In Spain great schools grew up at 
Palencia, Salamanca, and Valladolid; in France at Montpellier, Orleans, 
Angers, and Toulouse, and at Lyons and Reims. The impulse given by 
Bologna and Paris was thus leading to the foundation of new Studia or 
the development of old ones, for there were schools of repute at many 
of the places we have mentioned before the period with which we are 
now dealing (c. 1170-1250). It was inevitable that there should be a 
rivalry among these numerous schools, a rivalry which was accentuated 
as small and insignificant Studia came to claim for themselves equality 
of status with their older and greater contemporaries. Thus, in the latter 
half of the thirteenth century, there arose a necessity for a definition 
and a restriction of the term Studium Generale. The desirability of a 
definition was enhanced by the practice of granting to ecclesiastics 
dispensations from residence in their benefices for purposes of study; to 
prevent abuses it was essential that such permission should be limited 
to a number of (p. 008) recognised Studia Generalia. 
The difficulty of enforcing such a definition throughout almost the 
whole of Europe might seem likely to be great, but in point of fact it 
was inconsiderable. In the first half of the thirteenth century, the term 
Studium Generale was assuming recognised significance; a school 
which aspired to the name must not be restricted to natives of a 
particular town or country, it must have a number of masters, and it 
must teach not only the Seven Liberal Arts (of which we shall have to 
speak later), but also one or more of the higher studies of Theology, 
Law and Medicine (cf. Rashdall, vol. i. p. 9). But the title might still be 
adopted at will by ambitious schools, and the intervention of the great 
potentates of Europe was required to provide a mechanism for the 
differentiation of General from Particular Studia. Already, in the 
twelfth century, an Emperor and a Pope had given special privileges to 
students at Bologna and other Lombard towns, and a King of France 
had conferred privileges upon the scholars of Paris. In 1224 the 
Studium Generale of Naples was founded by the Emperor Frederick II., 
and in 1231 he gave a great privilege to the School of Medicine at 
Salerno, a Studium which was much more ancient than Bologna, but 
which existed solely for the study of Medicine and exerted no influence
upon the (p. 009) growth of the European universities. Pope Gregory 
IX. founded the Studium at Toulouse some fifteen years before 
Innocent IV. established the Studium of the Roman Court. In 1254 
Alfonso the Wise of Castile founded the Studium Generale of 
Salamanca. Thus it became usual for a school which claimed the status 
of a Studium Generale to possess the authority of Pope or Emperor or 
King. 
A distinction gradually arose between a Studium Generale under the 
authority of a Pope or an Emperor and one which was founded by a 
King or a City Republic, and which was known as a Studium Generale 
respectu regni. The distinction was founded upon the power of the 
Emperor or the Pope to grant the jus ubique docendi. This privilege, 
which could be conferred by no lesser potentate, gave a master in one 
Studium Generale the right of teaching in any other; it was more 
valuable in theory than in practice, but it was held in such esteem that 
in 1292 Bologna and Paris accepted the privilege from Pope Nicholas 
IV. Some of the Studia which we have mentioned as existing in the first 
half of the thirteenth century--Modena in Italy, and Lyons and Reims in 
France--never obtained this privilege, and as their organisation and 
their importance did not justify their inclusion among Studia Generalia, 
they never took rank among the universities of Europe. The status of 
Bologna and of Paris was, of course, (p. 010) universally recognised 
before and apart from the Bulls of Nicholas IV.; Padua did not accept a 
Papal grant until 1346 and then merely as a confirmation, not a creation, 
of its privileges as a Studium Generale; Oxford never received, though 
it twice asked for, a declaratory or confirmatory Bull, and based its 
claim upon immemorial custom and its own great position. Cambridge, 
which in the thirteenth century was a much less important seat of 
learning than Oxford, was formally recognised as a Studium Generale 
by Pope John XXII. in 1318; but its claim to the title had long been 
admitted, at all events within the realm of England. After 1318 
Cambridge could grant the licentia ubique docendi, which Oxford did 
not formally confer, although Oxford men, as the graduates of a 
Studium Generale, certainly possessed the privilege. 
Long before the definition of a Studium Generale as a school
possessing, by the gift of    
    
		
	
	
	Continue reading on your phone by scaning this QR Code
 
	 	
	
	
	    Tip: The current page has been bookmarked automatically. If you wish to continue reading later, just open the 
Dertz Homepage, and click on the 'continue reading' link at the bottom of the page.
	    
	    
