his ancestors, of the third and fourth 
generations, held, as we understand, a modest but independent social 
position. 
* I am indebted for these facts, as well as for some others referring to, 
or supplied by, Mr. Browning's uncles, to some notes made for the 
Browning Society by Dr. Furnivall. 
This fragment of history, if we may so call it, accords better with our 
impression of Mr. Browning's genius than could any pedigree which 
more palpably connected him with the 'knightly' and 'squirely' families 
whose name he bore. It supplies the strong roots of English national life 
to which we instinctively refer it. Both the vivid originality of that 
genius and its healthy assimilative power stamp it as, in some sense, the 
product of virgin soil; and although the varied elements which entered 
into its growth were racial as well as cultural, and inherited as well as 
absorbed, the evidence of its strong natural or physical basis remains 
undisturbed.
Mr. Browning, for his own part, maintained a neutral attitude in the 
matter. He neither claimed nor disclaimed the more remote 
genealogical past which had presented itself as a certainty to some 
older members of his family. He preserved the old framed coat-of-arms 
handed down to him from his grandfather; and used, without misgiving 
as to his right to do so, a signet-ring engraved from it, the gift of a 
favourite uncle, in years gone by. But, so long as he was young, he had 
no reason to think about his ancestors; and, when he was old, he had no 
reason to care about them; he knew himself to be, in every possible 
case, the most important fact in his family history. 
Roi ne suis, ni Prince aussi, Suis le seigneur de Conti, 
he wrote, a few years back, to a friend who had incidentally questioned 
him about it. 
Our immediate knowledge of the family begins with Mr. Browning's 
grandfather, also a Robert Browning, who obtained through Lord 
Shaftesbury's influence a clerkship in the Bank of England, and entered 
on it when barely twenty, in 1769. He served fifty years, and rose to the 
position of Principal of the Bank Stock Office, then an important one, 
and which brought him into contact with the leading financiers of the 
day. He became also a lieutenant in the Honourable Artillery Company, 
and took part in the defence of the Bank in the Gordon Riots of 1789. 
He was an able, energetic, and worldly man: an Englishman, very much 
of the provincial type; his literary tastes being limited to the Bible and 
'Tom Jones', both of which he is said to have read through once a year. 
He possessed a handsome person and, probably, a vigorous constitution, 
since he lived to the age of eighty-four, though frequently tormented by 
gout; a circumstance which may help to account for his not having seen 
much of his grandchildren, the poet and his sister; we are indeed told 
that he particularly dreaded the lively boy's vicinity to his afflicted foot. 
He married, in 1778, Margaret, daughter of a Mr. Tittle by his marriage 
with Miss Seymour; and who was born in the West Indies and had 
inherited property there. They had three children: Robert, the poet's 
father; a daughter, who lived an uneventful life and plays no part in the 
family history; and another son who died an infant. The Creole mother
died also when her eldest boy was only seven years old, and passed out 
of his memory in all but an indistinct impression of having seen her 
lying in her coffin. Five years later the widower married a Miss Smith, 
who gave him a large family. 
This second marriage of Mr. Browning's was a critical event in the life 
of his eldest son; it gave him, to all appearance, two step-parents 
instead of one. There could have been little sympathy between his 
father and himself, for no two persons were ever more unlike, but there 
was yet another cause for the systematic unkindness under which the 
lad grew up. Mr. Browning fell, as a hard man easily does, greatly 
under the influence of his second wife, and this influence was made by 
her to subserve the interests of a more than natural jealousy of her 
predecessor. An early instance of this was her banishing the dead lady's 
portrait to a garret, on the plea that her husband did not need two wives. 
The son could be no burden upon her because he had a little income, 
derived from his mother's brother; but this, probably, only heightened 
her ill-will towards him. When he was old enough to go to a University, 
and very desirous of going--when, moreover, he offered to do so at his 
own cost--she induced his father to forbid it, because, she urged, they 
could not    
    
		
	
	
	Continue reading on your phone by scaning this QR Code
 
	 	
	
	
	    Tip: The current page has been bookmarked automatically. If you wish to continue reading later, just open the 
Dertz Homepage, and click on the 'continue reading' link at the bottom of the page.
	    
	    
