throwing a new light on the whole 
subject. Kessler's idea was, that besides the law of Mutual Struggle 
there is in Nature the law of Mutual Aid, which, for the success of the 
struggle for life, and especially for the progressive evolution of the 
species, is far more important than the law of mutual contest. This 
suggestion-- which was, in reality, nothing but a further development of 
the ideas expressed by Darwin himself in The Descent of Man--seemed 
to me so correct and of so great an importance, that since I became 
acquainted with it (in 1883) I began to collect materials for further 
developing the idea, which Kessler had only cursorily sketched in his 
lecture, but had not lived to develop. He died in 1881. 
In one point only I could not entirely endorse Kessler's views. Kessler 
alluded to "parental feeling" and care for progeny (see below, Chapter I) 
as to the source of mutual inclinations in animals. However, to 
determine how far these two feelings have really been at work in the 
evolution of sociable instincts, and how far other instincts have been at 
work in the same direction, seems to me a quite distinct and a very 
wide question, which we hardly can discuss yet. It will be only after we 
have well established the facts of mutual aid in different classes of
animals, and their importance for evolution, that we shall be able to 
study what belongs in the evolution of sociable feelings, to parental 
feelings, and what to sociability proper--the latter having evidently its 
origin at the earliest stages of the evolution of the animal world, 
perhaps even at the "colony-stages." I consequently directed my chief 
attention to establishing first of all, the importance of the Mutual Aid 
factor of evolution, leaving to ulterior research the task of discovering 
the origin of the Mutual Aid instinct in Nature. 
The importance of the Mutual Aid factor--"if its generality could only 
be demonstrated"--did not escape the naturalist's genius so manifest in 
Goethe. When Eckermann told once to Goethe-- it was in 1827--that 
two little wren-fledglings, which had run away from him, were found 
by him next day in the nest of robin redbreasts (Rothkehlchen), which 
fed the little ones, together with their own youngsters, Goethe grew 
quite excited about this fact. He saw in it a confirmation of his 
pantheistic views, and said:--"If it be true that this feeding of a stranger 
goes through all Nature as something having the character of a general 
law--then many an enigma would be solved. "He returned to this matter 
on the next day, and most earnestly entreated Eckermann (who was, as 
is known, a zoologist) to make a special study of the subject, adding 
that he would surely come "to quite invaluable treasuries of results" 
(Gesprache, edition of 1848, vol. iii. pp. 219, 221). Unfortunately, this 
study was never made, although it is very possible that Brehm, who has 
accumulated in his works such rich materials relative to mutual aid 
among animals, might have been inspired by Goethe's remark. 
Several works of importance were published in the years 1872-1886, 
dealing with the intelligence and the mental life of animals (they are 
mentioned in a footnote in Chapter I of this book), and three of them 
dealt more especially with the subject under consideration; namely, Les 
Societes animales, by Espinas (Paris, 1877); La Lutte pour l'existence 
et l'association pout la lutte, a lecture by J.L. Lanessan (April 1881); 
and Louis Buchner's book, Liebe und Liebes-Leben in der Thierwelt, of 
which the first edition appeared in 1882 or 1883, and a second, much 
enlarged, in 1885. But excellent though each of these works is, they 
leave ample room for a work in which Mutual Aid would be considered,
not only as an argument in favour of a pre-human origin of moral 
instincts, but also as a law of Nature and a factor of evolution. Espinas 
devoted his main attention to such animal societies (ants, bees) as are 
established upon a physiological division of labour, and though his 
work is full of admirable hints in all possible directions, it was written 
at a time when the evolution of human societies could not yet be treated 
with the knowledge we now possess. Lanessan's lecture has more the 
character of a brilliantly laid-out general plan of a work, in which 
mutual support would be dealt with, beginning with rocks in the sea, 
and then passing in review the world of plants, of animals and men. As 
to Buchner's work, suggestive though it is and rich in facts, I could not 
agree with its leading idea. The book begins with a hymn to Love, and 
nearly all its illustrations are intended to prove the existence of love 
and sympathy among animals. However, to reduce animal sociability to 
love    
    
		
	
	
	Continue reading on your phone by scaning this QR Code
	 	
	
	
	    Tip: The current page has been bookmarked automatically. If you wish to continue reading later, just open the 
Dertz Homepage, and click on the 'continue reading' link at the bottom of the page.