those who knew him, for the 
simplicity of his manners, and the ardour of his benevolence. The 
regard conceived by these two persons for each other, was mutual, and 
partook of a spirit of the purest attachment. Mary had been bred in the 
principles of the church of England, but her esteem for this venerable 
preacher led her occasionally to attend upon his public instructions. Her 
religion was, in reality, little allied to any system of forms; and, as she 
has often told me, was founded rather in taste, than in the niceties of 
polemical discussion. Her mind constitutionally attached itself to the 
sublime and the amiable. She found an inexpressible delight in the 
beauties of nature, and in the splendid reveries of the imagination. But 
nature itself, she thought, would be no better than a vast blank, if the 
mind of the observer did not supply it with an animating soul. When 
she walked amidst the wonders of nature, she was accustomed to 
converse with her God. To her mind he was pictured as not less 
amiable, generous and kind, than great, wise and exalted. In fact, she
had received few lessons of religion in her youth, and her religion was 
almost entirely of her own creation. But she was not on that account the 
less attached to it, or the less scrupulous in discharging what she 
considered as its duties. She could not recollect the time when she had 
believed the doctrine of future punishments. The tenets of her system 
were the growth of her own moral taste, and her religion therefore had 
always been a gratification, never a terror, to her. She expected a future 
state; but she would not allow her ideas of that future state to be 
modified by the notions of judgment and retribution. From this sketch, 
it is sufficiently evident, that the pleasure she took in an occasional 
attendance upon the sermons of Dr. Price, was not accompanied with a 
superstitious adherence to his doctrines. The fact is, that, as far down as 
the year 1787, she regularly frequented public worship, for the most 
part according to the forms of the church of England. After that period 
her attendance became less constant, and in no long time was wholly 
discontinued. I believe it may be admitted as a maxim, that no person 
of a well furnished mind, that has shaken off the implicit subsection of 
youth, and is not the zealous partizan of a sect, can bring himself to 
conform to the public and regular routine of sermons and prayers. 
Another of the friends she acquired at this period, was Mrs. Burgh, 
widow of the author of the Political Disquisitions, a woman universally 
well spoken of for the warmth and purity of her benevolence. Mary, 
whenever she had occasion to allude to her, to the last period of her life, 
paid the tribute due to her virtues. The only remaining friend necessary 
to be enumerated in this place, is the rev. John Hewlet, now master of a 
boarding-school at Shacklewel near Hackney, whom I shall have 
occasion to mention hereafter. 
I have already said that Fanny's health had been materially injured by 
her incessant labours for the maintenance of her family. She had also 
suffered a disappointment, which preyed upon her mind. To these 
different sources of ill health she became gradually a victim; and at 
length discovered all the symptoms of a pulmonary consumption. By 
the medical men that attended her, she was advised to try the effects of 
a southern climate; and, about the beginning of the year 1785, sailed for 
Lisbon. 
The first feeling with which Mary had contemplated her friend, was a 
sentiment of inferiority and reverence; but that, from the operation of a
ten years' acquaintance, was considerably changed. Fanny had 
originally been far before her in literary attainments; this disparity no 
longer existed. In whatever degree Mary might endeavour to free 
herself from the delusions of self-esteem, this period of observation 
upon her own mind and that of her friend, could not pass, without her 
perceiving that there were some essential characteristics of genius, 
which she possessed, and in which her friend was deficient. The 
principal of these was a firmness of mind, an unconquerable greatness 
of soul, by which, after a short internal struggle, she was accustomed to 
rise above difficulties and suffering. Whatever Mary undertook, she 
perhaps in all instances accomplished; and, to her lofty spirit, scarcely 
anything she desired, appeared hard to perform. Fanny, on the contrary, 
was a woman of a timid and irresolute nature, accustomed to yield to 
difficulties, and probably priding herself in this morbid softness of her 
temper. One instance that I have heard Mary relate of this sort, was, 
that, at a certain time, Fanny, dissatisfied with her domestic situation, 
expressed    
    
		
	
	
	Continue reading on your phone by scaning this QR Code
	 	
	
	
	    Tip: The current page has been bookmarked automatically. If you wish to continue reading later, just open the 
Dertz Homepage, and click on the 'continue reading' link at the bottom of the page.