parts. 
Socrates: Very good, and have your teachers ever called these numbers 
ratios? 
Boy: Sometimes, Socrates, but usually only with simple numbers 
which make one-half, one-third, two-thirds and the like. 
Socrates: Yes, that is usually what people mean by ratios. The learned 
people call numbers made from the ratios, rational. Does the name 
rational number suit you to call a number which can be expressed as the 
ratio of two whole numbers, whether they be odd or even whole 
numbers? 
Boy: You want me to call the numbers made from ratios of whole 
numbers something called rational? A ratio makes a rational number? 
Socrates: Yes boy, can you do that? 
Boy: Certainly, Socrates. 
Socrates: Do you agree with the way I told him this, Meno? Does it 
violate our agreement? 
Meno: You added -nal to the word ratio, just as we add -nal to the 
French word "jour" to create the word journal which means something 
that contains words of the "jour" or of today. So we now have a word 
which means a number made from a ratio. This is more than acceptable 
to me, Socrates. A sort of lesson in linguistics, perhaps, but certainly 
not in mathematics. No, I do not see that you have told him how to 
solve anything about the square root of two, but thank you for asking. I 
give you your journalistic license to do so. 
Socrates: Good. Now boy, I need your attention. Please get up and 
stretch, if it will help you stay and think for awhile. 
Boy: (stretches only a little) I am fine, Socrates. 
Socrates: Now think carefully, boy, what kind of ratios can we make 
from even numbers and odd numbers? 
Boy: We could make even numbers divided by odd numbers, and odd 
numbers divided by even numbers. 
Socrates: Yes, we could. Could we make any other kind? 
Boy: Well . . . we could make even numbers divided by even numbers, 
or odd numbers divided by odd. 
Socrates: Very good. Any other kind? 
Boy: I'm not sure, I can't think of any, but I might have to think a while
to be sure. 
Socrates: (to Meno) Are you still satisfied. 
Meno: Yes, Socrates. He knows even and odd numbers, and ratios; as 
do all the school children his age. 
Socrates: Very well, boy. You have named four kinds of ratios: Even 
over odd, odd over even, even over even, odd over odd, and all the 
ratios make numbers we call rational numbers. 
Boy: That's what it looks like, Socrates. 
Socrates: Meno, have you anything to contribute here? 
Meno: No, Socrates, I am fine. 
Socrates: Very well. Now, boy, we are off in search of more about the 
square root of two. We have divided the rational numbers into four 
groups, odd/even, even/odd, even/even, odd/odd? 
Boy: Yes. 
Socrates: And if we find another group we can include them. Now, we 
want to find which one of these groups, if any, contains the number you 
found the other day, the one which squared is two. 
Would that be fun to try? 
Boy: Yes, Socrates, and also educational. 
Socrates: I think we can narrow these four groups down to three, and 
thus make the search easier. Would you like that? 
Boy: Certainly, Socrates. 
Socrates: Let's take even over even ratios. What are they? 
Boy: We know that both parts of the ratio have two in them. 
Socrates: Excellent. See, Meno, how well he has learned his lessons in 
school. His teacher must be proud, for I have taught him nothing of this, 
have I? 
Meno: No, I have not seen you teach it to him, therefore he must have 
been exposed to it elsewhere. 
Socrates: (back to the boy) And what have you learned about ratios of 
even numbers, boy? 
Boy: That both parts can be divided by two, to get the twos out, over 
and over, until one part becomes odd. 
Socrates: Very good. Do all school children know that, Meno? 
Meno: All the ones who stay awake in class. (he stretches) 
Socrates: So, boy, we can change the parts of the ratios, without 
changing the real meaning of the ratio itself?
Boy: Yes, Socrates. I will demonstrate, as we do in class. Suppose I use 
16 and 8, as we did the other day. If I make a ratio of 16 divided by 8, I 
can divide both the 16 and the 8 by two and get 8 divided by 4. We can 
see that 8 divided by 4 is the same as 16 divided by 8, each one is twice 
the other, as it should be. We can then divide by two again and get 4 
over 2, and again to get 2 over 1. We can't do it again, so we say that 
this fraction has been reduced    
    
		
	
	
	Continue reading on your phone by scaning this QR Code
	 	
	
	
	    Tip: The current page has been bookmarked automatically. If you wish to continue reading later, just open the 
Dertz Homepage, and click on the 'continue reading' link at the bottom of the page.