circumstances pray to God for special and personal blessings, and when 
they are granted, they feel grateful, and sometimes express their 
gratitude. A common method of expressing this gratitude is by giving
something to the church. Thus we find in our church records entries 
like the following:-- 
From ---- ----, As a thank-offering for the recovery £ S. D. of a dear 
child. ------- " ---- ----, Peace-offering for reconciliation with an old 
friend. ------- " ---- ----, Offering for the preservation of a friend going 
abroad. ------- " ---- ----, Thank-offering for a fortunate transaction in 
business. ------- 
Such offerings are remarked upon favourably by the leaders of the 
Church, and regarded as examples worthy of being imitated by all 
pious Christians. But should the prayers not be granted, there is no gift. 
The non-fulfilment of their desires is regarded perhaps not altogether as 
an evidence of God's displeasure, but at least as a token that what was 
asked it was not His pleasure to grant. They make little enquiry 
concerning the real cause of failure, but take credit to themselves for 
humbly submitting to God's will. This unenquiring submission is often, 
however, both sinful and superstitious. Every result has its cause, and it 
is surely our duty, as far as observation and reason can guide us, to 
discover the causes which operate against us. The great majority of the 
afflictions and misfortunes which befall us are punishments for the 
breakage of some law, the committal of some sin physical or moral, 
and this being the case, it behoves us to find out what law has been 
transgressed, what the nature of the sin committed. This principle is 
acknowledged by our religious teachers, but the laws which have been 
broken, have not been wisely sought after. The field of search has been 
almost exclusively the moral, or the theological field; whereas the 
correct rule is, for physical effects, look for physical causes; for moral 
effects, moral causes. This rule has not been followed. A few cases 
illustrative of what I mean will clearly demonstrate the superstitious 
nature of what is a widely diffused opinion among the religious 
societies of this country at the present time. 
Forty-six years ago, when cholera first broke out in this country, it was 
immediately proclaimed to be a judgment for a national sin; and so it 
was, but for a sin against physical laws. I well remember the 
indignation which arose and found expression in almost every pulpit in 
the country, when the Prime Minister of that day, in reply to a petition 
from the Church asking him to proclaim a national fast for the removal 
of the plague, told his petitioners to first remove every source of
nuisance by cleansing drains and ditches, and removing stagnant pools, 
and otherwise observe the general laws of health, then having done all 
that lay in our power, we could ask God to bless our efforts, and He 
would hear us. All sorts of absurd causes were seriously advanced to 
account for the presence of this alarming malady. One party discovered 
the cause in a movement for the disestablishment of religion. Another 
considered it was a judgment from God for asking the Reform Bill. The 
Radicals proclaimed it to be a trick of the Tories to prevent agitation 
for reform, and added that medical men were bribed to poison wells 
and streams. The non-religious displayed as great superstition in this 
matter as did the religious. Large bills, headed in large type "Cholera 
Humbug," were at that time posted on the blank walls of the streets of 
Glasgow. The feeling against medical men was then so intense, that 
some of them were mobbed, and narrowly escaped with their lives. In 
Paisley, considered to be the most intelligent town in Scotland, a doctor, 
who was working night and day for the relief of the sufferers, had his 
house and shop sacked, and was obliged to fly for shelter, or his life 
would have been sacrificed to the fury of the mob. 
When we read that epidemics which broke out in the times of our 
forefathers, were ascribed to such absurd causes as the introduction of 
forks, or because the nation neglected to prosecute with sufficient 
vigour alleged cases of compact with the devil, we wonder at and pity 
their ignorance, and rejoice that we live in a more enlightened age. But 
the fact is, that among the mass of the people there is really no great 
difference between the present and the past. There is a close family 
likeness in this matter of superstition between now and long ago, and 
this state of matters will continue so long as a knowledge of physical 
science--that science which treats of the laws by which God is pleased 
to overrule and direct material things--is    
    
		
	
	
	Continue reading on your phone by scaning this QR Code
	 	
	
	
	    Tip: The current page has been bookmarked automatically. If you wish to continue reading later, just open the 
Dertz Homepage, and click on the 'continue reading' link at the bottom of the page.