into that painful subject; and the following extracts from his 
defence,--if defence it can be called, where there has never yet been 
any definite charge,--will be perused with strong interest:-- 
"My learned brother proceeds to observe, that 'it is in vain for Lord B. 
to attempt in any way to justify his own behaviour in that affair: and 
now that he has so openly and audaciously invited enquiry and 
reproach, we do not see any good reason why he should not be plainly 
told so by the voice of his countrymen.' How far the 'openness' of an 
anonymous poem, and the 'audacity' of an imaginary character, which 
the writer supposes to be meant for Lady B. may be deemed to merit
this formidable denunciation from their 'most sweet voices,' I neither 
know nor care; but when he tells me that I cannot 'in any way justify 
my own behaviour in that affair,' I acquiesce, because no man can 
'_justify_' himself until he knows of what he is accused; and I have 
never had--and, God knows, my whole desire has ever been to obtain 
it--any specific charge, in a tangible shape, submitted to me by the 
adversary, nor by others, unless the atrocities of public rumour and the 
mysterious silence of the lady's legal advisers may be deemed such.[2] 
But is not the writer content with what has been already said and done? 
Has not 'the general voice of his countrymen' long ago pronounced 
upon the subject--sentence without trial, and condemnation without a 
charge? Have I not been exiled by ostracism, except that the shells 
which proscribed me were anonymous? Is the writer ignorant of the 
public opinion and the public conduct upon that occasion? If he is, I am 
not: the public will forget both long before I shall cease to remember 
either. 
"The man who is exiled by a faction has the consolation of thinking 
that he is a martyr; he is upheld by hope and the dignity of his cause, 
real or imaginary: he who withdraws from the pressure of debt may 
indulge in the thought that time and prudence will retrieve his 
circumstances: he who is condemned by the law has a term to his 
banishment, or a dream of its abbreviation; or, it may be, the 
knowledge or the belief of some injustice of the law or of its 
administration in his own particular: but he who is outlawed by general 
opinion, without the intervention of hostile politics, illegal judgment, or 
embarrassed circumstances, whether he be innocent or guilty, must 
undergo all the bitterness of exile, without hope, without pride, without 
alleviation. This case was mine. Upon what grounds the public founded 
their opinion, I am not aware; but it was general, and it was decisive. 
Of me or of mine they knew little, except that I had written what is 
called poetry, was a nobleman, had married, became a father, and was 
involved in differences with my wife and her relatives, no one knew 
why, because the persons complaining refused to state their grievances. 
The fashionable world was divided into parties, mine consisting of a 
very small minority; the reasonable world was naturally on the stronger 
side, which happened to be the lady's, as was most proper and polite.
The press was active and scurrilous; and such was the rage of the day, 
that the unfortunate publication of two copies of verses rather 
complimentary than otherwise to the subjects, of both, was tortured into 
a species of crime, or constructive petty treason. I was accused of every 
monstrous vice by public rumour and private rancour: my name, which 
had been a knightly or a noble one since my fathers helped to conquer 
the kingdom for William the Norman, was tainted. I felt that, if what 
was whispered, and muttered, and murmured, was true, I was unfit for 
England; if false, England was unfit for me. I withdrew: but this was 
not enough. In other countries, in Switzerland, in the shadow of the 
Alps, and by the blue depth of the lakes, I was pursued and breathed 
upon by the same blight. I crossed the mountains, but it was the same; 
so I went a little farther, and settled myself by the waves of the Adriatic, 
like the stag at bay, who betakes him to the waters. 
"If I may judge by the statements of the few friends who gathered 
round me, the outcry of the period to which I allude was beyond all 
precedent, all parallel, even in those cases where political motives have 
sharpened slander and doubled enmity. I was advised not to go to the 
theatres, lest I should be hissed, nor to my duty in parliament, lest I 
should be insulted by the way; even on the day of my departure, my 
most intimate    
    
		
	
	
	Continue reading on your phone by scaning this QR Code
 
	 	
	
	
	    Tip: The current page has been bookmarked automatically. If you wish to continue reading later, just open the 
Dertz Homepage, and click on the 'continue reading' link at the bottom of the page.
	    
	    
