degradation, when the capital deserted 
by the Popes was fast going to ruin, and when foreigners and native 
tyrants were struggling for the possession of their fairest territories, the 
memory of the imperial authority of their country, and the crumbling
monuments that bore witness to it still standing in their midst, served to 
turn their patriotic ardour towards the great literary treasures 
bequeathed to them by Pagan Rome. Greek literature, too, was not 
forgotten, though in the thirteenth century few western scholars 
possessed any acquaintance with the language. Many causes, however, 
combined to prepare the way for a revival of Greek. The commercial 
cities of Italy were in close touch with the Eastern Empire, especially 
since the Crusades; ambassadors, sent by the Emperors to seek the 
assistance of the Pope and of the Western rulers in the struggle against 
the Turks, were passing from court to court; the negotiations for a 
reunion of the Churches, which had been going on since the days of the 
first Council of Lyons, rendered a knowledge of Greek and of the 
writings of the Greek Fathers necessary for some of the leading 
ecclesiastics of the West; while, finally, the fall of Constantinople in 
1453 forced many Greek scholars to seek a refuge in Italy or France, 
and provided the agents sent by the Popes and Italian rulers with a 
splendid opportunity of securing priceless treasures for the Western 
libraries. 
Though Dante (1265-1321) is sometimes regarded as the earliest of the 
Humanist school[2] on account of his professed admiration for some of 
the Pagan masters and of the blending in his /Divina Comedia/ of the 
beauties of Roman literature with the teaching of the Fathers and 
Scholastics, still, the spirit that inspired him was the spirit of 
Christianity, and his outlook on life was frankly the outlook of the 
Middle Ages. To Petrarch (1304-74) rather belongs the honour of 
having been the most prominent, if not the very first writer, whose 
works were influenced largely by Humanist ideals. Born in Arezzo in 
1304, he accompanied his father to Avignon when the latter was exiled 
from Florence. His friends wished him to study law; but, his poetic 
tendencies proving too strong for him, he abandoned his professional 
pursuits to devote his energies to literature. The patronage and help 
afforded him willingly by the Avignonese Popes[3] and other 
ecclesiastics provided him with the means of pursuing his favourite 
studies, and helped him considerably in his searches for manuscripts of 
the classics. Though only a cleric in minor orders, he was appointed 
Canon of Lombez (1335), papal ambassador to Naples (1343),
prothonotary apostolic (1346), and archdeacon of Parma (1348). These 
positions secured to him a competent income, and, at the same time, 
brought him into touch with libraries and influential men. 
The ruin of Italy and Rome, caused in great measure by the absence of 
the Popes during their residence at Avignon, roused all the patriotic 
instincts of Petrarch, and urged him to strive with all his might for the 
restoration of the ancient glory of his country. Hence in his politics he 
was strongly nationalist, and hence, too, he threw the whole weight of 
his influence on the side of Cola di Rienzi, when in 1347 the latter 
proclaimed from the Capitol the establishment of the Roman Republic. 
Nor did he hesitate to attack the Popes, to whom he was indebted so 
deeply, for their neglect of Rome and the Papal States, as well as for 
the evils which he thought had fallen upon Italy owing to the 
withdrawal of the Popes to Avignon. He himself strove to awaken in 
the minds of his countrymen memories of the past by forming 
collections of old Roman coins, by restoring or protecting wherever 
possible the Pagan monuments, and by searching after and copying 
manuscripts of the classical writers. In poetry, Virgil was his favourite 
guide. As a rule he wrote in Italian, but his writings were saturated with 
the spirit of the early Pagan authors; while in his pursuit of glory and 
his love for natural, sensible beauty, he manifested tendencies opposed 
directly to the self-restraint, symbolism, and purity of the Middle Ages. 
His longest poem is /Africa/, devoted to a rehearsal of the glories of 
ancient Rome and breathing a spirit of patriotism and zeal for a long 
lost culture, but it is rather for his love songs, the /canzoni/, that he is 
best remembered. 
Petrarch, though a Humanist,[4] was no enemy of the Christian religion, 
nor did he imagine for a moment that the study of the Pagan classics 
could prove dangerous in the least degree to revealed religion. It is true 
that his private life did not always correspond to Christian principles of 
morality, and it is equally true that at times his patriotism led him to 
speak    
    
		
	
	
	Continue reading on your phone by scaning this QR Code
 
	 	
	
	
	    Tip: The current page has been bookmarked automatically. If you wish to continue reading later, just open the 
Dertz Homepage, and click on the 'continue reading' link at the bottom of the page.
	    
	    
