plant, and in a few years starved it out. Ten 
years will make a banyan sapling, or a pipal, into a sturdy trunk, and lo, 
by that time, in some visitation of drought or cholera or smallpox, or 
because some housewife was childless, coloured threads are being tied 
upon the tree or some rude symbolic painting put upon it. Then an 
ascetic comes along and seats himself in its shade, and now, already, a 
sacred institution has been established that it would raise a riot to try to 
remove. 
Visitors to Allahabad go to see the great fort erected upon the bank of 
the River Jumna by the Mahomedan emperor, Akbar. One of the sights 
of the fort, strange to tell, is the underground Hindu temple of "The 
Undying Banyan Tree," to which we descend by a long flight of steps. 
Such a sacred banyan tree as we have imagined, Akbar found growing 
there upon the slope of the river bank when he was requiring the 
ground for his fort. The undying banyan tree is now a stump or log, but
it or a predecessor was visited by a Chinese pilgrim to Allahabad in the 
seventh century A.D. Being very tolerant, instead of cutting down the 
tree, Akbar built a roof over it and filled up the ground all round to the 
level he required. And still through the gateway of the fort and down 
underground, the train of pilgrims passes as of old to where the banyan 
tree is still declared to grow. Such is Indian conservatism, undeterred 
by any thought of incongruity. Benares is crowded with examples of 
the same unconscious tenacity. I have spoken of the ruthless levelling 
of Hindu temples in Benares in former days to make way for 
Mahomedan mosques. Near the gate of Aurangzeb's mosque a strange 
scene meets the eye. Where the road leads to the mosque, and with no 
Hindu temple nowadays in sight, are seated a number of Hindu 
ashes-clad ascetics. What are they doing at the entrance to a 
Mahomedan mosque? That is where their predecessors used to sit two 
hundred years ago, before Aurangzeb tore down the holy Hindu temple 
of Siva and erected the mosque in its stead. 
[Sidenote: Yields before a persistent obtruding influence.] 
[Sidenote: E.g. British influence.] 
But Indian conservatism is more than an indisposition to effort and 
change; for the same reason, it is also an easy adaptation to things as 
they are found. When a new disturbing influence obtrudes from without, 
and persistently, it may be easier to give way than to resist. British 
influence is such a persistent obtrusion. In English literature as taught 
and read, in Christian standards of conduct, in the English language, 
and in the modern ideas of government and society, ever presented to 
the school-going section of the people of India within their own land, 
there is such a continuous influence from without. The impression of 
works like Tennyson's In Memoriam or _Idylls of the King_, common 
text-books in colleges, the steady pressure of Acts of the British 
Government in India, like that raising the marriage age of girls; the 
example of men in authority like Lord Curzon, during whose vice-regal 
tour in South India there were no nautch entertainments; the necessity 
of understanding expressions like "general election" and "public spirit," 
and of comprehending in some measure the working of local
self-government--all such constant pressure must effect a change in the 
mental standpoint. The army of Britain in India, representative of the 
imperial sceptre, has now for many years been gathered into 
cantonments, and its work is no longer to quell hostilities within India, 
but only to repel invaders from without. Other British forces, however, 
penetrating far deeper, working silently and for the most part 
unobserved, are still in the field all over India, effecting a grander 
change than the change of outward sovereignty. "Ideas rule the world," 
and he who impresses his ideas is the real ruler of men. 
[Sidenote: Indian conservatism overpowered otherwise.] 
Telling against Indian conservatism or inertia are other things also 
besides persistent Western influences. Many things Western appeal to 
the natural desire for advancement and comfort, and the adoption of 
these has often as corollary a change of idea. To take examples without 
further explanation. The desire for education, the key to advancement 
in life, has quietly ignored the old orthodox idea that education in 
Sanscrit and the Sacred Scriptures, i.e. higher education as formerly 
understood, is the exclusive privilege of certain castes. The very 
expression "higher education" has come to mean a modern English 
education, not as formerly an education in Sanscrit lore. Had the British 
Government allowed things to take their course, the still surviving 
institutions of the old kind for Oriental learning would have been 
transformed, one and all, into modern schools and    
    
		
	
	
	Continue reading on your phone by scaning this QR Code
	 	
	
	
	    Tip: The current page has been bookmarked automatically. If you wish to continue reading later, just open the 
Dertz Homepage, and click on the 'continue reading' link at the bottom of the page.