;
But, as you by 
their faces see,
All silent, and all--damned!
"Peter Bell", by W. 
WORDSWORTH. 
OPHELIA.--What means this, my lord?
HAMLET.--Marry, this is 
Miching Mallecho; it means mischief. SHAKESPEARE. 
DEDICATION. 
TO THOMAS BROWN, ESQ., THE YOUNGER, H.F. 
DEAR TOM--Allow me to request you to introduce Mr. Peter Bell to 
the respectable family of the Fudges. Although he may fall short of 
those very considerable personages in the more active properties which 
characterize the Rat and the Apostate, I suspect that even you, their 
historian, will confess that he surpasses them in the more peculiarly 
legitimate qualification of intolerable dulness. 
You know Mr. Examiner Hunt; well--it was he who presented me to 
two of the Mr. Bells. My intimacy with the younger Mr. Bell naturally 
sprung from this introduction to his brothers. And in presenting him to 
you, I have the satisfaction of being able to assure you that he is 
considerably the dullest of the three. 
There is this particular advantage in an acquaintance with any one of 
the Peter Bells, that if you know one Peter Bell, you know three Peter
Bells; they are not one, but three; not three, but one. An awful mystery, 
which, after having caused torrents of blood, and having been hymned 
by groans enough to deafen the music of the spheres, is at length 
illustrated to the satisfaction of all parties in the theological world, by 
the nature of Mr. Peter Bell. 
Peter is a polyhedric Peter, or a Peter with many sides. He changes 
colours like a chameleon, and his coat like a snake. He is a Proteus of a 
Peter. He was at first sublime, pathetic, impressive, profound; then dull; 
then prosy and dull; and now dull--oh so very dull! it is an 
ultra-legitimate dulness. 
You will perceive that it is not necessary to consider Hell and the Devil 
as supernatural machinery. The whole scene of my epic is in 'this world 
which is'--so Peter informed us before his conversion to "White Obi"-- 
'The world of all of us, AND WHERE
WE FIND OUR 
HAPPINESS, OR NOT AT ALL.' 
Let me observe that I have spent six or seven days in composing this 
sublime piece; the orb of my moonlike genius has made the fourth part 
of its revolution round the dull earth which you inhabit, driving you 
mad, while it has retained its calmness and its splendour, and I have 
been fitting this its last phase 'to occupy a permanent station in the 
literature of my country.' 
Your works, indeed, dear Tom, sell better; but mine are far superior. 
The public is no judge; posterity sets all to rights. 
Allow me to observe that so much has been written of Peter Bell, that 
the present history can be considered only, like the Iliad, as a 
continuation of that series of cyclic poems, which have already been 
candidates for bestowing immortality upon, at the same time that they 
receive it from, his character and adventures. In this point of view I 
have violated no rule of syntax in beginning my composition with a 
conjunction; the full stop which closes the poem continued by me being, 
like the full stops at the end of the Iliad and Odyssey, a full stop of a 
very qualified import.
Hoping that the immortality which you have given to the Fudges, you 
will receive from them; and in the firm expectation, that when London 
shall be an habitation of bitterns; when St. Paul's and Westminster 
Abbey shall stand, shapeless and nameless ruins, in the midst of an 
unpeopled marsh; when the piers of Waterloo Bridge shall become the 
nuclei of islets of reeds and osiers, and cast the jagged shadows of their 
broken arches on the solitary stream, some transatlantic commentator 
will be weighing in the scales of some new and now unimagined 
system of criticism, the respective merits of the Bells and the Fudges, 
and their historians. I remain, dear Tom, yours sincerely, 
MICHING MALLECHO. 
December 1, 1819. 
P.S.--Pray excuse the date of place; so soon as the profits of the 
publication come in, I mean to hire lodgings in a more respectable 
street. 
PROLOGUE. 
Peter Bells, one, two and three,
O'er the wide world wandering be.--
First, the antenatal Peter,
Wrapped in weeds of the same metre,
The so-long-predestined raiment
Clothed in which to walk his way 
meant
The second Peter; whose ambition
Is to link the proposition,
As the mean of two extremes--
(This was learned from Aldric's 
themes)
Shielding from the guilt of schism
The orthodoxal 
syllogism;
The First Peter--he who was
Like the shadow in the 
glass
Of the second, yet unripe,
His substantial antitype.-- 
Then came    
    
		
	
	
	Continue reading on your phone by scaning this QR Code
 
	 	
	
	
	    Tip: The current page has been bookmarked automatically. If you wish to continue reading later, just open the 
Dertz Homepage, and click on the 'continue reading' link at the bottom of the page.
	    
	    
