of others than either by 
fretting and obstructing, or by worrying over, their own children who 
are no longer children. It is quite true that the children may go astray 
even when they have ceased to be children. But the time to implant the 
seeds of virtue, the time to convey a knowledge of life, was when they 
were small. If it was done well, it only remains to exercise faith and 
trust. If it was done ill, nothing done later will compensate, for it is 
merely foolish for a mother who could not educate her children when 
they were small to imagine that she is able to educate them when they 
are big. 
So it is that the problem of the attitude of the child to its parents circles
round again to that of the parents to the child. The wise parent realises 
that childhood is simply a preparation for the free activities of later life, 
that the parents exist in order to equip children for life and not to 
shelter and protect them from the world into which they must be cast. 
Education, whatever else it should or should not be, must be an 
inoculation against the poisons of life and an adequate equipment in 
knowledge and skill for meeting the chances of life. Beyond that, and 
no doubt in the largest part, it is a natural growth and takes place of 
itself. 
 
 
 
CHAPTER II 
THE MEANING OF PURITY 
I 
We live in a world in which, as we nowadays begin to realise, we find 
two antagonistic streams of traditional platitude concerning the 
question of sexual purity, both flowing from the far past. 
The people who embody one of these streams of tradition, basing 
themselves on old-fashioned physiology, assume, though they may not 
always assert, that the sexual products are excretions, to be dealt with 
summarily like other excretions. That is an ancient view and it was 
accepted by such wise philosophers of old times as Montaigne and Sir 
Thomas More. It had, moreover, the hearty support of so eminent a 
theological authority as Luther, who on this ground preached early 
marriage to men and women alike. It is still a popular view, sometimes 
expressed in the crudest terms, and often by people who, not following 
Luther's example, use it to defend prostitution, though they generally 
exclude women from its operation, as a sex to whom it fails to apply 
and by whom it is not required.
But on the other hand we have another stream of platitude. On this side 
there is usually little attempt either to deny or to affirm the theory of 
the opposing party, though they would contradict its conclusions. Their 
theory, if they have one, would usually seem to be that sexual activity 
is a response to stimulation from without or from within, so that if there 
is no stimulation there will be no sexual manifestation. They would 
preach, they tell us, a strenuous ideal; they would set up a wholesome 
dictate of hygiene. The formula put forward on this basis usually runs: 
Continence is not only harmless but beneficial. It is a formula which, in 
one form or another, has received apparently enthusiastic approval in 
many quarters, even from distinguished physicians. We need not be 
surprised. A proposition so large and general is not easy to deny, and is 
still more difficult to reverse; therefore it proves welcome to the 
people--especially the people occupying public and professional 
positions--who wish to find the path of least resistance, under pressure 
of a vigorous section of public opinion. Yet in its vagueness the 
proposition is a little disingenuous; it condescends to no definitions and 
no qualifications; it fails even to make clear how it is to be reconciled 
with any enthusiastic approval of marriage, for if continence is 
beautiful how can marriage make it cease to be so? 
Both these streams of feeling, it may be noted, sprang from a common 
source far back in the primitive human world. All the emanations of the 
human body, all the spontaneous manifestations of its activities, were 
mysterious and ominous to early man, pregnant with terror unless met 
with immense precautions and surrounded by careful ritual. The 
manifestations of sex were the least intelligible and the most 
spontaneous. Therefore the things of sex were those that most lent 
themselves to feelings of horror and awe, of impurity and of purity. 
They seemed so highly charged with magic potency that there were no 
things that men more sought to avoid, yet none to which they were 
impelled to give more thought. The manifold echoes of that primitive 
conception of sex, and all the violent reactions that were thus evolved 
and eventually bound up with the original impulse, compose the 
streams of tradition that feed our modern world in    
    
		
	
	
	Continue reading on your phone by scaning this QR Code
	 	
	
	
	    Tip: The current page has been bookmarked automatically. If you wish to continue reading later, just open the 
Dertz Homepage, and click on the 'continue reading' link at the bottom of the page.