the successors of the great 
King who were independent from the times of the Arsacide dynasty.[1] 
Subsequently as Aliides and Ziyarids, they were closely attached to 
Shiaism with its definite expression of Persian sympathy. Nevertheless, 
this province was not favourable for a particularly successful national 
evolution. The fact was that even in the Sasanian epoch Tabaristan 
remained a distant and obscure frontier division and did not take part in 
the progress of civilisation of the times. Therefore it could not form the 
centre of gravity of Persian life although there is no doubt that in 
several respects in this province there were preserved typical features 
of Sasanian antiquity. 
[Footnote 1: For a general conspectus of the history of the provinces 
with regard to their independence during the Sasanian and Arab 
domination, see, e.g. F. Justi, G.I. Ph., II, pp. 547-49--"History of Iran 
from the earliest to the end of the Sasanides" in German--Appendix I.] 
KHORASAN. 
It was otherwise with the Eastern provinces of Khorasan, too far distant 
from the territary occupied by the Arab settlers, and too densely 
inhabited by Iranians to rapidly lose its previous characteristics. On the 
contrary, we know from the historians that in this province Iranian 
elements remained steadfast throughout the Umayyad dynasty and it 
was exclusively due to the support given by Khorasanians to the 
Abbasides that the latter succeeded in overthrowing the previous 
dynasty and commenced the era of powerful Iranian influences in the 
history of the Musalman Orient.[1] Khorasan played a vital part in the 
development of the modern Persian literature and especially its chief 
department, poetry. The entire early period of the history of modern 
Persian poetry, from Abbas welcoming with an ode Khalif Mamun into
Merv down to Firdausi, may be labelled Khorasanian. There flourished 
the activity of Rudaki, Kisai, Dakiki, and other less notable 
representatives of the early period of modern Persian bards.[2] The 
culture of poetry was favoured not only by the geographical position of 
the province of Khorasan but by its political conditions. Already in the 
beginning of the ninth century in Khorasan there had arisen national 
Persian dynasties and under their patronage began the renascence of the 
Persian nation (Taherides, Saffarides, Samanides). 
[Footnote 1: On the history of Khorasan in the Umayyad period see J. 
Wellhausen Das Arabische Reich und Sein Sturz, p, 247 f. and p. 306 
f.] 
[Footnote 2: See the general survey of this period in J, Darmesteter, 
"The Origins of the Persian Poesy", in French and E.G. Browne 
"Literary History of Persia", I, p, 350 ff.] 
FARS. 
Under different circumstances but with considerable significance for 
the Persian national ideals lay the Southern province of Fars. Here with 
tenacious insistence survived not only national but also political 
traditions of ancient Sasanian Persia. Here was the centre of a 
government and from here started fresh dynasties. After the Arab 
conquest this province came into much more intimate connection with 
the Khalifate, than, for instance, Khorasan. But Persian elements were 
favoured by its geographical position,--the mountainous character of its 
situation and the consequent difficulty of access by the invaders. We 
already produced above the information of the Arab geographers of the 
tenth century regarding the abundance of fire-temples and castles in 
Fars. They relate that there was no village or hamlet of this province in 
which there was no fire-temple. Residence was taken up in strong 
castles by the native aristocrats whose ideals were rooted in the 
Sasanian epoch. Just in these geographers, Istakhri and Ibn Hauqal, is 
to be found information of unusual importance, so far as we can judge, 
regarding the conservation of the Parsi tradition in Fars These authors 
have been up to now not only not appreciated but their significance for 
our question has not yet been adequately recognised.
Istakhri and Ibn Hauqal enumerating the castles of Fars declare as 
follows regarding the castle of Shiz:[1] 
"The castle of Shiz is situated in the district of Arrajana. There live 
fire-worshippers[2] who know Persia and her past. Here they study. 
This castle is very strong." 
[Footnote 1: Istakhri, p. 118, 2-4; Ibn Hauqal, p, 180, 1-2.] 
[Footnote 2: In the text occurs the Persian word badgozar, that is to say, 
the rhapsodists, the relators of the national traditions; on this word see 
B.G.A. III, pp. 182-83, and Vuller's Lexicon Persico-Latinum S.V. For 
a parallel to the archives of the Achamenide empire see F. Justi, Ein 
Tag aus den Leben des konigs Darius.] 
Further we read the following in Istakhri (page 150, 14-17):-- 
"In the district of Sabur on the mountain there are likenesses of all the 
noteworthy Persian kings and grandees, of illustrious preservers of fire, 
high mobeds and others. Their portraits, their acts and narratives about 
them are successively recorded in volumes. With particular care are 
preserved these volumes by the people living in    
    
		
	
	
	Continue reading on your phone by scaning this QR Code
	 	
	
	
	    Tip: The current page has been bookmarked automatically. If you wish to continue reading later, just open the 
Dertz Homepage, and click on the 'continue reading' link at the bottom of the page.